PC is by far the best, but that said i got it for 360 cause my PC couldn't run it and i had a VERY good time with it. It is a great game no matter the system you play it on.
that said, to answer your question, i'd get it for 360 over ps3 due to less pop-in and better frame rate (but as said elsewhere, PS3 does have slightly better textures, prolly the reason it has poor frame rate)
i'm sorry to hear they cut something out of the game for being too good... prolly had something to do with a character going crazy, the military is very touchy when it comes to the mental health of their soldiers.
one of the main aspects of the single player is authenticity, i hope that is the case with the multiplayer also. one of my biggest gripes with MW2 was it was way to crazy, unlike CoD 4 which had a dark semi-real "feel" to it.
alright, so the dude in the pic is from the NCR, he carries an NCR flag, why would someone else be carrying the flag? next, the dude in the pic is NOT the player character. the player character is shot at the start of the game and buried, then dug up by a robot. the start of this trailer shows the player's body being dug out of the ground, and it is not possible to be in 2 places at once.
why is everyone being to picky over the use of the same engine? sure it has the same engine, and sure it is using a few of the same skins, but big fucking deal! many, MANY sequels use the same engine as the predecessor, and the skins so far i have seen them re-using were among the better skins to begin with, like the leather armour and basic super mutant. The simple fact of the matter is, this is a whole new game, with a good number of core changes to gameplay, a new story, and a new location. It will be similar to Fallout 3 but shouldn't a sequel be similar anyway? If you liked Fallout 3 you will like this, if you didn't, chances are you won't like new vegas either.
on another note, yea im hyped for hard core, gunna do it on my 2nd playthrough though.
It's true, fallout 3 is nothing but dirt, rocks, and ruins, but it does its dirt, rocks, and ruins very well. :p Additionally, i think fallout 3 is a game you need to play to properly appreciate. The atmosphere is what makes the game, and you cannot experience that by reading reviews or watching a few gameplay videos. However, i can agree that the New Vegas setting does look a little more diverse and lively.
@deathface123: you're never really lost in Dragon Age, it's not like oblivion where you are just sorta thrown out into the world to fend for yourself, you have set goals, and a set quest pretty much.
Log in to comment