If you had to decide between playing either EA or Activision published games exclusively for all eternity, which would you go for?

Activision, only for Blizzard though.

Ask this five years ago and the results would be the opposite.
Ask this five years from now and there's a good chance they'll be flipped around again.

Activision has Blizzard.

I'd pick EA. They have been putting out good games and with the EA Partners program you'd be able to play a bunch more games by different people.

EA, no question really. As much as I would like to play Diablo III, its just one game. EA however publishes a lot of good games that I like a lot. They are also publishing Insomniac's upcoming multiplatform game, so its really no question.

" Activision, only for Blizzard though. "

EA. EA Partners is great. Love DICE and the Battlefield franchise is my favorite. Bioware make my favorite singleplayer RPGs. If I play a sports game, it's an EA sports game. Fond memories of Fifa Soccer. And so forth. 
 
Pricey, because Blizzard is a close second to DICE, but hell, shooters just have the best moment to moment gameplay and Battlefield has biggest moments of all.

EA easily. Blizzard is long gone for me since I don't play on my PC, plus EA has got a more varied gaming outlet I think. Plus EA publishes BioWare's games..so..yeah.

Damn. I forgot about Bioware. :[

EA for greater variety and EAP / Bioware.

EA, if only because I can continue to play NCAA Football and Madden NFL.

EA. Two words: Mass Effect. Okay, two more: Dead Space. 

" Damn. I forgot about Bioware. :[ "

EA has a more diverse range of developers, plus the partners program, so I guess I'll go with them.

EA without a doubt. 
There's a little more variety in their games than says Blizzard have.  
Diablo 3 is gonna be a better looking Diablo, Starcraft 2 feels like Starcraft, only better looking-ish.  
And WoW is gonna be wow..  
 
So yeah, EA

That was tough.  I think I'll have to go with Blizz though. 

" Activision, only for Blizzard though. "

EA is making better decisions about what they publish as opposed to activision who only publishes something they can run into the ground.

EA publishes a lot more creative games than Activision do.

EA, easily, for all of their EA Partners stuff.  Blizz are great n all but they haven't actually released a new game for 6 years.

EA. I don't care about Starcraft, Warcraft, Call of Duty or rhythm games, and EA has Battlefield, Dead Space, Mirror's Edge, Burnout and Need for Speed.

EA because they make less crap at the moment

EA as it has a different variety of games.

I HATE EA because of what they did to me with Battlefield 2142 (my fault for buying a PC game though), but I don't play computer games so the obvious answer is EA.

EA has some really good stuff.  
 
Activision gives you Tony Hawk Ride and yearly Call of Duty games.  I know they have Blizzard, but I'm not into RTS games.

EA. I was about to buy the Call of Duty pack on Steam and than I remmbered I hate Activision so I didnt. 
So basically I would stick with EA (plus EA owns Bioware).

EA has DICE, Bioware, Visceral, Blackbox, Epic, Criterion, Respawn, and Valve.  Activision has Blizzard and Bungie....not a hard choice really. EA

While I do enjoy most of what Blizzard creates, they don't do it often enough to justify playing Activision games exclusively.    
 
@Kahoona:
I believe EA only publishes the physical copies of  whatever Valve creates, so I wouldn't really count them as a creative studio they own/partner with.  Just me though  

EA. They've definitely reshaped their image for the better. Of course, having Activision being a super huge douchebag also helps.

As much as I loved Blizzard, I'm skeptical about StarCraft II, and I'm sold on Mass Effect 3 and Dragon Age 2. I have to go with EA.

EA, because Activision is awful and I don't care about Blizzard games.

EA for Fifa

EA have the bigger and more varied collection of games, which means EA = more fun, so i pick EA

Bioware and deadspace are the only games either pub makes that I do more than gamefly and play for 2-3 hours.

EA all the way. Diablo and Starcraft are great, but if I couldn't play Battlefield or Bioware games, that would be awful. 

EA. So I can "Challenge Everything".

EA for diversity, Rockband and Bioware.

Continual Starcraft/Diablo games, with a few Activision games to keep me happy between releases, could last me the rest of my life. 
 
@SJSchmidt93 said:

" Activision, only for Blizzard though. 

EA. As much as I hate them, they put out a lot more games that are interesting to me than Activision.

That's a tough one. Activision does have some games that run very good stories (i.e Prototype and a couple of Call of Duties). Though I'm not going to bash on the company because of Bobby Kotick. I'll just bash on him. Although so far EA has been dishing out some good Battlefield games lately and they're still supporting their online PC games with updates. Other companies, once their games have been out there for almost a year, then there's no more support. The EA Partners program I'm a lil iffy on. They say it will help newer developers, but I get the feeling something will go wrong. Maybe I'm wrong. We'll see in the future.

I would read a book. 
 
Edit: that sounded weird.  What I really mean is if you were to limit my choice in videogame consumption to just one publisher, I'd probably just start focusing on another hobby. Wasn't a knock against either one.

EA all the way. I play more of their games in the first place. 

Bioware son.

I hate EA.
 
But EA has Rock Band :(

EA, because I'd probably just play Road Rash II for the rest of eternity.

EA.

ea published shaq fu, so i think it is obvious.