Oklahoma Democrat Adds 'Every Sperm Is Sacred' Amendment To ...
I caught this first on The Daily Show and thought the Democrat Senator ammendment was real, until doing a bit of reading. Still, it makes for a very interesting topic of life and women's rights. So I throw the question out ........ when is human life or a foetus, a human?
Right off the bat, I am going to come clean and state that I am against abortion.
I am against abortion, for me. Being male, I am unlikely to ever need one. Whatever any woman chooses to do is entirely NOT my business. It isn't anyones business. It certainly isn't the governments business. It absolutely isn't Church business. However, at whay point do we decide that the foetus is a human and has rights?
The Bill in question wants to define it as conception, or as The Daily Show put it as a sperm enters an egg ..... not a person, not a person, not a person, a person. I personally think that is insane. It would make the morning after pill illegal for a start. I am happy to see it defined as a human before birth, assuming it is a completely viable birth - not a vaguely possible birth. Even then, given the right medical circumstances, a woman should still have a right the kill the feotus (I say kill as that is what you are doing, call a spade a spade). If someone attacks a woman and kills the foetus, they can't be charged with murder. I think that there should be a specific law that deals with that, as the impending mother has suffered great loss and the law should reflect that, but it still can't be murder as it is a foetus, not a human - in my veiw.
So what do you think? Is it an attack on Women's Rights? Is it looking after the unborn? Do your religious views or lack thereof colour your outlook? Should a Bill like this ever succeed?
Log in to comment