" @ajamafalous said:I thought of this as I wrote that line."" It's been said a bunch, but I just want to reinforce the sentiment that anything that segregates the community is a bad idea, whether it be a tag by their name (subscribers then seeing themselves as better than dirty non-subscribing peasants)"
@Kung_Fu_Viking said:
" @ajamafalous said:The problem with hiding stuff like Quick Looks behind a fee is that those features are ultimately meant to inform people about the games they're displaying, and you can go to tens of other large (free) video game websites for that. I think the minute they start putting that content behind a paygate is the mintue the silent majority quits visiting the site." It's been said a bunch, but I just want to reinforce the sentiment that anything that segregates the community is a bad idea, whether it be a tag by their name (subscribers then seeing themselves as better than dirty non-subscribing peasants), exclusive video or audio content (Quick Looks, Podcasts, Endurance Runs, whatever), or something similar. The only media I can think of that would be worthy of a subscription would be stuff like behind-the-scenes office videos and the like, but they already shoot and livestream a ton of those. Will they suddenly stop doing them as often to hold back some for paying customers? Will they then feel obligated to meet a quota for the subscribers, resulting in some videos feeling forced? Not sure why a ton of people are asking for the ability to download videos, you can do that now. Last year I filled up my hard drive downloading the first 50-some-odd episodes of the P4ER. Also, if animated avatars or forum signatures happen, I'll likely stop visiting the forums. "I wouldn't pay for the behind the scenes stuff. I'd be far more more inclined to pay for content relevant to videos games i.e. Quick Looks, AMAs, ERs (Or MMO things like The Matrix Online feature etc.) Basically HD video content is something I would pay for. News and other text based editorial features should contiue to be available for free as should the wiki side of things. If that would split the community then so be it. If this site's video content entertains and/or informs you then why wouldn't you be willing to pay for it? "
The problem with splitting the community is that, as others have said, this website is something like 80-20 in terms of user-created content to staff-created content. Splintering the community could lead to a bunch of people leaving what has been, especially around launch, a largely community-oriented website.
Log in to comment