Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

70 Comments

Assassin's Creed: Revelations Review

4
  • X360

The laws of diminishing returns have started to affect Assassin’s Creed, and while Revelations doesn’t quite live up to the promise of its subtitle, there’s still plenty to like about what may be Ezio Auditore’s final adventure.

Istanbul. Or Constantinople. Whatever!
Istanbul. Or Constantinople. Whatever!

Last year’s release of Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood came saddled with concerns that Ubisoft was too quick to capitalize on the success of Assassin’s Creed II, a terrific adventure that went to great lengths to address the issues of elegance and repetition of the still-ambitious original. Brotherhood allayed these concerns with meaningful additions to both the gameplay and the story, and a general sense of cohesion that you might not expect from a game of such scope turned around in just one year’s time. Now we have Assassin’s Creed: Revelations, the third game in the series in as many years. The production values are as strong as ever, and it retains most of the tricks that kept Brotherhood from feeling like an also-ran, like the ability to build your own assassin’s guild and a surprisingly engaging suite of multiplayer modes. The additions Revelations makes on top of those features, though, don’t feel quite as essential to the experience, sometimes adding complication just for the sake of it. Assassin’s Creed: Revelations, the name alone, suggests a certain amount of closure, but the greater Assassin’s Creed story feels like it’s starting to spin its wheels.

Let me just say right now, if you’re not current with the Assassin’s Creed series, or if this would be your first Assassin’s Creed game, you should probably stop reading here and get yourself caught up. Though it tries gamely with a quick-cut “previously on...” montage to get folks up to speed, the story of Revelations is so intrinsically tied to the previous games that it makes for a series introduction that’s confusing at best. Desmond Miles, the seemingly mild-mannered bartender whose genetic memory has been the stage for the Assassin’s Creed series up to now, is in a bad way after the events of Brotherhood. Left catatonic, with his mind fragmented between his own experiences, and those of his ancestors Altair and Ezio Auditore, Miles has been jacked back into the Animus as a sort of mental life support. Inside the Animus loading program he meets Subject 16, or at least what’s left of him, who lays out the plot pretty simply: Desmond needs to see Ezio and Altaïr's stories to their conclusion if he ever hopes to wake up.

Templars come in all shapes and sizes.
Templars come in all shapes and sizes.

Even though the entirety of Revelations takes place inside Desmond’s mind, he’s barely a guest star here, with the focus primarily on Ezio, and, to a lesser extent, Altaïr. There is a peculiar set of optional side levels--abstract, awkward, first-person puzzles--you can load up from inside the Animus that offer some insight into Desmond’s back story, albeit in a shockingly dry, casual manner. Most of the time, though, you’re playing as Ezio, now a bearded, weathered old man, whose dogged campaign against the Templars has led him to Constantinople, where he hopes to find a set of five keys necessary to open Altaïr’s library back in Masyaf before the Templars do. There are major subplots in Constantinople concerning political maneuvering within the local Sultan’s family, as well as Ezio’s growing affection for a local book dealer who is assisting him in his search, but other than the typical, largely anonymous Templar forces working against him, there’s not much of a central conflict here--just a task that needs doing.

The keys to Altaïr’s library, it just so happens, are made from the same material as the Apple of Eden, and with each key Ezio finds, he’s given a brief glimpse into Altaïr’s life. (This means that Desmond’s experiences as Altaïr here are twice removed, though the game never gets all Inception with exploring the layering of reality.) Unlike Ezio, who has the full run of Constantinople, the episodes where you play as Altaïr are highly constrained, taking place almost exclusively in and around the guild castle at Masyaf from the first Assassin’s Creed. These sequences aren’t much to play, and though they provide some insight into snippets of Altaïr’s life after the events of Assassin’s Creed, their implications for the fiction at large seem limited. Yes, we know more about Altaïr’s family and his turbulent relationship with his guild, but it all goes by so quickly that it’s hard to get terribly invested. Generally speaking, Revelations is more interested in filling in back story than it is in maintaining forward momentum. There is an ironic paucity of revelations in Revelations.

"Dude, let go of my fannypack!"

It’s much easier to like Revelations if you’re not here for the story, as the fundamental action of dynamic urban traversal and timing-based combat that’s both lightning-quick and thick with arterial spray still feels terrific. With a few, minor exceptions--like the ubiquity of horses--Revelations brings back nearly all of the bells and whistles that helped make Brotherhood so good, such as the ability to cultivate your own assassin’s guild, send assassins out on international assignments, buy up local business for added income, take over Templar strongholds, and take on missions for the local mercenaries and thieves guilds.

On top of all this, Revelations piles on a few of its own systems. Ezio has had one of his standard hidden blades replaced with a locally sourced hookblade, which mostly just makes climbing up sheer buildings a bit faster and allows you to make use of Constantinople’s plentiful, conspicuous ziplines, though it also serves some minor combat and evasion purposes. The combat generally still moves at the same bracing speed as it did in Brotherhood, though you’ll eventually encounter enemies that require slightly more strategy and patience to take down--assuming you don’t just call in your guildmates to finish them off for you. Ezio also gets introduced to the craft of bomb-making, which allows you to combine different types of reagents you find, buy, or steal for different explosive results, which I regularly found quite handy.

Revelations makes a certain effort to unify some of its disparate systems, though by creating interdependencies between the assassin’s dens you establish in Constantinople, Ezio’s current “heat” level with the Templars, and the experience levels of the assassins you’ve been training, it’s more difficult for you to dabble in one while ignoring the others. Basically, if you don’t protect your dens, the Templars can try and steal them back. In order to retain control, you have to play through what is essentially a brief tower defense scenario, placing different types of assassins on rooftops and barriers in the streets to fend off waves of Templar attackers. Or, if you find the tower defense stuff as tedious as I did, you just let the Templars take over, then just sweep back in, murder the Templar captain, and take control again.

Sooner or later, everyone gets stabbed.
Sooner or later, everyone gets stabbed.

If there's one area that Revelations makes some unequivocal improvements over Brotherhood is in the multiplayer, which features more maps, more modes, more playable characters, and more customization options as you level up. Subtle tweaks make it easier to defend against an attacker, and the choice in certain modes to remove the directional radar in favor of a simpler, less explicit proximity meter means you have to pay closer attention to make sure the person you're following is your intended target. If there's a critique, it's that some of the modes can seem a little complicated at first blush, though a training room allows you to familiarize yourself without drawing the ire of Internet Teens.

For the most part, what was great about Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood is still good in Assassin’s Creed: Revelations, but the new stuff doesn’t do much to improve the experience, and all the best moments just feel kind of familiar. Even though the game takes place in an entirely new city, the old-world aesthetic isn’t that radically different. This is probably overstating the shortcomings of Revelations, but when I finished the game I was left concerned about the future of the Assassin’s Creed franchise. Ubisoft seems completely intent on making Assassin’s Creed an annual franchise, and at this rate, I’m afraid it will have exhausted its goodwill before we get to see a proper Assassin’s Creed III.

70 Comments

Avatar image for chrswk
chrswk

5

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By chrswk

I usually buy every AS game on day one. Somehow this has changed with Revelations. Don't know what it is, maybe AS fatigue?

Avatar image for bird02
BIRD02

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By BIRD02

The tower defense stuff is terrible but at least they are trying to keep the game fresh and entertaining. I'd rather deal with the bad then have the game get to repetative.

Avatar image for lingxor
Lingxor

487

Forum Posts

844

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Lingxor

I just don't care about the setting anymore. I want a game dedicated to the present day stuff.

Avatar image for roger778
Roger778

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Roger778

I'm still going to buy this game, because I love the series. However, I'm bummed that the story doesn't seem to be as good as the first 3 game. My only request is that if they make this an annual franchise, at least try to freshen up the gameplay a bit. Other than that, I can't wait to see Altair and Ezio again.

Avatar image for equal_opportunity_destroyer497
Equal_Opportunity_Destroyer497

578

Forum Posts

181

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 15

After playing the first few hours of this, I am right concerned about the future of Assassin's Creed. The tower defense/heat level stuff borders on terrible and the other additions, like the hookblade, are pretty superficial and don't add much to the experience. Frankly I'm bummed. I loved the last two games and was hyped for this one but "meh" additions to the gameplay are really bringing me down. This franchise needs a break but we all know it's not going to get one. I also feel compelled to throw a WTF out there for changing the function of the Y/triangle button after three goddamn games.

Avatar image for bisonhero
BisonHero

12793

Forum Posts

625

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By BisonHero

@jessej07 said:

Slowly but surely Giant Bomb's use of "laws of diminishing returns" has started to irk me. It's the law of diminishing returns, and it doesn't exactly apply to video games in the way that it is said to on many a Bombcast.

If the case were made that so many people worked on the Assassin's Creed series to the point that design choices appear to be convoluted or confusing, then the law of diminishing returns applies. Too much of a good thing in a game to the point where it becomes less enjoyable has nothing to do with the law of diminishing returns; this would be more aptly described as "cloying" (which happens to be my least favorite word). The argument that too many similar games (too many Assassin's Creed games, for instance) leads to less enjoyment of the next installment of the similar game also does not apply to the law of diminishing returns. The law refers to factors of input into the end production... we can argue whether the input is Assassin's Creed and the output is your enjoyment, but we would be stretching the principles of economics too far at that point, no?

But, everyone knows what is meant when a GB staffer says "law of diminishing returns" while referring to a game... so I guess my economist mind is just being a nit picking jerk :)

I love GB, just clearing my chest on the internet like a regular sane person.

Don't even get me started on how almost nobody uses "begging the question" in the proper fashion. It isn't actually synonymous with "raising the question", but that usage has gone uncorrected for so long that it's basically a lost battle at this point.

Avatar image for rmanthorp
rmanthorp

4654

Forum Posts

3603

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 14

Edited By rmanthorp  Moderator

INTERNETS

Avatar image for bio595
bio595

320

Forum Posts

59

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By bio595

@megalowho said:

@bio595 said:

@vhold said:

It looks like for Giant Bomb, and many like minded gamers, this is the year of "Very good sequels that we have to acknowledge are awesomely made, but aren't innovative enough to excite us."

For Assassin's Creed I don't need annual innovation. Bi-annual maybe.

In general I don't think that you need innovation to impress. If you've been running in place like Call of Duty, perhaps, but even then it's still fun.

Besides, true innovation is way harder and potentially harmful because customers hardly ever know what they want otherwise they'd have more helpful things to say than "be innovative".

With Assassin's Creed though, I think it would be clear to Ubi the things that would get people genuinely excited - a different time/place in history, a new assassin to control, or some meaningful followup and payoff on Desmond's increasingly drawn out arc. There's been two full games now that don't really touch on any of that stuff. They don't need to reinvent the wheel, innovation alone isn't really what these games need since the gameplay is so refined, but they shouldn't just keep staring at it and spinning it either.

I agree with this counterpoint

Avatar image for colonelt
ColonelT

92

Forum Posts

84

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By ColonelT

Ryan nailed it, again. He really does write the best reviews.

Avatar image for upwardbound
upwarDBound

658

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By upwarDBound

Eh, story's not the main reason I play these games anyway, but I can see the formula getting old from a game play standpoint as well. I hope they really make some great improvements for the next game.

Avatar image for arkasai
arkasai

734

Forum Posts

120

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By arkasai

Ubisoft is slowly killing Assassin's Creed year-by-year.... I finished Brotherhood in like half the time AC2 took me, and played multiplayer for all of one match. Don't add multiplayer to a game unless you're willing to devote an equal amount of time and energy to make it compelling. I would have preferred significantly more single player content at the expense of there being a multiplayer mode, and virtually everyone who likes these games feels the same. I spent more time in virtual training killing dozens of guards and racing against the clock in the free-running challenges than I spent in multiplayer.

Avatar image for dvorak
dvorak

1553

Forum Posts

616

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By dvorak

@CloneTrooper said:

From what I've read over the last few months, Assassin's Creed III was potentially going to be the last yearly iteration of the franchise for awhile.

I think they've gone for this model because they want to be able to release the true third part of the series in 2012, because that's when it all takes place blah blah.

I honestly thought that this game was going to be the Assassin's Creed III we were waiting for after the ending of the last one, but after they announced Revelations, I looked at the timeline and realized this was some kind of ultimate marketing strategy for lining the game's crazy world ending 2012 timeline up with the release window.

I'm excited for the possibilities of some kind of alien race or whatever returning to earth for an ultimate mindfuck climax, but I hope its framed up with Desmond smoking and/or stabbing dudes in a modern environment. Something I've wanted since the end of the first game.

Avatar image for steampunkjin
SteamPunkJin

1283

Forum Posts

592

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By SteamPunkJin

This review laid out exactly what I wanted to know about. 
They're dicking around with the story, passing on this and any future games in the series.

Avatar image for probablytuna
probablytuna

5010

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By probablytuna

I'm enjoying it so far. It's not that different from Brotherhood or Assassin's Creed II, but that's not a bad thing at all. However, I hope Assassin's Creed III will bring upon greater changes/improvements (anywhere from combat/gameplay to visual/graphics department).

Avatar image for sooty
Sooty

8193

Forum Posts

306

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By Sooty

@bio595 said:

@vhold said:

It looks like for Giant Bomb, and many like minded gamers, this is the year of "Very good sequels that we have to acknowledge are awesomely made, but aren't innovative enough to excite us."

Call of Duty, perhaps, but even then it's still fun.

no it isn't.

Avatar image for megalowho
megalowho

1148

Forum Posts

4888

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 28

Edited By megalowho

@bio595 said:

@vhold said:

It looks like for Giant Bomb, and many like minded gamers, this is the year of "Very good sequels that we have to acknowledge are awesomely made, but aren't innovative enough to excite us."

For Assassin's Creed I don't need annual innovation. Bi-annual maybe.

In general I don't think that you need innovation to impress. If you've been running in place like Call of Duty, perhaps, but even then it's still fun.

Besides, true innovation is way harder and potentially harmful because customers hardly ever know what they want otherwise they'd have more helpful things to say than "be innovative".

With Assassin's Creed though, I think it would be clear to Ubi the things that would get people genuinely excited - a different time/place in history, a new assassin to control, or some meaningful followup and payoff on Desmond's increasingly drawn out arc. There's been two full games now that don't really touch on any of that stuff. They don't need to reinvent the wheel, innovation alone isn't really what these games need since the gameplay is so refined, but they shouldn't just keep staring at it and spinning it either.

Avatar image for megalowho
megalowho

1148

Forum Posts

4888

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 28

Edited By megalowho

I would feel much better about spending $60 on incremental Assassin's Creed sequels if they actually delivered meaningful, interesting plot advancements to make up for the gameplay and setting fatigue. Hence, "Revelations." But just like Brotherhood, this game seems to tell a story that could probably be distilled into a cutscene or two during a more meaningful entry in the series, if it even had to be told at all.

This whole series, which has an interesting premise and thousands of years of history to draw upon as source material, seems to be content with being a drawn out cocktease when it comes to meaningful story beats with small drips of exposition here and there. I"m sure it's still quite fun to stab dudes, climb towers and mess around in these old cities. I'm just not sure if Ubisoft deserves my money for an unnecessary but competent game I never asked for. At least not at $60 they don't.

Avatar image for jessej07
jessej07

233

Forum Posts

302

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Edited By jessej07

Slowly but surely Giant Bomb's use of "laws of diminishing returns" has started to irk me. It's the law of diminishing returns, and it doesn't exactly apply to video games in the way that it is said to on many a Bombcast.

If the case were made that so many people worked on the Assassin's Creed series to the point that design choices appear to be convoluted or confusing, then the law of diminishing returns applies. Too much of a good thing in a game to the point where it becomes less enjoyable has nothing to do with the law of diminishing returns; this would be more aptly described as "cloying" (which happens to be my least favorite word). The argument that too many similar games (too many Assassin's Creed games, for instance) leads to less enjoyment of the next installment of the similar game also does not apply to the law of diminishing returns. The law refers to factors of input into the end production... we can argue whether the input is Assassin's Creed and the output is your enjoyment, but we would be stretching the principles of economics too far at that point, no?

But, everyone knows what is meant when a GB staffer says "law of diminishing returns" while referring to a game... so I guess my economist mind is just being a nit picking jerk :)

I love GB, just clearing my chest on the internet like a regular sane person.

Avatar image for professoress
ProfessorEss

7962

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By ProfessorEss

I'm sure I will personally get 5 stars worth of enjoyment with this one but I agree, Assassin's Creed (like so many other franchises) is doing itself a disservice by insisting on trying to be an annual franchise.

Avatar image for dropabombonit
dropabombonit

1543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By dropabombonit

Great review, I'm going top pick this up at Christmas because I have done that with every AC game since AC2. Also get AC1 free on the PS3 version (even though that game is a 7/10 at best)

Avatar image for humanity
Humanity

21858

Forum Posts

5738

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 16

Edited By Humanity

The fighting practically hasn't changed in the past two games so if the story isn't strong were in trouble. I've had my fair share of stabbing people and climbing up two story shanties. Lets hope Hitman is going to be as great as it looks so I can refresh my assassin needs.

Avatar image for clonetrooper
CloneTrooper

23

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

Edited By CloneTrooper

From what I've read over the last few months, Assassin's Creed III was potentially going to be the last yearly iteration of the franchise for awhile.

I think they've gone for this model because they want to be able to release the true third part of the series in 2012, because that's when it all takes place blah blah.

But yeah, Im enjoying it at the moment....and I love the franchise, but Renaissance Period is done, and it needs to either focus more on the Modern Side of the story and/or choose something as far removed from the Renaissance as you can get to spice up the series and really get the fans back.

On a completely different note, Ubisoft have pretty much squandered the goodwill the got with Project Legacy...it still has DDS 2.0 as "coming soon", but there's been no word on it for at least 7 months. Its a real shame because it had great potential to explore more of the universe, but its almost like they've abandoned it. Shame Ubi, shame.

Avatar image for eyz
Eyz

469

Forum Posts

44

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Eyz

Can hardly wait to grab my copy...this December during my holidays break :/

Avatar image for rekt_hed
Rekt_Hed

958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 8

Edited By Rekt_Hed

The fact that this went on sale day 1 in Sainsburys for £32 or $50 was kind of telling. Think I'm gonna hold of on this for now I've really got no time between Batman and U3 still. Plus I went and bought Bully after the bombcast just gone.

When I need to get my 'uh uh uh uh' on though ill pick this up

Avatar image for meatball
MEATBALL

4235

Forum Posts

790

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Edited By MEATBALL

After Brotherhood I decided to shut my yapper about the yearly release cycle until they screw up, it's a shame that it sounds like it only took them one more iteration. Not to say it sounds like a bad game, it sounds like it's another enjoyable Assassin's Creed game, just that it might be getting a little tired and too iterative, with the biggest changes not proving to be positive additions. This doesn't bode well for what will probably be Assassin's Creed "3" next year.

Avatar image for kerse
kerse

2496

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By kerse

I'll be playing this, but if the next game isn't called Assassin's Creed 3 and still has the same engine I might be done, no matter how much I liked the story.

Avatar image for cornman89
Cornman89

1600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Cornman89

Think I'll pass on Revelations. I enjoyed Brotherhood (at a reduced price point), but goddammit, Ubisoft needs to get moving with the 2012 stuff.

Avatar image for dynamix
dynamix

407

Forum Posts

22

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By dynamix

@Besetment said:

"It’s much easier to like Revelations if you’re not here for the story"

In Bizarro-world Ubisoft would put this quote on the box.

Avatar image for javes
Javes

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Javes

'It’s much easier to like Revelations if you’re not here for the story'. This is a bit troubling. Frankly, the only reason I'm interested in the AC series at this point is the story. The combat is mind-numbingly easy and at game #4 using the same gameplay mechanics I'm a little burned out. Just a rental to experience the storyline for me.

Avatar image for besetment
Besetment

650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Besetment

"It’s much easier to like Revelations if you’re not here for the story,"

Yep. That convinced me not to buy this game.

Avatar image for undeadpool
Undeadpool

8418

Forum Posts

10761

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 18

Edited By Undeadpool

@Rheinmetall said:

Istanbul or Constantinople: it's the same because Constantinople was a wonder city of the Medieval times and was often called: The Polis (Greek word for The City) "Istanbul" is essentially the corrupted form of the phrase: Is tin Polin (To the City) Then "Is- tin- Polin" became "Is - tan -bul" in Turkish.

Avatar image for chem
chem

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By chem
Avatar image for rheinmetall
Rheinmetall

179

Forum Posts

504

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 6

Edited By Rheinmetall

Istanbul or Constantinople: it's the same because Constantinople was a wonder city of the Medieval times and was often called: The Polis (Greek word for The City) "Istanbul" is essentially the corrupted form of the phrase: Is tin Polin (To the City) Then "Is- tin- Polin" became "Is - tan -bul" in Turkish.

Avatar image for maddprodigy
MaddProdigy

1074

Forum Posts

178

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By MaddProdigy

You know, 5 months ago when I saw all these sequels coming out, I was EXTREMELY excited. Now I am burned out as hell. Very incremental changes have cost a lot of series a lot of ground. Still very great, but I need some new gameplay and I need it soon.

It's time for a new generation, and new starts to many franchises.

Edit: They better not have focused on Desmond at all because the next game is going to be about him, with sweet futuristic assassinations and such.

Avatar image for rheinmetall
Rheinmetall

179

Forum Posts

504

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 6

Edited By Rheinmetall

It would better be Ezzio's last adventure. Altair is Assassin's Creed for me, he only.

Avatar image for clumsyninja1
clumsyninja1

856

Forum Posts

35

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

Edited By clumsyninja1

The tower defense mini-game is terrible. Sooo annoying.

Avatar image for rsistnce
RsistncE

4498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RsistncE

I personally feel as if the law of diminishing returns kicked in with Assassin's Creed II, I guess that's why I felt that Assassins Creed I was a better game just because it felt more unique when it came out. Either way, look at those screenshots: all that airbrushing to make the game look better puts Playboy to shame.

Avatar image for xxrangaxx
XxRANGAxX

309

Forum Posts

99

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By XxRANGAxX

I need to finish brotherhood, I want to finish brotherhood and i must now stop reading this review before I ruin more of brotherhoods story.......FUCK found out how it ended -_-

Avatar image for p_pigly_hogswine
P_Pigly_Hogswine

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By P_Pigly_Hogswine

I'm going to pass on this one. Absolutely adored AC1, really liked AC2 despite not loving Ezio, gave Brotherhood a shot but it ultimately became the first in the series I still haven't completed. Just didn't excite me for some reason. I really hope AC3 is a well-crafted closer to the first two. I'm a bit worried about the tendency for annual releases so far.

Avatar image for moelarrycurly
moelarrycurly

731

Forum Posts

67

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 11

Edited By moelarrycurly

@deathstriker666 said:

@iAmJohn said:

@Artie said:

I heard that Istanbul is not Constantinople.

Why did Constantinople get the works?

Something something Turks

... That's nobody's business but the Turks.

Avatar image for deathstriker666
deathstriker666

1349

Forum Posts

19

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By deathstriker666

@iAmJohn said:

@Artie said:

I heard that Istanbul is not Constantinople.

Why did Constantinople get the works?

Something something Turks

Avatar image for cybexx
Cybexx

1697

Forum Posts

1458

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Edited By Cybexx

That is unfortunate that the story isn't that great as it is what I was looking forward to the most. I wonder if Patrice Désilets departure has had them scrabbling a bit and with this game they are in a "holding position" story-wise until they have things figured out. I really do hope they've had a team working on Assassin's Creed III for the last year as this series needs some major mechanical changes and a brand new time period.

I'm sure I will enjoy this game a decent amount though and I am looking forward to playing the multiplayer, I feel a little guilty for not playing more of Brotherhood's multiplayer since it was so good.

Avatar image for 234rqsd2323d2
234r2we232

3175

Forum Posts

2007

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 16

Edited By 234r2we232

I could barely finish 2 due to all the awkward mechanics and confusing controls... do the kids still think assassins and hoodies are cool?

Avatar image for draxyle
Draxyle

2021

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Draxyle

@vhold said:

It looks like for Giant Bomb, and many like minded gamers, this is the year of "Very good sequels that we have to acknowledge are awesomely made, but aren't innovative enough to excite us."

Right on the nose. Videogames weren't meant to be taken in annual doses. Too many of these franchises are going to burn out with this desperation to get more games out the door.

That said, I had already felt fatigue with Brotherhood. They're all great games but.. I can't handle that slow of a plot progression that's too slow even for a now-yearly release. Ezio's story is interesting and all, but it's nothing compared to Desmond's story. We're lucky to get maybe a halfhour with him in every game at best. It all screams of just dragging on a story for the sake of dragging it on.

I have to echo the sentiments of being worried for the franchise. It's such a good series, one of the best that can only truly work as a videogame in-fact. There is a definite care to preserving the artistic integrity of these games too. I just hope they don't stuff it out before it rightfully ends.

Avatar image for bkbroiler
bkbroiler

1739

Forum Posts

438

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By bkbroiler

Seems about right. I really hope they don't kill this series.

Avatar image for kamikazecaterpillar
KamikazeCaterpillar

1160

Forum Posts

1705

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

I never thought I would say this after AC2, but I'm growing really tired of this series.

Avatar image for vorbis
Vorbis

2762

Forum Posts

967

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By Vorbis

Will mirror the "it doesn't need to be an annual release" comments.

I loved Brotherhood but I'm not picking this up until there is nothing else to play.

Avatar image for jeust
Jeust

11739

Forum Posts

15085

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 15

Edited By Jeust

That was to be expected. No one can keep the same show running forever... 

Avatar image for vhold
vhold

577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By vhold

@bio595 said:

For Assassin's Creed I don't need annual innovation. Bi-annual maybe.

In general I don't think that you need innovation to impress. If you've been running in place like Call of Duty, perhaps, but even then it's still fun.

Besides, true innovation is way harder and potentially harmful because customers hardly ever know what they want otherwise they'd have more helpful things to say than "be innovative".

To clarify my thought, I think that.. Giant Bomb is impressed with these new highly refined games, they just aren't _excited_ about them. That's why they keep giving out 4 stars and saying things along the lines of "Eh, it's more of the same, it's better, but still, if you've played the previous game, maybe this isn't worth your money or your time." This season in particular, with a few exceptions, they seem to be slogging their way through the blockbuster games for the purpose of reviewing them without ever getting hooked. They're giving props to all of the games' creative assets, but not to the gameplay.

Also, to respond to your last part, it's not the customers' responsibility to figure out what would excite them in a video game It's still a perfectly valid criticism to say a video game was "Meh" even if they don't figure out how to improve it. As long as the reviewer doesn't lie about their experience with the game it's all fair.