Gamestop is scummy, no doubt. Opening something and selling it as new is the issue, and is a poor business practice. Removal of an item that was included without their knowledge that promotes a competitor is hardly as bad. Especially if they had no idea it was going to be included, which I believe as reports of the OnLive deal did not show up until the game shipped. The correct approach would have been to refuse to sell the game, period. Which is what they should have done, and gone after Square-Enix for including it.
Finally, I am disappointed in Giant Bomb and Alex for the tone and content of this article. It appeared GB was trying to take strides to be seen as a 'serious' gaming news outlet. Posting an article like this undermines that greatly. It reeks of fanboyism you expect to find on some third rate website. If you want to be taken seriously, you have news and editorials clearly marked. The right thing to do would have been to post the story, and then have a post by Alex titled 'Gamestop Sucks' or whatever. Crossing the line between news and hit piece may get cheering from the haters, but is not a good business policy either. Just like opening items and selling them as new....
Log in to comment