No, and anybody who thinks so is a fucking idiot that needs to be destroyed.
Do you think there was, in any way, a conspiracy involving 9/11?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
" No, and anybody who thinks so is a fucking idiot that needs to be destroyed. "Who paid you to say that * twitches and puts on tin foil hat*
" No, and anybody who thinks so is a fucking idiot that needs to be destroyed. "I see, so you're saying that you would have anyone who would open another investigation killed?
HE'S ONE OF THEM!
" No, and anybody who thinks so is a fucking idiot that needs to be destroyed. "really now? theres more than enough bullshit to warrant another take. just like they did with the JFK assassination.
I don't necessarily think "THE GOVERNMENT DID IT!!!1!", but I think there's definitely more to the story that we'll probably never know about.
I don't know. But all I know was a lot of lives were lost in 9/11. Regardless of conspiracy, it was a tragic event.
A new investigation should be initiated. It probably won't happen now, but maybe a decade or two later. A investigation now could cause too much controversy. Even when a investigation concludes, it may be some years before the government finally decides to release the information.
No, it wasnt a government job
I did hear that there was intelligence before 9/11 that there would be an attack, but the Bush administration didnt think it was likely and didnt respond.
" 9/11 conspiracy theories are just a breeding ground for kooks. I mean fucking Dan Aykroyd thinks aliens won't come near us because of it. "annnnd what does that have to do with the essential questions surrounding 9/11?
sure, there are cooks everywhere, just because thats a fact doesn't mean everyone is a cook. theres a bunch of kooks on this site, does that mean everyone here is one?
I don't think it will ever happen, as it would always be bad for the government's, their agencies' and the country's image." I don't know. But all I know was a lot of lives were lost in 9/11. Regardless of conspiracy, it was a tragic event. A new investigation should be initiated. It probably won't happen now, but maybe a decade or two later. A investigation now could cause too much controversy. Even when a investigation concludes, it may be some years before the government finally decides to release the information. "
So it is not even worth wondering, as the secret to what really happened is buried in a whole deeper than a chinese regime's prision.
It doesn't matter. 9/11 was a tragedy, and anybody that spends their time dwelling on "Did the government do it?" must not know what it feels like to have lost lives in it. Now I can't say I know that feeling, but show some respect.
No, mainly because you'd have to be pretty stupid to buy into it. *lights shield on fire* OK, I'm ready.
to me, i just think that a new investigation is absolutely necessary and that all the info on 9/11 should be released to the public, including all of the footage from the pentagon. there are little things that standout to me. 1 the buildings in NYC, all 3 of them, collapsed identically and perfectly in on themselves just because of fire?! hmmmm And the "hijackers" passport that was "found" almost entirely unscathed on the street is absolutely fucking ridiculous.
Yes i know in my heart that 9/11 was an inside job. You can cry and argue about how the buildings fell down but I just want to WHY they fell down. Just remember this, there were no jews in the trade centers also all the big ceo's didn't show up for work that day. Somebody knew something before hand.
i have lost loved ones in terrible accidents before. sure it wasn't 9/11, but its no different to me. a murderer kills somebody, it feels the same no matter where and when it happened. now if i found a ton of evidence that what i was told about that wasn't what actually happened, i would want to know the fucking truth. this is in no way direspectful to those who lost their lives. if infact what we were told isn't true, any of it, then those people deserve the truth to be revealed." It doesn't matter. 9/11 was a tragedy, and anybody that spends their time dwelling on "Did the government do it?" must not know what it feels like to have lost lives in it. Now I can't say I know that feeling, but show some respect. "
This reminds me of the time that my friend showed me a video of some internet documentary called Zeitgeist if i remember correctly.. and that was just retarded, not only did they insinuate that the US government was behind 9/11 but they also claimed that the US was basically behind every attack that ever happened to them going all the way back to the first World War. i think they said in the video that they do this shit to get the people of America riled up for War so they can invade whoever they like.
While i was watching this my "Conspiracy Theorist Nut Job" Detector was going off like crazy and i couldn't help but just stand there slack jawed at the sheer rediculousness of what i was watching.. but what made me laugh was the almost terrifying seriousness my friend was taking of the whole thing.. So i smacked him.
it was one of the most major events in HISTORY. sorry, nobody is getting over any time soon." what seriously this again, get over it "
" Talk about a leading ass way to present the poll. We know how the OP feels about it. "and you have a bush avatar, retard.
BTW, for anyone who might believe any of the bullshit theories regarding 9/11, here's a great site that debunks all of it.
http://www.debunking911.com/
why would the government want to give itself a huge fucking problem to deal with? The only thing I would say is that we should consider that we knew that terrorists were planning an attack we just assumed they wouldn't be able to be so successful and we were wrong.
" No, and anybody who thinks so is a fucking idiot that needs to be destroyed. "I don't understand why anyone who thinks that some parts of 9/11 are fishy is automatically labeled a kook.
Hell, the 9/11 commission itself admitted that a full investigation has never been undertaken and that a lot is still left unexplained.
HELL, most of the people out there who want it looked into are the people who's family members died during the attack.
@VisariLoyalist said:
" why would the government want to give itself a huge fucking problem to deal with?for money. Money rules everything.
"to me, i just think that a new investigation is absolutely necessary and that all the info on 9/11 should be released to the public, including all of the footage from the pentagon. there are little things that standout to me. 1 the buildings in NYC, all 3 of them, collapsed identically and perfectly in on themselves just because of fire?! hmmmm And the "hijackers" passport that was "found" almost entirely unscathed on the street is absolutely fucking ridiculous. "
"[One], the building in NYC, all 3 of them. . . " All three of them? I was under the impression that Twin Towers implied two not three.
Also, if I was an evil American President that wanted to set-up Al-Qaeda for war why would I have the CIA/FBI plant a passport that linked to a terrorist? Why? Al-Qaeda took credit gladly for 9/11 attacks, there is no reason to plant a connection between the two. Now I realize your issue with the unscathed passport, and that it is "absolutely fucking ridiculous", but really why would they plant a passport?
Technically 7 buildings fell." @TwoOneFive said:
"to me, i just think that a new investigation is absolutely necessary and that all the info on 9/11 should be released to the public, including all of the footage from the pentagon. there are little things that standout to me. 1 the buildings in NYC, all 3 of them, collapsed identically and perfectly in on themselves just because of fire?! hmmmm And the "hijackers" passport that was "found" almost entirely unscathed on the street is absolutely fucking ridiculous. ""[One], the building in NYC, all 3 of them. . . " All three of them? I was under the impression that Twin Towers implied two not three. Also, if I was an evil American President that wanted to set-up Al-Qaeda for war why would I have the CIA/FBI plant a passport that linked to a terrorist? Why? Al-Qaeda took credit gladly for 9/11 attacks, there is no reason to plant a connection between the two. Now I realize your issue with the unscathed passport, and that it is "absolutely fucking ridiculous", but really why would they plant a passport? "
Well, they were at least damaged.
A lot.
" BTW, for anyone who might believe any of the bullshit theories regarding 9/11, here's a great site that debunks all of it.that's a half assed web sites and doesn't explain the majority of the major issues people have with the situation.
http://www.debunking911.com/ "
So you believe it's possible that a tiny passport made up of mostly paper could survive being in a airplane that smashes straight into the WTC, which completely explodes, and end up on the street looking like it wasn't even damaged at all?! where is that debunked? that shit is totally fucking stupid.
" @CitizenKane said:It's sad that victim's families get roped in with all the crazies but c'mon. Most of the fervor and demand comes from people spewing horse crap from their face." No, and anybody who thinks so is a fucking idiot that needs to be destroyed. "I don't understand why anyone who thinks that some parts of 9/11 are fishy is automatically labeled a kook. Hell, the 9/11 commission itself admitted that a full investigation has never been undertaken and that a lot is still left unexplained. HELL, most of the people out there who want it looked into are the people who's family members died during the attack. "
I don't see how 9/11 being fishy is particular to anything. Hell anything that happened in history can be thought of the same way so to me it's business as usual. Is the final answer perfect? Of course not but it never will be and the investigation was as good as it's going to get. By now I bet there's plenty of credible sources that debunk the myths but also fill in the gaps or correct errors the official report made.
Here I told myself I wouldn't respond to this thread. Son of a bitch.
" @Feser said:yeah, they were damaged, but the main structural integrity remained intact. those building we're right beside the towers. building 7 was not, and yet out of the blue it just collapsed, perfectly, in on itself.Technically 7 buildings fell. Well, they were at least damaged. A lot. "" @TwoOneFive said:
"to me, i just think that a new investigation is absolutely necessary and that all the info on 9/11 should be released to the public, including all of the footage from the pentagon. there are little things that standout to me. 1 the buildings in NYC, all 3 of them, collapsed identically and perfectly in on themselves just because of fire?! hmmmm And the "hijackers" passport that was "found" almost entirely unscathed on the street is absolutely fucking ridiculous. ""[One], the building in NYC, all 3 of them. . . " All three of them? I was under the impression that Twin Towers implied two not three. Also, if I was an evil American President that wanted to set-up Al-Qaeda for war why would I have the CIA/FBI plant a passport that linked to a terrorist? Why? Al-Qaeda took credit gladly for 9/11 attacks, there is no reason to plant a connection between the two. Now I realize your issue with the unscathed passport, and that it is "absolutely fucking ridiculous", but really why would they plant a passport? "
" @Meteora said:*shrugs* Maybe, maybe not. I think I recalled there being investigations on something, I can't recall if its the assassination of President Kennedy. I think that was it, but I can't find the source for it.I don't think it will ever happen, as it would always be bad for the government's, their agencies' and the country's image. So it is not even worth wondering, as the secret to what really happened is buried in a whole deeper than a chinese regime's prision. "" I don't know. But all I know was a lot of lives were lost in 9/11. Regardless of conspiracy, it was a tragic event. A new investigation should be initiated. It probably won't happen now, but maybe a decade or two later. A investigation now could cause too much controversy. Even when a investigation concludes, it may be some years before the government finally decides to release the information. "
" @Jeust said:Yep, there can be one, but there will be hardly any conclusions coming out of it. There are too many interests at stake." @Meteora said:*shrugs* Maybe, maybe not. I think I recalled there being investigations on something, I can't recall if its the assassination of President Kennedy. I think that was it, but I can't find the source for it. "I don't think it will ever happen, as it would always be bad for the government's, their agencies' and the country's image. So it is not even worth wondering, as the secret to what really happened is buried in a whole deeper than a chinese regime's prision. "" I don't know. But all I know was a lot of lives were lost in 9/11. Regardless of conspiracy, it was a tragic event. A new investigation should be initiated. It probably won't happen now, but maybe a decade or two later. A investigation now could cause too much controversy. Even when a investigation concludes, it may be some years before the government finally decides to release the information. "
" @CitizenKane said:exactly. I don't understand what makes people get defensive on this topic." No, and anybody who thinks so is a fucking idiot that needs to be destroyed. "I don't understand why anyone who thinks that some parts of 9/11 are fishy is automatically labeled a kook. Hell, the 9/11 commission itself admitted that a full investigation has never been undertaken and that a lot is still left unexplained. HELL, most of the people out there who want it looked into are the people who's family members died during the attack. "
That's my take on it anyway. Frankly I don't really give a shit.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment