Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

66 Comments

Monday Night Combat Review

4
  • XBGS

For $15, there's an awful lot of varied, satisfying multiplayer action in here.


 So many classes, so few robots to kill with them.
 So many classes, so few robots to kill with them.
Blacklight: Tango Down recently attempted to bring the Call of Duty style of team-based multiplayer action to Xbox Live in an inexpensive, small-scale package, but for my money, Monday Night Combat is the low-priced multiplayer game to beat. To be fair, it wasn't my money--the game's developer provided us with review access--but for $15, there's a great degree of depth and variety in Monday Night Combat that's really satisfying to wrap your head around.

The easy shorthand for this game is "Team Fortress 2 meets Defense of the Ancients," the sort of lazy description I'd normally shy away from if it weren't so damn accurate. It's got the exaggerated art style and broad mix of specialized classes from the former, and the battlefield layout and gameplay flow of the latter. Turns out, those are in fact two multiplayer tastes that taste grea... well, let's say the developer has done a great job of integrating those two halves into a cohesive whole.

As you might guess from the name, Monday Night Combat is shot through with the feel of a futuristic death sport, and the main competitive mode, Crossfire, is set up in a six-on-six format. Each team has a goal called the moneyball to defend back at their base, with a bunch of nodes scattered around it where you can cash in money you pick up to build turrets that shoot lasers, rockets, mortars, or enemy-slowing freeze rays. You can also spend that money on upgrades for your own character, so there's a constant balancing act between helping out your team's defenses and boosting your own combat prowess. Both tactics pay off in different ways; the challenge is mostly in knowing when it's best to use which one.

 Knowing when and how to upgrade your abilities is a big part of the strategy.
 Knowing when and how to upgrade your abilities is a big part of the strategy.
Like DOTA, you've got an endless supply of AI-controlled robots spawning in your base and marching toward your enemy's--and they have the same thing going on over on the other side of the map. Only these robots can bring down the shields on the moneyball and allow you to attack it directly, so every match starts with the two waves of robots clashing in the middle of the map and then the line of battle moving toward one base or the other depending on the particulars of the two teams' strategies. In addition to turrets and your own abilities, you can spend your cash to generate additional waves of robots, which is a good way to overwhelm the enemy through sheer attrition.

With all these options, it's immensely satisfying to set up workable defenses, mix your classes properly, work together, and progressively push the line of conflict forward. Conversely it's frustrating as hell when your team doesn't know what it's doing and everyone runs around aimlessly while a coordinated enemy steamrolls right over you. In short, the game is subject to the same strict requirement to know what the hell you're doing as every other team-based game, but you can't really hold that against the game itself. It has a high learning curve, but there are really extensive video and text tutorials to ramp you up quickly.

There are also a lot of options in how you play, with six classes that fall into standard team-based archetypes. Here, let me list them and let's see if you can tell roughly what role they're supposed to fill. Assault, sniper, gunner, assassin, support, tank. Self-explanatory, right? Each class has two weapons and several neat abilities: the support can heal teammates and call down airstrikes, the assassin can dash and cloak for stealth kills, the gunner can do a ground-pound slam attack and turn himself into a living turret. A big part of successful strategy is getting everyone to play their class well and use their abilities to complement each other and form a united front.

Dude, you might want to watch that moneyball...
Dude, you might want to watch that moneyball...
If you want a break from Crossfire, there's also the Blitz mode, which is basically Crossfire with only one team. It's tower defense. You and up to three others hold off wave after wave of robots spawning from different locations by building turrets, upgrading your abilities, and scrambling frantically. There are increasing difficulty levels of Blitz to go through, and it feels different enough from Crossfire to warrant its status as a separate mode. I had a ton of fun with Blitz, other than one distinctly bug-like instance where a particular round never seemed to end, spewing so many robots that the game bogged down until it was unplayable.

That wasn't the only questionable spot I ran into. As good as the core concepts in Monday Night Combat are, this is at times a rough-looking game. The frame rate can dip to almost unmanageable levels when there's too much going on. There are some weird animation bugs; character models who catch on fire or have angels circling their heads during a stun tend to retain those graphical effects long after the debuffs themselves have expired. And the general user experience feels a bit shoddy, with some design elements that pop from low to high resolution when you change menus, some fonts that don't fit very well in their containers, and the like. It's nothing that makes the game less fun overall, but it does give the impression that the game was built fairly quickly by a small team, which it was.

That's also Monday Night Combat's strength, though; it's lean, cheap, and focused, but it still offers a great multiplayer formula that feels like more than its component parts. Get a few friends together who are ready to learn the ins and outs of the available classes and tactics, and there's enough depth here to keep you playing for a good long while after you've gotten your $15 worth.
Brad Shoemaker on Google+

66 Comments

Avatar image for kear
Kear

112

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Kear

Spot on, Brad.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b43dadb9061b
deactivated-5b43dadb9061b

1649

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Dad_Is_A_Zombie said:
" Already got (and love) TF2. Don't see a need to spend $15 on this... "
Thanks for letting us know!
Avatar image for epicreflex
EpicReflex

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By EpicReflex

Looked good from  the quick look. Not interested in investing in a MP game though with SCII to play now and Reach in the near future.

Avatar image for fisk0
fisk0

7321

Forum Posts

74197

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 75

Edited By fisk0  Moderator

I hope they'll release a PC version.

Avatar image for liquidswords
LiquidSwords

2728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By LiquidSwords

Dat Brad!

Avatar image for hadestimes
HadesTimes

969

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 8

Edited By HadesTimes

I agree the game is great.  But they really need to make sure to keep updating the game; otherwise two months from now, there will only be crickets playing it.

Avatar image for themasterds
TheMasterDS

3018

Forum Posts

7716

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 31

Edited By TheMasterDS

I would describe it more like "Battlefield Heroes meets DOTA" or "Class based Call of Duty meets DOTA" because it handles absolutely nothing like TF2.

Avatar image for pk_koopa
PK_Koopa

593

Forum Posts

77

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By PK_Koopa

I bought the game before the review and I'm loving it. I'm glad Brad agrees.

Avatar image for stupot
Stupot

182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Stupot

Downloaded this on release and have been playing constantly since. Apart from a few balance issues (support and gunner) the game is balanced out very well. I hope it gets some more attention and downloads so the multiplayer will last long than a month.

Avatar image for paraparaking
ParaParaKing

129

Forum Posts

12036

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 11

Edited By ParaParaKing

Why is it that if a game is short people don't want to talk about the price, but if there is a lot of content they praise the "low" price?

Avatar image for teaspoon83
Teaspoon83

632

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Teaspoon83

After playing the 30 minutes of the trial/demo, I decided to pick it up. It really is a unique game out there. Sure, somebody could go around and mod TF2 to play like this, but this on XBLA is great.

Avatar image for jim_dandy
jim_dandy

885

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jim_dandy

Touchin' dat moneyball.

Avatar image for dad_is_a_zombie
Dad_Is_A_Zombie

1244

Forum Posts

877

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Dad_Is_A_Zombie

Already got (and love) TF2. Don't see a need to spend $15 on this...

Avatar image for fedorajay
fedorajay

326

Forum Posts

36

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By fedorajay

I'd buy it if it had full bot support. I'm fully aware of it's single player mode but I'd love to play the main mode with bots like you can with DotA. I don't think it's worth it at this time to cave in and pay for Live, though.

Avatar image for vinchenzo
Vinchenzo

6461

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 2

Edited By Vinchenzo

Okie dokie.