StarCraft Vehicles

I don't really know anything about StarCraft (or RTS's for that matter), so I need some help with this.  For vehicles and other things that are getting added to the database as concepts, is that the correct classification?  Should they be concepts or objects?  I have someone arguing that since it's an RTS, they are units and therefore concepts, but I really don't understand this argument.  To me, I see a description telling me it's a vehicle or a warp gate and that says Object page to me. 
 
But again, I don't know shit about SC. 
 
Discuss. 
 
Warp Prism     
Void Ray  
Sentry 
Probe  
Phoenix  
Mothership  
Immortal  
Colossus  
Carrier

I don't get that argument at all. They physically exist (within the game) and thus they are objects. The term "unit" could be a concept, if anything.

They should be listed as Objects and not Concepts.
 
A brief extract from the Wiki FAQ;
 
 

Objects

 
Like franchises, in-game objects can be very broad or very specific, allowing for object pages as general as Sword and as defined as Master Sword. The relationship should always be meaningful; Grass is only important in a few different titles, so don't list every game that has ever featured grass. Objects include vehicles, weapons, and basically any piece of technology that lacks sentience.

Is "The Hyperion" an object or a location?

" Is "The Hyperion" an object or a location? "

Well, I'm not a huge Starcraft lore-ist, but I'm pretty certain that if a fallen Protoss warrior (i.e. Zealots, Dark Templars) is still alive and not completely destroyed after a battle, they (or their soul(?)) are placed within a vehicle. So that they actually are the unit, they are not "driving" a vehicle. 
 
Anyway, since I'm the dude who made these pages, I would gladly take on the deed of converting them all to object pages(if it has to be done manually) if I am mistaken.

The Probe is a robot as far as I know. Are robots concepts or objects?

• A robot is a non-sentient thing in video games just like a Sword is.

• Robots are a theme in many video games similar to the Undead.
  

So before I start with adding all the Terran units, I just wanted to ask some questions. The Siege Tank is an object page, but what about units like the marauders or reapers?

The Immortals are actually cyborgs, not vehicles, the dudes inside are permanently bonded to the structure, so they at least would count as concepts, but as far as I know, all the others are robots or vehicles, which I guess would make them objects.
 
EDIT: And someone totally pointed this out already, my bad.

" So before I start with adding all the Terran units, I just wanted to ask some questions. The Siege Tank is an object page, but what about units like the marauders or reapers? "

Marauders, Firebats, and Reapers are all terrans in different suits i'd say the name applys to the suit rather than the terran in it so I'd put them up as objects

Units like Templar/Marauders/Firebats/Reapers refer to the talents, attributes and gear of each living person inside them... so I think they should be concepts (you wouldn't classify the army, navy, or airforce as 'things' would you?). All zerg units too... because they're more like creatures (which are concepts). Vehicles refer to what the machine being piloted is... an is thus an object/thing.
On another note, what's the deal with editing things so they can be changed from 'concept' to 'object'? If it can't be done yet, I think someone should have access to have the ability to change the categorization.

"Do things count as objects even if there's multiple versions of them? "