Something went wrong. Try again later

byterunner

This user has not updated recently.

348 0 22 5
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

byterunner's forum posts

Avatar image for byterunner
byterunner

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By byterunner
@TromboneTony said:

So depressing how quickly developers will throw out a franchise these days.

You mean publishers. And from there perspective, what they did was smart. Even though Guerrilla was well received, obviously THQ found that it itself didn't get enough sells. So they scrapped the series. Hopefully not indefinitely.
Avatar image for byterunner
byterunner

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By byterunner

common guys, Nintendo doesn't do things at money lost for anything. Of course the compensation is less then eventful (really, it depends on the last 10 games they announce) though, those GBA games look pretty good IMO.

Avatar image for byterunner
byterunner

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By byterunner
@valrog said:
@jorbear said:

You make it sound like I would become Geralt The Witcher, which is a pretty easy choice for me.

His example already makes you the Witcher in the first place.
I guess I did romanticize the situation. I wrote it like that because I didn't want people to start think, "well maybe if I was in good health I wouldn't, but why wouldn't I if I was an amputee or of poor health or crippled."  This question is stated that if you have no reason to be augmented(to the point that the only thing it would change for you, would be to become better then a human, not just cure a illness, or any other reason), IE: You are relatively smart, fairly athletic, and in good health, basically enough to live comfortably for the rest of your human life. Yet you were giving the opportunity to become augmented, would you do it?
Avatar image for byterunner
byterunner

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By byterunner
@AuthenticM said:

@McGhee_the_Insomniac said:

"Give up your humanity". What does that even mean? Does someone in a wheelchair give up their humanity? What about someone with a prosthetic leg? These are people using technology to improve the quality of their lives. If the technology existed that would increase performance far beyond the norm, then why shouldn't someone do it?

I see no moral problem with such augmentations. It only comes down to weighing the pros and the cons.

Unless I was a soldier I would see little need for physical improvements, but if I could safely implant a chip in my head that would improve my mental function? Absolutely I would do it. Imagine downloading a foreign language and instantly being able to speak like a native speaker. That would be amazing.

Pretty much what this guy said.

Don't let Hollywood and Christian/Purist propaganda cloud your judgment. There is no such thing as "giving up" your humanity. Your body does not make you human; your conscience and memories do. As long as those are intact, and I still look humanoid, then hell yeah, I would augment the fuck out of myself.

 
Except, I'm not. I'm not posting this because I think you should be purist, in fact I think the opposite, but I just wanted to know of others opinions. It intrigues me and I believe everyone has a personal opinion on it.
Avatar image for byterunner
byterunner

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By byterunner
@McGhee_the_Insomniac said:

"Give up your humanity". What does that even mean? Does someone in a wheelchair give up their humanity? What about someone with a prosthetic leg? These are people using technology to improve the quality of their lives. If the technology existed that would increase performance far beyond the norm, then why shouldn't someone do it?

I see no moral problem with such augmentations. It only comes down to weighing the pros and the cons.

Unless I was a soldier I would see little need for physical improvements, but if I could safely implant a chip in my head that would improve my mental function? Absolutely I would do it. Imagine downloading a foreign language and instantly being able to speak like a native speaker. That would be amazing.

Simply because you aren't really a human anymore. You aren't made of flesh, you aren't naturally made any more. You are a factory made cyborg pretty much. And yes there are great advantages, but you are not a human. If you become fully augmented, nothing about your body is natural from the world. You are created to become pretty much a machine. One with emotions (presumably). And yes, if you have conditions like you say, then that's fine. But that was not what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about someone who would do it, because if they don't they wont live, or they wont be able to do things most other humans can. (amputees, paraplegics, etc.) So that's why in my post I specifically stated that wasn't part of the equation I asked. I wanted to know if you were perfectly normal and healthy, would you be willing to sacrifice what made you a human (out side of emotions. I not saying you become robots, just not being a human) would you do it?
Avatar image for byterunner
byterunner

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By byterunner
@Yorick said:
Do they have all feeling in their augmentations?
I'd assume, though, maybe not.
Avatar image for byterunner
byterunner

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By byterunner

So, lets play pretend. 
 
You are in the best health of your life. You have no conditions and your heredity shows you are not at risk for anything major. You're well fit and have excellent reflexes. You are smart, and pretty much the ideal human. As close as a human could get. Yep, a human.
 
But, what if you could be more. What if you could be augmented. You've been tested, and you have a incredibly high chance of accepting the augmentations with little issues. But....would you do it.
 
Would you give up basically your humanity, your 'purity' to become something more then a man was ever intended to do. Extend you life close to immortality. Stronger, faster, smarter, more capable then any other human could be. 
 
Let ignore for a moment the whole government controlling you, the drug addiction, and various other issues that are brought up in Dues Ex: Human Revolution. This is strictly a human vs. augmentation contemplation. So, would you remove yourself from humanity to become something....different, but possibly greater?
 
As for me, if I was in that situation, yes. Even if you included all those other factors (gov, drugs, etc). I still do it, if only for my chance to live longer and see what the world will become.

Avatar image for byterunner
byterunner

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By byterunner
@Anwar said:

@TheDudeOfGaming said:

@SomeDeliCook: I agree, self sacrifice is noble, but as you already mentioned, organ donors give their consent, babies who die due to complications or abortion didn't give theirs, nor obviously could they.

Did you know that if a John or Jane Doe is found and nobody finds out after a certain time who they are, they use them in med schools? People being against some random crap and cherrypicking what they don't like always amazes me.

 
 
Or maybe people just don't know about those things. You usually don't find the average person running around looking for information on what med schools use as test dummies. 
 
Not that I mind really, Stem Cell research is fine by me.
Avatar image for byterunner
byterunner

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By byterunner
@creamypies said:

I watched the Quick Look, and still have no idea what you do in that game.

From what I understand this game is all about your journey to some place. This place is never really specified nor does the game really tell you why you are going there. The whole point of your game is for you to experience the middle part of a journey, the real meat of a journey. They wanted you to experience a vast desert world with large amounts of isolationism. There is a large part in isolation in the game and sometimes you will run into one person playing the game at the same time. As with any journey through life, you might meet someone on that journey, and you can decide either to explore with the person, or continue on your way. Like any other journey.
 
It isn't the start or end points of a journey that are the best or most important, its the middle.

At least, that's my understanding of the game. 
 
Also, they'll probably have some kind of anti grieving measures, They have tried really hard to prevent people from annoying you. Like no voice communications and limited jumping allowed. So yeah we will see. But I am very interested and excited about this game. 
Avatar image for byterunner
byterunner

348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By byterunner

yeah, but its a pretty tight schedule
 
here is one
 
http://www.gamefaqs.com/ps2/945498-shin-megami-tensei-persona-4/faqs/55038