@AhmadMetallic said:
Thing is, the weakest thing about those "games" is their "game"play, from what I hear and from my Bioshock 1 impressions, which means the gameplay surely did not age well, so why would anyone buy Bioshock games in 2012?
Also I hate to sound like a hater but Spec Ops is a movie that isn't worth more than five bucks.
The first Bioshock still holds up tremendously well. It's not the best shooter out there, but it certainly gets the job done, and it hasn't really aged that much. It still feels relatively modern.
Bioshock 2 was a terrible game when it released, and is still a terrible game (Before anyone asks, a boring, unnecessary story, and the most uninspired and dull level design I've seen in quite a while, with only a few redeeming moments like the theme park ride, and the little sister bit) so no one should buy that. Even with that, the problems aren't from a gameplay perspective, and the actual shooting and plasmids controlled super well, much better than the first.
Yeah, they're story games, but in Bioshock 1's case, excellent story games. If they were still $60 a pop, it'd be a tough sell, but at $5 each it's an impressive bargain.
Also: You do sound like a "hater". And I don't even like to use that word. In fact, I feel kind of dirty now.
Log in to comment