Something went wrong. Try again later

Hamz

Does this shit still work?

6900 25432 432 98585
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Hamz's forum posts

Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

98585

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#1  Edited By Hamz

PS4 seems like the logical choice, even though Sony has had some bad press lately the PS3 itself has still stayed firmly in a positive light. Playstation as a brand of console is a strong name and to a certain extent it helps keep past and present gamers familiar with the brand and its games.

Plenty of kids who owned an original PS system can associate familiarity and nostalgia to Playstation consoles as they grew up moving from PS1 to PS2 and PS3 etc.

Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

98585

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#2  Edited By Hamz

Always felt the ability to "retire" from adventuring and just buy a plot of in-game land to build a farm, homestead or shop would be a fun break away from the very combat focused nature of most MMO's. Being able to set up a shop and sell stuff to other players such as ingredients or potions etc would be a nice change of pace. Allowing players to branch into a more merchant or economy driven nature would be cool, especially if you could sort of give quests to other players through a form of in-game bulletin board.

"From Hamz, offering 100g for stacks of 10 wolf pelts" sort of thing.

Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

98585

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#3  Edited By Hamz

Stereotypes. That's all it is.

You have the gold digger, the bitter ex-wife, the "mature" mother who's single and insecure about dying alone, you have the girlfriend who expects to be wined and dined on her man's money and then the potential wives/fiancées who try to tame their man into their ideal husband.

You'll find most comedies are successful because they use stereotypes. Look at The Big Bang Theory, they do it just as much. Friends did it, Frasier did it and umpteen other comedies.

Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

98585

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By Hamz

The entire purpose of any Quick Look is to provide an unscripted, on the fly and initial "knee-jerk" reaction from the staff. They are not there to provide a run down of an entire game and all its parts, that's what a review is for.

And as is the nature with most MMO style games, they are difficult to show off as the entire purpose of them is to enjoy an experience made from investing hundreds of hours into them.

People need to sit back, relax and bitch less as arguably an MMO is probably one of the worst genres to cover in a Quick Look let alone a review given the constantly persistent nature that stems from games in this genre.

Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

98585

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#5  Edited By Hamz

@Hailinel said:

@Hamz

@Marino said:

@Hamz: Honestly, I don't think they even warrant object pages. Technically, yes, they would be classified as objects, but are we going to have an object page for every body part, bone, organ, etc.? Seems useless and ripe for users to attach every possible humanoid character to everything.

I'm tired, what I meant to say was....I see validation in them being concepts but not objects. Sleepy Hamz is sleepy!

They're body parts. What sort of justification could there be for concept pages?

I was leaning toward the Phallic/Yoni Imagery suggestion highlighted in your original post.

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

98585

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#6  Edited By Hamz

@Marino said:

@Hamz: Honestly, I don't think they even warrant object pages. Technically, yes, they would be classified as objects, but are we going to have an object page for every body part, bone, organ, etc.? Seems useless and ripe for users to attach every possible humanoid character to everything.

I'm tired, what I meant to say was....I see validation in them being concepts but not objects. Sleepy Hamz is sleepy!

Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

98585

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#7  Edited By Hamz

@Marino said:

@Hailinel: I'm all for deleting them. "Them" being the penis, vagina, and breasts pages. We have a nudity concept page that can cater to the first two (if not all 3), and a breast bounce concept page that is a valid concept.

I'm open to hearing an argument against this if there is one.

Agreed, definitely objects but not seeing much reason to retain the pages as concepts.

Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

98585

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#8  Edited By Hamz

Developers struggle to get games running smoothly at 720p let alone imagining them running smoothly at 1080p or higher.

Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

98585

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By Hamz

Smells like flamebait to me. Locking this down.

Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

98585

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#10  Edited By Hamz

I found it to be a good action film but a bad Batman movie, but if I had to pick my favourite scene it would have to be the moment John Blake's real name is revealed at which point all the subtle hints and nods that Nolan gave throughout the film all fit into place.

I really wished they would have changed the Batsuit in this film as well.