Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

306 Comments

Online Access To EA Sports Games To Be Granted Via One-Time Code

Used sales get even less attractive as EA locks away the main thing most sports fans probably want.

 Codes, codes, codes!
 Codes, codes, codes!
After locking online franchise mode away behind a one-use serial number in last year's Madden, EA has decided to go even further for all of this year's major sports releases, locking all online play and some additional features away from players who don't acquire an "Online Pass." The pass will, of course, be included with new copies of the game, but aside from the ability to sign up for a seven-day trial, players with used or rented copies will have to cough up an additional 10 bucks to get full access.

The Online Pass will lock away different types of content, depending on the game, but online play definitely seems to be the one unifying limitation. Madden NFL 11 players won't get any online play without it, as well as some unspecified "bonus content." Tiger Woods PGA Tour 11 will be the first game to roll out with the new Online Pass system, and in additional to traditional online play, players without a pass will be locked out of tournaments and EA Sports GamerNet. Tiger players who enter their code will also receive an "advanced driver" for in-game use. FIFA, NHL, NBA Live, NCAA Football, and EA Sports MMA are also scheduled to utilize the Online Pass setup.

Now, it's not really a huge surprise to see EA move forward with this sort of program. This is similar to the codes used in last year's Madden, as well as Mass Effect 2, Dragon Age: Origins, The Saboteur, and non-EA games like Gears of War 2. Online outcry to the procedure seems to be relatively minimal, but maybe there's some angry pocket of used game lovers that I'm not aware of.

In a posted question and answer sidebar on EA's page devoted to Online Pass, Andrew Wilson, the SVP of World Wide Development for EA Sports, has this to say with regards to the system's impact on used sales.

We actually view the second sale market as an opportunity to develop a direct relationship with our consumers, and with Online Pass everyone has access to the same premium online services and content regardless of how and where you buy the game. In order to continue to enhance the online experiences that are attracting nearly five million connected game sessions a day, again, we think it’s fair to get paid for the services we provide and to reserve these online services for people who pay EA to access them. In return, we’ll continue to invest in creating great games and offer industry-leading online services to extend the game experience to everyone.  I don’t think even the harshest cynic can argue with that and instead I think fans will see the value we’re committing to deliver when they see all the services, features and bonus content that is extending the life of their products.

At this point, I've gone back and forth on the idea of used sales so many times that I'm not sure where I even stand anymore. I tend to agree that game companies are probably right limit--or at least try to get some money directly from--used sales. But at the same time, moves like this limit consumer choice. I suppose this is, at least, a bit more flexible than the current PC market, which uses serial numbers and such to effectively halt used sales completely. This way, you can still grab a used game and, if you decide you actually care about online play, you have some sort of upgrade path beyond "go buy another copy, sucker."

Of course, if we continue down this path, I wouldn't be too shocked to see a future where every game comes with some sort of serial number that fully limits your ability to play a used copy of a game. Slippery slope and all. What do you think? Have these codes been getting on your nerves, or is it no big deal?
Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

306 Comments

Avatar image for thrax8
thrax8

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By thrax8

I only buy my sports games new. To buy them used would not make sense because by the time there is a good priced for a used copy the title has already lost most of its online following.

Avatar image for tadthuggish
TadThuggish

1073

Forum Posts

334

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 41

Edited By TadThuggish
@damnboyadvance:   Not making money =/= losing money.
Avatar image for archaen
Archaen

150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Edited By Archaen
@Cube said:

" I play NHL online. Someone just lost a sale. Way to lose a fan who's been buying the franchise since 99, EA.  Good job. "

If you've been buying their game used since '99 they don't care about you because you've never paid them a cent.
Avatar image for yakov456
yakov456

2021

Forum Posts

133

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By yakov456

Most people who really want to play these games online probably buy these games new near release day. So who gives a shit? If you want to still buy and play a game that is over a year old you still can, you just can't access the online community for free which in all honestly would be pretty dead by then anyway.

Avatar image for bruce
Bruce

6238

Forum Posts

145

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

Edited By Bruce
@Microshock said:
" FUCK THIS. Seriously. Fuck this. I don't give a shit about sport games. . . "  
 
Then this doesn't affect you, so enough with the raving / ranting exposition.
Avatar image for mast
MAST

891

Forum Posts

666

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By MAST

I'm completely opposed to this type of thing. I rarely buy games brand new. 60 dollars for a 10 hour game? No thanks. The only time I ever buy a game new, for 60 bucks, is when I know it's going to be good, and I know I'm going to spend 100+ hours on it (Modern Warfare 2, Street Fighter 4, Fallout 3, etc.) Companies like EA can continue to try and do away with used game sales, but all that will do is make it to where I just don't buy their game, period.  At the very least, when I buy their game used I usually end up buying DLC. So their getting some money out of me. If they end up doing away with used games sales, they won't be getting anything from me.
 
Consumers should have the right to do whatever they want with their property. If someone buys a game, and then decides to sale it in a yard sale. It's their right. It's also my right to buy games where I see fit, and try and get the best deal possible. Used game sales has practically been around since the inception of console video gaming, and the video game market has done nothing but grow since then. Used game sales hasn't stifled it at all. Trying to get rid of it now just reeks of greediness. Which duh, they are companies. Of course they want to squeeze every cent out of their product. I just hope nobody is fooled into thinking that used game sales is going to somehow destroy the video game business.

Avatar image for cl60
CL60

17117

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By CL60
@Toxin066 said:
" Codes are a pain in the ass to enter on ps3/360. Yeah. That's my thought on the issue. "
Not for me. I have a keypad.
Avatar image for bauxite
Bauxite

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Bauxite
@nobull6 said:
" The way I think of it is: 
Right Way: Developer gives you 100% of the game. You can experience all the features, etc. They include a one-time code to give you bonus content that enhances your experience.

Wrong Way: Developer gives you 90% of the game. You have to use the code that comes with a new copy to release the remaining 10%.  
 This seems like the "wrong way" to go about this. Online mode disabled if you buy used? But then again,this seems like it only has the potential to damage used game sales, and does that matter to the developer/publisher? I won't pick up the used copy if I know it's gimped, but that has zero impact on the publisher. I guess I can see why they would go ahead with something like this. "

How about thinking of online mode as your bonus DLC then? It's really the same situation, the wording is just different.
Avatar image for mast
MAST

891

Forum Posts

666

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By MAST
@ArthurAlmonte said:
" I only buy my sports games new. To buy them used would not make sense because by the time there is a good priced for a used copy the title has already lost most of its online following. "
Which is funny because, that's exactly why I buy these types of games used. I'm not going to pay 60 bucks for a game that will be dead 6 months after it's release. Or, at the most, it will last a year until the new game comes out, and everybody migrates to it. That is the very reason I hate these yearly sports games, and now I have reason to hate them even more.
Avatar image for kornkaos
Kornkaos

61

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

Edited By Kornkaos

EA is a greedy, and are going to cause problems for people like me who only can afford 4-5 games a month because I trade in used games. I hope this doesn't catch on or gaming might be a thing of the past for me -_-

Avatar image for carlthenimrod
carlthenimrod

1638

Forum Posts

22

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

Edited By carlthenimrod

That really stinks because sometimes I share the game between my brother. Sucks more for him because normally he borrows it from me. 
 
I know a lot of people are saying they don't care because they don't play sports games. But if you think EA will stop at sport games you will be in for a rude awakening soon enough.

Avatar image for pepper_2000
pepper_2000

304

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By pepper_2000

This is smart of them.

Avatar image for meatsim
MeatSim

11201

Forum Posts

150

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 23

Edited By MeatSim

Entering codes just more hassles.

Avatar image for sonicfire
SonicFire

875

Forum Posts

376

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By SonicFire

It doesn't really matter to me either way. While I like the concept of a resale market, I can understand the desire for companies to promote new game sales. But a resale market is not guaranteed even now, for example, it's not like I can sell back XBL or Steam purchases.
 
And really, let's face it, gamestop has stripped the value out of most used games (charging only 3-5$ less than the new game), so it's not like it will make a big difference.  The thing to ALWAYS watch for are the myriad deals that show up on new games, even shortly after release.  

Avatar image for bgrngod
Bgrngod

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Bgrngod

I never play these crap games to begin with so this is only a good thing in my eyes.  Less sports titles in the used section to wade through because the resell shops surely won't be buying back nearly as many.
 
Now if they start doing this for ALL of their games.. that's a different story.  I'm already pretty bitter about Mass Effect 2's shenanigans even though I bought it new.  If they are going to punish the used buyers they should reward the new game buyers just as much.  Make ALL DLC free to the original purchasers.

Avatar image for vibratingdonkey
vibratingdonkey

1238

Forum Posts

1219

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

Edited By vibratingdonkey

It is a bit of a conundrum isn't it? A predicament even. The justification makes sense, you can't really argue with it. But obviously I can't be in favor of a practice that seeks to impede what I feel should be my right as a consumer.
 
For now I guess this wouldn't really affect me personally as I haven't bought a game used in like three years, but eventually it might. Rely a lot on Gamestop trade-in deals.

Avatar image for ashwyn
Ashwyn

213

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

Edited By Ashwyn

" @Cube said:

" I play NHL online. Someone just lost a sale. Way to lose a fan who's been buying the franchise since 99, EA.  Good job. "

If you've been buying their game used since '99 they don't care about you because you've never paid them a cent. "
I chuckled :D
Avatar image for sticky_pennies
Sticky_Pennies

2092

Forum Posts

308

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By Sticky_Pennies

Aaand console games begin to take yet another step towards becoming PC games.

Avatar image for joeltgm
JoelTGM

5784

Forum Posts

1760

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By JoelTGM

I don't have a problem with it, but I worry about all the people who don't know about the code, and will buy it used from Gamestop or on Ebay because the seller leaves out that small detail that you can't play online with a used copy.

Avatar image for milkman
Milkman

19372

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By Milkman

Ouch, this is definitely a touchy subject. First off, I don't see this as EA being "greedy" or anything like that. EA wants to get paid for their products and they have every right to that. All the people who are calling EA greedy are probably the same people who think the music industry is greedy because they want you to pay for your songs.
 
On the other hand, I believe it's a consumer's right to choose. And as someone who is an avid GameFly user, this is a little unsettling. I'm well past the stage of buying new installments of sports games so I use GameFly for sports games all the time. So, this is definitely a bummer for me. It's a tough situation and while it sucks for people like me, I'm not going to throw a tantrum about it like some other people in these comments seem intend on doing.

Avatar image for jjor64
JJOR64

19700

Forum Posts

417

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

Edited By JJOR64

Thank god I don't buy EA games very often.

Avatar image for microshock
microshock

355

Forum Posts

259

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By microshock
@Bruce said:
" @Microshock said:
" FUCK THIS. Seriously. Fuck this. I don't give a shit about sport games. . . "  
 Then this doesn't affect you, so enough with the raving / ranting exposition. "
Uh it will affect me if they spread it out to other games. Typical asshole telling others they shouldn't rage against something just because it doesn't personally affect them.
Avatar image for agentxricky
agentxricky

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By agentxricky
@MAST said:
" I'm completely opposed to this type of thing. I rarely buy games brand new. 60 dollars for a 10 hour game? No thanks. The only time I ever buy a game new, for 60 bucks, is when I know it's going to be good, and I know I'm going to spend 100+ hours on it (Modern Warfare 2, Street Fighter 4, Fallout 3, etc.) Companies like EA can continue to try and do away with used game sales, but all that will do is make it to where I just don't buy their game, period.  At the very least, when I buy their game used I usually end up buying DLC. So their getting some money out of me. If they end up doing away with used games sales, they won't be getting anything from me.  Consumers should have the right to do whatever they want with their property. If someone buys a game, and then decides to sale it in a yard sale. It's their right. It's also my right to buy games where I see fit, and try and get the best deal possible. Used game sales has practically been around since the inception of console video gaming, and the video game market has done nothing but grow since then. Used game sales hasn't stifled it at all. Trying to get rid of it now just reeks of greediness. Which duh, they are companies. Of course they want to squeeze every cent out of their product. I just hope nobody is fooled into thinking that used game sales is going to somehow destroy the video game business. "

Your opinion is so bad. I actually hurt from reading it. Trying to get rid of a segment of the market that costs you millions of dollars per year is greediness? Used games wouldn't be such a problem if the real greedy corporation, Gamestop, didn't make a business by being so aggresively sleazy with used game sales. The fact that people don't see that EA is fighting to make money off of their OWN product is freaking idiocy. What you do doesn't matter to them anyways. You don't buy their games new, so you don't really exist. Which is good, because your opinion sucks.
Avatar image for damnboyadvance
damnboyadvance

4216

Forum Posts

1020

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 4

Edited By damnboyadvance
@TadThuggish said:
" @damnboyadvance:   Not making money =/= losing money. "
Yes.
Avatar image for damnboyadvance
damnboyadvance

4216

Forum Posts

1020

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 4

Edited By damnboyadvance
@TadThuggish: Actually, it is. They are still spending money to hold up the servers and stuff. If they aren't making any money to support it, they are losing money on it.
Avatar image for deactivated-6418ef3727cdd
deactivated-6418ef3727cdd

2721

Forum Posts

697

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Steam sales got yo back.

Avatar image for brownpants
brownpants

18

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By brownpants

Just pushing more people to pirate.

Avatar image for pksebben
PKSebben

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By PKSebben

Those of you that support the 10$ dollar program -- why would you so willingly let media companies basically torpedo your first sale rights? It's like leaving out the final chapter from a novel.   Courts have routinely denied companies the ability to impose post-sale restrictions on consumers in books and software, so why should they be able to do it here?        

Avatar image for skytylz
Skytylz

4156

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Skytylz

FUCK This!

Avatar image for godzilla_sushi
godzilla_sushi

1353

Forum Posts

402

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 19

Edited By godzilla_sushi

Pretty gosh darn smart on their part.
 
I hardly ever buy used games anymore for many reasons. I like to buy something the publisher and developer might have a shot at knowing about. Five bucks usually beats a torn up case with yellow stickers on it. Consider the record posted!
 
I don't have a problem with locking out multiplayer, so long as somebody lets the buyer know. Be it Gamestop on a label or EA on the back of the game saying it requires the serial number. A 55 dollar game suddenly becoming 70 after taxes, we're back to the N64 days now! ;)

Avatar image for hadestimes
HadesTimes

969

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 8

Edited By HadesTimes

Not that I don't understand why they are probably doing this, but the whole thing seems a little crappy to me.

Avatar image for haroldonvu
HaroldoNVU

623

Forum Posts

280

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 17

Edited By HaroldoNVU

I understand them, but that means that I'm no longer renting any of their sport titles. I like Fifa, but I'm not buying a 50-60 dollar game that will be obsolete in months. If they sold updates as DLC every six months (as team rosters change) for say, 20 bucks, then I'd be game. I mean, they could still sell their annual sequels but still support the older versions for a couple of years.

Avatar image for ch3burashka
ch3burashka

6086

Forum Posts

100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By ch3burashka

Incredibly restrictive DRM PoS? Sign me up!!!

Avatar image for branthog
Branthog

5777

Forum Posts

1014

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Branthog

Tired of this bullshit. If I buy a game, I should be able to use it fully as should anyone in my house. My roommates should not each have to pay another $10 to play it themselves (and sharing XBOX Live accounts is bullshit). I can roll out a board game on my table at home without each of the other players having to buy another copy or chip in a few bucks for the right to play the full game. I'm not duplicating the disc. There isn't more than one person playing one copy of the one game at any one moment in time. There is no reason for this other than a bullshit cash grab. This kind of shit really turns me off of games and makes me dread Mass Effect 3 and other worthy tiles that are getting caught up in the DLC-cash-grab-fuck-retailers-in-the-ass politics.

Avatar image for ekasra
Ekasra

145

Forum Posts

5306

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Ekasra

  Sucks for those who buys sports games used. All two of them. Honestly, there's a market of people really into sports games out there. And that's fine. But those people are generally day one purchases anyway. Go into Gamestop or any retailer selling you used games and the majority of ones on the shelf are sports games because nobody buys them. In fact, I'm sure they fill they're quota on sport games they can take in a couple months after the game is released and still has an ample supply for the next decade.

Avatar image for darlan
Darlan

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Darlan

Digital distribution will probably get rid of used sales altogether in a few years anyways. In the meantime, why not help the Gamestop crowd get used to interacting with their console's online functions and make stop used game stores from making all of the money off of  products they didn't make? Seems fair to me.

Avatar image for royce_mccutcheon
Royce_McCutcheon

264

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Royce_McCutcheon

 Yeah well, my Dragon Age online DLC code never worked, even after signing up and logging in to the seventeen accounts they wanted me to, so......

Avatar image for funexplosions
FunExplosions

5534

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By FunExplosions

Everyone seems to only care about the fact that they don't play sports games. I don't play many sports games, and I think this is fucking horrible news. Just like Jeff said:

 Of course, if we continue down this path, I wouldn't be too shocked to see a future where every game comes with some sort of serial number that fully limits your ability to play a used copy of a game. Slippery slope and all. 



Indeed. EA needs to collapse, already. These money-hungry whores don't care how far they drag down the industry, as long as they're making a good couple bucks, saving their asses, in the mean time. Somewhere at the top of their PR and advertising firms is a man that really hates video games.

Avatar image for claude
Claude

16672

Forum Posts

1047

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 18

Edited By Claude
Avatar image for danishmaggot
Danishmaggot

109

Forum Posts

135

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Danishmaggot

So now GameFly will be obsolete?? Wow.... 

Avatar image for louiedog
louiedog

2391

Forum Posts

227

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By louiedog

I'm okay with packaging codes for content to curb the sale of used games. I'm not okay with EA games requiring EA servers between the user and Xbox Live. When that happens you run into situations like with LOTR: Conquest where after a year, they shut down the servers and you can no longer play online.

Avatar image for olivaw
Olivaw

1309

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Olivaw

EA's policy is pretty bullshit in comparison to BioWare's.
 
See, because Mass Effect 2 allows players who purchased used to play the entire game, but if they wanted any of the awesome free bonus content, they'd have to pony up ten bucks for a Cerberus Network card. Dragon Age: Origins mostly had paid DLC and not free stuff, if I recall correctly. Maybe achievements would be locked if you didn't buy new, but who cares about them?
 
EA's policy is actively restricting all online content and it sounds like some actual content that is on the disc will also be locked.
 
Of course none of this really matters to me because I don't purchase used games much but still. Let's be clear about the levels of bullshit present here.

Avatar image for the8bitnacho
the8bitNacho

2304

Forum Posts

6388

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 2

Edited By the8bitNacho

Awesome business decision.  Fuck used game sales.

Avatar image for themasterds
TheMasterDS

3018

Forum Posts

7716

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 31

Edited By TheMasterDS

    People who buy used games are not customers of the publishers, and as such do not deserve any content frankly. After all, why should EA provide the game if none of the money from the sale goes to EA? 
 
As someone who buys games new, I appreciate an attempt to fuck over people who buy used. Honestly, it's tantamount to piracy. Doesn't matter that money changes hands, they're still the wrong hands.

Avatar image for wolf_blitzer85
wolf_blitzer85

5460

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By wolf_blitzer85

I guess from a business standpoint it makes sense. From a consumer standpoint it feels like EA taking advantage of what is pretty much considered a mainstay (online gaming) and making a quick buck off of it. But hey, it's their game, they can charge for whatever component they want for it. Don't like it? Don't buy it.  

Avatar image for mast
MAST

891

Forum Posts

666

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By MAST
@agentxricky said:
"Used games wouldn't be such a problem if the real greedy corporation, Gamestop, didn't make a business by being so aggresively sleazy with used game sales. The fact that people don't see that EA is fighting to make money off of their OWN product is freaking idiocy"
Well then they need to go after the company, not the consumer. They should be punishing Gamestop, not the consumers. I should be able to buy games used. It's my right as a consumer, and I shouldn't be punished for it by them taking features out of the game in order to try and combat what Gamestop is doing. Selling things used has been around forever, and it hasn't stopped markets from thriving. People sell used cars, used music, used games, used clothes, used everything. It's been happening for centuries. As I said, selling games used has been around since the beginning of the video game industry, and yet, the industry has done nothing but grow in leaps and bounds for the past 20-30 years. 
That just goes to show that the used game market isn't causing the game business any harm. You don't have to agree with my opinion. You can call it stupid, or say that it sucks. That's fine. You know why? Because it's not opinion, it's fact. The proof is in the pudding, as the saying goes. All you have to do is look at the past few decades of video games, and you can see the used game market has existing alongside new game sales for that entire time, and everything has been fine.

I'm right, you are wrong. Deal with it. =)
Avatar image for zaapp1
Zaapp1

716

Forum Posts

556

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By Zaapp1

Yet another step towards the all-digital future, which I'm totally psyched for by the way.  Discs have served their purpose...

Avatar image for bhhawks78
bhhawks78

1348

Forum Posts

18

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By bhhawks78

Well not buying any more ea sports game, oh wait i forgot nba live sucks, nfl 2k5 is still better than madden 2010 and i don't care about other sports.

Avatar image for cuzintheboss
cuzintheboss

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By cuzintheboss

does this mean i can play EA games online with xbl silver account?