Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Final Fantasy XIII

    Game » consists of 17 releases. Released Mar 09, 2010

    This entry into the Final Fantasy universe is set in the worlds of Pulse and Cocoon. Players take control of multiple characters who are caught in a war between these worlds.

    The Review For Final Fantasy XIII

    • 78 results
    • 1
    • 2
    Avatar image for shinjiex
    ShinjiEx

    793

    Forum Posts

    7

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 16

    User Lists: 0

    #1  Edited By ShinjiEx
    Avatar image for jimbo
    Jimbo

    10472

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #2  Edited By Jimbo
    @ShinjiEx said:
    " "The game gets good at 25 hours"  "
    Perfect pacing.
    Avatar image for pufferfiz
    PufferFiz

    1501

    Forum Posts

    3667

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 6

    #3  Edited By PufferFiz

    Like Ryan said, You can't make a game that is 90% shit and the last 10% is good. I don't care if the back half is good. If I can't get into it when I play the first half then I am just going to turn it off.

    Avatar image for addfwyn
    Addfwyn

    2057

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 11

    #4  Edited By Addfwyn
    @PufferFiz:  
    That's the thing, the entire 'first 90% is shit' is just pure hyperbole.  Yes, the game starts slow, but that doesn't mean the entire first part of the game is bad.  It's just slow.  Slow != bad.  The second half of the game is certainly better, but the first half isn't bad. 
    Avatar image for efwefwe
    wefwefasdf

    6730

    Forum Posts

    694

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: -1

    User Lists: 1

    #5  Edited By wefwefasdf
    @Jimbo said:
    " @ShinjiEx said:
    " "The game gets good at 25 hours"  "
    Perfect pacing. "
    I laughed. :p
    Avatar image for yukoei
    Yukoei

    2141

    Forum Posts

    143

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #6  Edited By Yukoei
    Avatar image for efwefwe
    wefwefasdf

    6730

    Forum Posts

    694

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: -1

    User Lists: 1

    #7  Edited By wefwefasdf
    Avatar image for addfwyn
    Addfwyn

    2057

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 11

    #8  Edited By Addfwyn

    Also, I should point out that review had some bad premises.  It started saying basically that FFXIII needed to be more like a WRPG, because JRPGs were dying.  That is the worst thing a game can do, try to be something it isn't.  A FF game that just tried to be Mass Effect would be atrocious.  I just think that's a bad mistake too many reviewers are making
     
    That said, the review really picked up after that point, with fairly solid criticisms AND praise where both were due for the game, and a fairly solid conclusion as well.

    Avatar image for lambert
    Lambert

    405

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #9  Edited By Lambert

    I hate the fact that I followed one review that said 15 hours into the game it gets good. I'm 20 hours in, and I only see glimpses of a good game.
     
    This shit shouldn't be put up with in gaming and it shouldn't be ignored. 
     
    And of course the apologists will defend it to death. I'm sorry, but I don't like games with horrible game design.

    Avatar image for jeust
    Jeust

    11739

    Forum Posts

    15085

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 15

    #10  Edited By Jeust
    @SpikeSpiegel said:
    " @Jimbo said:
    " @ShinjiEx said:
    " "The game gets good at 25 hours"  "
    Perfect pacing. "
    I laughed. :p "
    Me too... 
    Avatar image for the8bitnacho
    the8bitNacho

    2304

    Forum Posts

    6388

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 28

    User Lists: 2

    #11  Edited By the8bitNacho

    Then why did it "get good" at the three hour mark for me when the battle system opened up?  Really, this game is going to be extremely subjective to the person playing it.

    Avatar image for ashwyn
    Ashwyn

    213

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 1

    #12  Edited By Ashwyn

    Myabe im alone on this but i found that 'Review' to be more like an 'Overview' of the game, rather than explain the ups and downs he just says the games trying to innovative and it gets good at 25 hours...

    Avatar image for hitchenson
    Hitchenson

    4708

    Forum Posts

    121

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #13  Edited By Hitchenson
    Avatar image for dogbox
    dogbox

    623

    Forum Posts

    1101

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 2

    #14  Edited By dogbox
    @Lambert: It can't  be THAT bad if you've played it for 20 hours in like 3 days.
    Avatar image for yukoei
    Yukoei

    2141

    Forum Posts

    143

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #15  Edited By Yukoei
    Avatar image for addfwyn
    Addfwyn

    2057

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 11

    #16  Edited By Addfwyn
    @Lambert: Then you are playing the wrong genre, and it's probably just not for you.  Though it's odd that you have an avatar from the one series MORE cinematic and hands-off than Final Fantasy.  The first 20 hours isn't bad, it's slow, but not bad.  If you don't like the slow-pacing, that's okay...but it's probably a qualm you have with the genre more than anything else.  Much how I don't like WRPGs, I think perhaps JRPGs just aren't your thing?  
     
    I think it's a quality of the expanding FF playerbase, players who haven't really played a FF or JRPG game are jumping into this and expecting a totally different genre than what they are getting.  It's unfortunate really, for the player's sakes.
    Avatar image for natetodamax
    natetodamax

    19464

    Forum Posts

    65390

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 32

    User Lists: 5

    #17  Edited By natetodamax
    @PufferFiz said:
    " Like Ryan said, You can't make a game that is 90% shit and the last 10% is good. I don't care if the back half is good. If I can't get into it when I play the first half then I am just going to turn it off. "
    Don't take everything Ryan says seriously.
    Avatar image for yukoei
    Yukoei

    2141

    Forum Posts

    143

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #18  Edited By Yukoei
    Avatar image for infinitegeass
    InfiniteGeass

    2150

    Forum Posts

    446

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #19  Edited By InfiniteGeass

    I don't care what reviewers say. I still like the game.

    Avatar image for addfwyn
    Addfwyn

    2057

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 11

    #20  Edited By Addfwyn
    @Yukoei:  
    Very true, I've said it countless times now, but people are confusing 'slow start' with 'bad start'.  The first hours of the game are slow, but still really good.  Look at other highly cinematic games like Persona 4 (okay, it's dialogue cutscenes not CG, but the same idea) some Metal Gears, or even some past FFs.  They start slow, that doesn't mean they start badly.  I loved the first 4 hours of P4, even though you don't get to do so much as move during them.  Even once you move, it's another few hours before you even get to any combat.  
    Avatar image for rjayb89
    rjayb89

    7813

    Forum Posts

    9437

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 17

    #21  Edited By rjayb89  Online

    If the game was racist, I'd purchase it right away.

    Avatar image for jeust
    Jeust

    11739

    Forum Posts

    15085

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 15

    #22  Edited By Jeust
    @Addfwyn said:
    " Also, I should point out that review had some bad premises.  It started saying basically that FFXIII needed to be more like a WRPG, because JRPGs were dying.  That is the worst thing a game can do, try to be something it isn't.  A FF game that just tried to be Mass Effect would be atrocious.  I just think that's a bad mistake too many reviewers are making That said, the review really picked up after that point, with fairly solid criticisms AND praise where both were due for the game, and a fairly solid conclusion as well. "
    He praised Mass Effect 2, but looking back at the game, no game was like it before. I think that what he was praising was how good Mass Effect 2 was.  
     
    What is jrpg? And wrpg? They are both belonging to the rpg genre.  
      
    And what he said was not how FF should be more like a wrpg, but that the focus of gaming has changed from jrpg to wrpg, and called jrpg "aged". Was that wrong?
    Avatar image for mnine
    mnine

    22

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #23  Edited By mnine

    I have yet to play it, but so far to me it sounds like even the "negatives" are things I will like. 
     
    That said, I still think VIII is on top.

    Avatar image for addfwyn
    Addfwyn

    2057

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 11

    #24  Edited By Addfwyn
    @Jeust:  
    At one point in time you could say they were both RPGs, but the way they have migrated from each other, WRPG and JRPG are two totally different genres that really shouldn't be compared anymore.  They have two entirely different foci and very few similarities (outside of often having level-up and powering up mechanics).  That's why I almost never say just RPG anymore (If I do, I'm probably talking about JRPGs and forgot the J).   There are totally different characteristics that really set them apart.
     
    I'd say that the focus of gaming hasn't necessarily changed from JRPG to WRPG, nor that JRPGs are aged.  The focus has certainly changed towards WRPG in the WEST, but well...that's a given of the name of the genre even.  I also  think that just cause there has been a vast amount of WRPGs this generation and very very few JRPGs, so that the obvious focus has just been on WRPGs.  Outside of a couple action-rpg hybrids, this and WKC are really the first JRPGs we've had in years on a non-portable system.  So an under-represented genre is just going to seem less popular overall. 
     
    @mnine: You seem like a man with similar tastes, I approve :P
    Avatar image for zenaxpure
    ZenaxPure

    2584

    Forum Posts

    2577

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    #25  Edited By ZenaxPure
    @rjayb89 said:
    " If the game was racist, I'd purchase it right away. "
    Theres only like 2 black people in the entire world (that I've seen anyway), I'd say that's pretty racist.
    Avatar image for kaosangel-DELETED
    KaosAngel

    14251

    Forum Posts

    6507

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 3

    #26  Edited By KaosAngel
    @Zenaxzd: There's barely any black people in Japan (outside from those Nigerians trying to sell me hookers), does that mean Japan is racist?  It's just the setting...if the game took place in the desert, I'd bet you see more darker complexion than the paler ones.
    Avatar image for zenaxpure
    ZenaxPure

    2584

    Forum Posts

    2577

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    #27  Edited By ZenaxPure
    @KaosAngel: I was making a joke, of course I am not really surprised you didn't see any sort of sarcasm there so haha....ha...
    Avatar image for kaosangel-DELETED
    KaosAngel

    14251

    Forum Posts

    6507

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 3

    #28  Edited By KaosAngel
    @Zenaxzd: I was being sarcastic too...that's why I put the line about hookers in there.  :P  
     
    But seriously, they do it a lot in Roppongi...it's annoying when it's 3 a.m. and all you want to do is pray the morning train isn't delayed with a morning suicide jumper.  >.>
    Avatar image for zenaxpure
    ZenaxPure

    2584

    Forum Posts

    2577

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    #29  Edited By ZenaxPure
    @KaosAngel said:
    " @Zenaxzd: I was being sarcastic too "
    It's hard to tell with you sadly.
    Avatar image for kaosangel-DELETED
    KaosAngel

    14251

    Forum Posts

    6507

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 3

    #30  Edited By KaosAngel
    @Zenaxzd: Off the record, is that was the majority of people here think too?  >.>
    Avatar image for zenaxpure
    ZenaxPure

    2584

    Forum Posts

    2577

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    #31  Edited By ZenaxPure
    @KaosAngel: No idea, not those people. But there's something there trust me.
    Avatar image for sneakypenguins
    SneakyPenguins

    293

    Forum Posts

    23

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 3

    #32  Edited By SneakyPenguins

    i liked the first half its slow but sets up characters nicely and most importantly taught me how to play as i dont play rpg's hardly ever

    Avatar image for shinjiex
    ShinjiEx

    793

    Forum Posts

    7

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 16

    User Lists: 0

    #33  Edited By ShinjiEx

     I don't get the complaints there is no 1 true style when it comes to a Final Fantasy game
    Ever installment changes the setup an rules of how the game plays
    For example
    FF9 The last "True" Old School Setup much like the first 6 chapter of the series
    FF10 Liner Character Driven Story
    FF11 MMO Online only game pay to play per month
    FF12 Offline version of a MMO dungeon crawler basic bland story rarely any cut scenes or character development
    F13 returns back to Liner Character Driven Story setup but is more of a action adventure
    ^_^

    Avatar image for milkman
    Milkman

    19372

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #34  Edited By Milkman
    @Kombat said:
    " Then why did it "get good" at the three hour mark for me when the battle system opened up?  Really, this game is going to be extremely subjective to the person playing it. "
    You mean like every other game ever made? Of course, it's subjective.
    Avatar image for toxin066
    Toxin066

    3589

    Forum Posts

    118

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #35  Edited By Toxin066

    When did JRPG become it's own genre? I thought there were just "RPGs", which even then is a very loose term. Why can't FF13 be judged against games like Oblivion and the Mass Effect series?

    Avatar image for mildmolasses
    MildMolasses

    3200

    Forum Posts

    386

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 9

    User Lists: 16

    #36  Edited By MildMolasses
    @natetodamax said:
    " @PufferFiz said:
    " Like Ryan said, You can't make a game that is 90% shit and the last 10% is good. I don't care if the back half is good. If I can't get into it when I play the first half then I am just going to turn it off. "
    Don't take everything Ryan says seriously. "

    So you would like a game that was awful for the first 25 hours, but great for the last 3? He wasn't saying that in reference to this game, it was a generalization about games. A game isn't good if you have to force yourself through hours or boredom in order to get to the fun parts, and that was the point he was making
    Avatar image for addfwyn
    Addfwyn

    2057

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 11

    #37  Edited By Addfwyn
    @Toxin066:  
    Because they are two totally different genres of games under a very broad category of 'RPG'.  Much like FPS and Third Person Shooters are both 'shooters' but very different styles of games.    A WRPG is more focused on open worlds, player choices, and customization.  A JRPG is more focused on story, narrative, and characters, being more of a cinematic method of storytelling.  They both of their ups and downs and neither is inherently better than the other (Though personally I don't like WRPGs, as many won't like JRPGs).   
     
    Trying to cross-compare between WRPG and JRPG is very difficult to do because they frankly have so little in common except some basic gameplay mechanics like levelling up, and even that varies heavily from game to game.
    Avatar image for toxin066
    Toxin066

    3589

    Forum Posts

    118

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #38  Edited By Toxin066
    @Addfwyn:  Fair point. And I like the FPS-TPS analogy. My problem though, is I hear a lot about how FF13 isn't a good "RPG", while others are saying "you just don't appreciate it because it's a JRPG." And it seems to be the same back and forth. And it's starting to irk me. I don't care if it's good for a JRPG. I care if it's a good game.
    Avatar image for addfwyn
    Addfwyn

    2057

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 11

    #39  Edited By Addfwyn
    @Toxin066: Well, that's the thing, it's a good game IF you like the genre.  It's probably not a good enough game to make you like it if you normally dislike JRPGs.  So it's not genre-transcendingly good,  it's just a solid entry for that genre.   So the statement 'you just don't like JRPGs' is accurate when people bring up a lot of complaints that are just characteristic of the JRPG genre.  It's an understandable problem, cause SO many RPGs lately have been WRPGs, people are expecting a different kind of game then what they are getting.  A lot of times, even a good game can be a disappointment if it wasn't what you specifically wanted when you bought it.
    Avatar image for efwefwe
    wefwefasdf

    6730

    Forum Posts

    694

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: -1

    User Lists: 1

    #40  Edited By wefwefasdf
    @KaosAngel said:
    " @Zenaxzd: Off the record, is that was the majority of people here think too?  >.> "
    Yeah, most people can't tell with you for some reason. It is blatantly obvious to me. haha
    Avatar image for ulong
    Ulong

    525

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #41  Edited By Ulong

    Adam gave the game a 4/5. Just posting adam's quote of "the game gets good at 25 hours" is completly taking his review and comment out of context and is delibratly misleading. I expected a 1/5 or 2/5 from the quote you posted on it's own.
     
    In context, I think he just ment the game get's better at 25, like, it's a good game and then get's much much better at 25, in adams opinion.
     
    Editing to add: I love the game, but 4/5 is a completly fair score and adam did a good job on this review. I don't have much love for xplay (I realized it was crap when they gave a 2/5 to manhunt but then a bit later reccomended manhunt as a great christmas present during their christmas special), but there is nothing wrong with this review.

    Avatar image for addfwyn
    Addfwyn

    2057

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 11

    #42  Edited By Addfwyn
    @Ulong:  
      
    "It's a good game that gets better at 25" is a very accurate statement.  I agree that it is probably one of the fairer reviews (both in good and bad) i've seen.  Though I don't think you should be surprised to see people on the internet taking things out of context to suit their ends :P
    Avatar image for puppet_master
    Puppet_Master

    2

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #43  Edited By Puppet_Master

    I think the pacing in this game is all wrong. Especially the beginning.
     
    I miss the downtime of towns. Not enough time to soak the atmosphere.
     
    The battle system becomes more strategic and fun once all the roles are available.
     
    The production values are great. I like the story, characters, graphics and audio. 
     
    The game play takes a while to kick in.
     
     I think SE have dropped the ball on this one. 

    Avatar image for sixpin
    sixpin

    1345

    Forum Posts

    758

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 7

    #44  Edited By sixpin

      Yeah, I'd have to say I'm pretty disappointed in the XIII overall. I like it okay, but just okay isn't really what I expect out of a Final Fantasy title. I played FF since the first one on NES, maybe that makes me bias. My favorites to this day are still FFVI and FFIX.    

    Avatar image for caseylakes
    caseylakes

    301

    Forum Posts

    80

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #45  Edited By caseylakes

    If it wasn't for the battle system and the story which is complimented by amazing cut scenes and characters (whom's back stories have a lot of detail) I wouldn't be playing it any more. The linear thing I will have gotten over as it isn't game breaking. 

    Avatar image for thehbk
    TheHBK

    5674

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 6

    #46  Edited By TheHBK
    @Addfwyn: I think he meant that is should be more open world, that it should feel like you are in a real place with history but that it gets you to learn about it.  Not some dialogue you dont understand only for you to be told to look it up.  And for the characters to not be retarded.  Like seriously, enough with the japanese conventions (blonde hair, retarded names), its not cute anymore.   and Dude, there is a difference between starting slow for a couple of hours and having the game get good 25 hours later.  You know how many good games people can play in that time?  I am counting a lot right now.
     
    But here is my review.  This game is dumb.  Endorsed by Giant Bomb's Jeff Gertsmann
    Avatar image for spazmaster666
    spazmaster666

    2114

    Forum Posts

    42

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 9

    User Lists: 16

    #47  Edited By spazmaster666

    I agree that the game definitely gets better after you're given full control of your squad but that's not to say that the first 20 to 25 hours of the game isn't good, just that it has some frustrating moments and some tedium involved. But what JRPG doesn't have that? At least I'm not constantly grinding like I would be doing in many other JRPGs (since the linearity of it makes grinding somewhat more difficult especially in the earlier portions). In any case, it hasn't really detracted me from the game since for me a big part of the fun is collecting all the items and upgrading them as much as possible.

    Avatar image for ataxia
    Ataxia

    153

    Forum Posts

    4

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #48  Edited By Ataxia
    @PufferFiz:
    25 hours out of 40 isn't 90%
    Avatar image for bobby_the_great
    Bobby_The_Great

    1140

    Forum Posts

    11

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #49  Edited By Bobby_The_Great

    Am I the only person that's 5 hours into the game and loves it?
    Avatar image for rirobuge
    Rirobuge

    167

    Forum Posts

    3616

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #50  Edited By Rirobuge
    @Bobby_The_Great said:
    " Am I the only person that's 5 hours into the game and loves it? "
    I feel the same way.
    If you don't like the way the game is, then don't play the game. It's starting to get quite obnoxious with the amount of bitching there has been about the linearity of the first section of the game. Either deal with the way the game is or quit wasting your time complaining about how this game doesn't cater specifically to how you want it to be. So what if most of the other games in the series have open worlds and towns, do you really want to be playing the same game masked with a different story that many times?

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.