Something went wrong. Try again later

gesi1223

This user has not updated recently.

266 111 10 3
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

gesi1223's forum posts

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#1  Edited By gesi1223

@Agent47 said:

@gesi1223: You're right it's probably a little more than $1000, and if consoles were made just like PCs than yeah they would need to be replaced every 5 or so years.But they are not so theres no need.I'm assuming these goliath like companies dump all their money into the highest cutting edge tech at their development cycle so it lasts.

So you're telling me you'd need to spend $1000+ on 2009-2011 PC components to run a game that can play on a "PC" from 2005? Are you looking in the right place? I sure as hell didn't need to spend that much on my PC to have this game run even better than on an xbox.

With this post you seem pretty ignorant, i'm gonna guess you're either really that stupid, or just trying to troll.

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#2  Edited By gesi1223

@PrivateIronTFU said:

@LordLOC said:

@gesi1223 said:

@Voxel said:

@paulunga said:

So hey, this is update no. 6 on my experience with Skyrim:

-PC version 1.1 with automatic steam updates turned off

-40 hours in

-Tons of mods

-Still no bugs

Basically what I'm saying is, fuck anyone who plays this game on a console because you really should've known better. I'm using a Xbox 360 controller btw.

You're right. I should have invested $1000 in a computer capable of running the game well instead of paying $60 for the 360 version, which by the way runs just fine. Silly me! You'd think I would have known better.

Skyrim doesnt require $1000 to run on a PC if it can run on 6 or 7 year old hardware like the xbox360.

Not to mention Skyrim is still using the Gamebryo engine. It's just renamed the Creation engine by Bethesda this go round.

Okay, we get it, people. The $1000 remark is not the point of his comment. The point is, guy who tells 360 people to fuck themselves is an asshole. Stop being nerds.

By the way, I'm playing on 360, and have experienced no bugs. So fuck you right back.

"Stop being nerds."? Dunno what is so nerdy about saying someone doesn't need to spend a grand to get a PC just as good as an xbox360 or ps3. I call that good shopping advice.

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#3  Edited By gesi1223

@Voxel said:

@paulunga said:

So hey, this is update no. 6 on my experience with Skyrim:

-PC version 1.1 with automatic steam updates turned off

-40 hours in

-Tons of mods

-Still no bugs

Basically what I'm saying is, fuck anyone who plays this game on a console because you really should've known better. I'm using a Xbox 360 controller btw.

You're right. I should have invested $1000 in a computer capable of running the game well instead of paying $60 for the 360 version, which by the way runs just fine. Silly me! You'd think I would have known better.

Skyrim doesnt require $1000 to run on a PC if it can run on 6 or 7 year old hardware like the xbox360.

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#4  Edited By gesi1223

@Doctorchimp: I'm having fun, doing my thing. Definitely more fun than playing Skyrim, that's for sure.

It doesn't really matter what you had fun with in the game. I don't care. I'm more concerned with the fact people defend this game's flaws like they're not there and say this game is really good, when in turn it's very mediocre. And the fact Bethesda has been releasing games so poorly put together like this for over 5 years and people accept it is starting to get really grating.

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#5  Edited By gesi1223

@Doctorchimp: The difference is Rockstar tries to give you gameplay that is also enjoyable. Bethesda doesn't even seem like they're trying.

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#6  Edited By gesi1223

The people defending Skyrim like it's actually well put together video game make me wonder what we'll be getting in the next 5 years of games. Hopefully not the same thing, but who knows? "Hardcore gamers" will buy anything these days.

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#7  Edited By gesi1223

A big emmersive world would be much more fun to explore if the 'vehicle' you used to get around it wasn't a piece of shit.

Personally, if i'm going to be playing a game, i'd want the gameplay to be something to enjoy as well as the setting it's put into. Obviously we're never going to get that out of a Bethesda game though, so oh well I just won't buy anything from them anymore.

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#8  Edited By gesi1223

@RobertOrri said:

I am still working on Demon's Souls before I even so much as dip a finger into this one.

Same. Had Demon's Souls for 5 months already and have barely even scratched the surface on it. Very far from even touching this new one..

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#9  Edited By gesi1223

i never had a problem with the original ICO box art. Not saying it's good, but nothing to complain about really since I played the demo before I ever saw the game in stores and knew it would have been great.

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#10  Edited By gesi1223
@ThePilgrums: I think you forgot about No More Heroes.