I heard you guys don't like depressing news.
Kelly Brook to pose nude for Playboy in $500,000 deal | The Daily Telegraph
Like this but missing the bra:
Kelly Brook to pose nude for Playboy for $500,000
" So just tits? Playboy is behind the times and deserves to fail. "Never underestimate the power of boobies.
Oh man, boobs are amazing, if only there were some way to look at them for free instead of buying a magazine that's geared more towards my grandfather's generation than anything else. Oh I know it's any of the multitude of free porn sites/random porn images that can easily be found by typing boobs into Google.
$500k seems like a waste of money for that chick. Is she famous or something? You could doll up a porn star with huge tits for like $10k. Why drop that type of bread on a C-rate actress?
" $500k seems like a waste of money for that chick. Is she famous or something? You could doll up a porn star with huge tits for like $10k. Why drop that type of bread on a C-rate actress? "Because she's incredibly hot.
" "Playboy is an iconic publication which is known across the world as a sophisticated title ." Wait, what? "Hehehe.
" @Gamer_152 said:You win." "Playboy is an iconic publication which is known across the world as a sophisticated title ." Wait, what? "More like "pubic"ation. Right? Right? "
This almost sounds Zen-like. Could be a haiku, given some work:" Women, in USA, are like products you see in Wall Mart "
USA women,
Like the products at Wal-Mart
Not fluent English.
That chick's pretty internet famous, and she's got 34E's. I'm not surprised they paid her that much (they've paid more for other "famous" women to pose). I look forward to seeing them show up all over the internet months before the magazine hits the shelf.
" @sickVisionz said:Not half a million hot imo." $500k seems like a waste of money for that chick. Is she famous or something? You could doll up a porn star with huge tits for like $10k. Why drop that type of bread on a C-rate actress? "Because she's incredibly hot. "
" $500k seems like a waste of money for that chick. Is she famous or something? You could doll up a porn star with huge tits for like $10k. Why drop that type of bread on a C-rate actress? "If she looks good which she obviously does, who cares what her profession is?
" @sickVisionz said:No female is pretty enough to pay $500k just to take a picture of her. If you're going to super cake off on her, she should at least have some sort of clout or fame imo. C-rate actress =/= that level of clout or fame. Imo." $500k seems like a waste of money for that chick. Is she famous or something? You could doll up a porn star with huge tits for like $10k. Why drop that type of bread on a C-rate actress? "If she looks good which she obviously does, who cares what her profession is? "
She did full frontal back when she was an unknown model for Loaded magazine. I remember someone had a 4 foot poster of her up in the dorm room - almost life size snatch staring at you while trying to finish overdue coursework while shovelling down cereal is not the best wat to wake up.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment