test0r

I'll join in as well. Need to get in some practice.

Since they are not localizing and only releasing digitally I'm baffled that they aren't putting this out in Europe as well.

It would be amazing if they just included two steel balls aswell.

" @test0r said:

" ID was conjured up by religious people who'd like religion to be taught in schools.  You can believe in creation and evolution, you can't believe in ID and evolution.    Oh, and I don't believe in ID, or god for that matter. "

Sure you can. There is micro and macro evolution. I believe in micro evolution and creation.  "

It's probaly a hickup to one of the edge servers. 
 
Post a traceroute to media.giantbomb.com and smedia.giantbomb.com, you do this by running cmd.exe (just type it into the search bar on the start menu), a black window will open. 
In it type tracert media.giantbomb.com & tracert smedia.giantbomb.com 
 
What you should see is something like this: 
     
 Dont worry about the text, look at the ms values to the left, as you can see it's a fairly even increase until it hits the last server and there aren't too many jumps.  
 If, however, one of the ms values shot up to, in my case, 220 or so, it would indicate that that server might be overloaded. Which would explain why it's not working. 
  
Also, there isn't a single server that everyone is using, Whiskey Media is paying Amazon for use of their CDN service, which should, in theory, allow anyone in the world to be able to access their videos from servers that are nearby and fast. 

" @Sargus:   What utter nonsense.  If men have nipples simply because their mothers do, then why should they not also develop breasts or ovaries?  While one could explain male nipples without evolution (though not with evidence, obviously), the set-up you've offered is patently absurd.  The distinction between micro- and macro-evolution is also ridiculous, but I don't intend to argue that point so much as correct your apologetics.  The creationist position is generally that it was each "kind" required.  You have it backwards, as there are far more species than "kinds."  Also, two of each is pretty inaccurate.  Fourteen was the required number for any clean animal.  Granted, I consider it all a load of bollocks, but if you want to offer the Judeo-Christian spin, it helps to have read the damned book. "

" @Video_Game_King said:

" I think the obvious answer is "no." If there was a truly intelligent designer, why would men have nipples? Babies don't drink from dude nipples, so what the hell are those things for? "

You actually don't need evolution to explain away nipples in men (I'm not saying it's not because of evolution, just that you don't need it). That's just a simple matter of genetics. I.E., women have nipples, children inherit genes from both parents, as a result, women's children have nipples. Even if you were to assume that the world began with one man, Adam, and one woman, Eve, and you assumed that Adam wasn't created with nipples (as indeed he wouldn't have needed to be), then you would still see the path leading to nipples in men.  I don't think I've actually met even a hardcore creationist who doesn't accept basic genetic principles like this. In fact, from my understanding, most creationist are fully willing to accept micro-evolution, just not macro-evolution (the evolution from one species into another). It's actually how many of them explain Noah's Ark - Noah didn't need every kind of animal, just two from each general species, which split up over time. "