Harry Potter the Deathly Hallows Part 2 (The game) will sell like Call of Duty no matter that the game is only average. Parents will see it and say "Hey, Billy likes that movie right let's get him this". And Young children will nag there parents untill they get it, so it will sell a ton. So game companies are going to want to make more Harry Potter games, so what will the next game be?
Where will the Harry Potter franchise go?
Harry Potter and the Game Where The License Adds Absolutely Nothing To The Game But Makes It Get Way More Sales Though So Whatever
Some sort of Hogwarts MMO, like that one wizards MMO, but based on actual Harry Potter, not just copied.
Also Kinect support.
I dunno, I just can't see any good games coming from the franchise.
Maybe a RPG? (You know, turnbased and shit) with some original character ( a student at hogwarts, your own story, no 'saving potter in the shadows' shit ) whom you can customize in looks and spell schools.
Don't know shit about HP tho, so just throwing it out there, the movie tie in games were awful.
I imagine that now is the time where we could start to see good Harry Potter movies. Not having to adhere to the plot lines and content of the films opens up the universe to a lot of potential creativity. And not having a hard deadline designed to coincide with a movie could help to.
Whatever though--wizards should have staffs and beards, not little wands and spectacles.
I'd guess that they'll make a second Lego Harry Potter game to cover the rest of books in the series. Beyond that, I feel like they should move away from the 'generic-third-person-cover-based-shooter' rut they found themselves in.
As some people were saying, a year-by-year RPG would suit the Harry Potter fiction best. Though, unless you have some sort of extracurricular hook each year (like how Harry, Ron and Hermione had to sneak off and fight ultimate evil) it'll just be a school simulator that lacks practical application of the magic you're being taught.
Normally after the franchise completes, you get some game that's more "loyal" to the books, or whatever. And that tanks. Then you toy with an MMO, but that falls short. Then you go "let's stick to Legos so we don't wallow in complete limbo like the LOTR franchise is". So that's the pathway. Do the shirt LOTR did, then that stuff fails, then make more lego games.
Harry Potter the Deathly Hallows Part 2 (The game) will sell like Call of Duty no matter that the game is only average. Parents will see it and say "Hey, Billy likes that movie right let's get him this". And Young children will nag there parents untill they get it, so it will sell a ton. So game companies are going to want to make more Harry Potter games, so what will the next game be?Wait a second... it will sell like Call of Duty? Isn't Black ops like the best selling.... thing ever? I hardly doubt HArry Potter will even come close...
Well, the lack of movies didn't stop the Lord of the Rings or Star Wars franchises, so what makes you think that'll stop Harry Potter?
I'm sure we'll get a Quidditch game (another one, probably with Kinect controls), a Harry Potter Hogwarts Academy game where it's basically a mini-game collection for the Wii/PS Move, stuff like that.
@Aronman789 said:
Some sort of Hogwarts MMO, like that one wizards MMO, but based on actual Harry Potter, not just copied. Also Kinect support.
I would play the shit out of that. No Kinect support though.
@Hizang said:Maybe he meant Call of Duty 2.Harry Potter the Deathly Hallows Part 2 (The game) will sell like Call of Duty no matter that the game is only average. Parents will see it and say "Hey, Billy likes that movie right let's get him this". And Young children will nag there parents untill they get it, so it will sell a ton. So game companies are going to want to make more Harry Potter games, so what will the next game be?Wait a second... it will sell like Call of Duty? Isn't Black ops like the best selling.... thing ever? I hardly doubt HArry Potter will even come close...
Rowling is stubborn as hell about her property, so I wouldn't be surprised if we didn't see anything. Apart from the Encyclopaedia she's "supposedly" writing .
@Ventilaator said:
Harry Potter and the Game Where The License Adds Absolutely Nothing To The Game But Makes It Get Way More Sales Though So Whatever
Really the shitty third person shooters wouldn't exist without the license so there's that.
A series of 20 third person shooters based on The Beedle and The Bard.
I think the harry potter world has incredible potential for a game. Look at Bully, that was a school game done really well. If they built an open world game in that universe with hogwarts and hogsmeade and diagon alley and all those locations. It would be really really good! They just have to nail the feel of the gameplay! And i dont know how they would do that!
I think like most literature that is appreciated more as the written word and the readers’ imagination that games will never really take off. I rather doubt an MMO or RPG would work in the long term for the setting & characters of that world. The games are hampered by being made for teens as well. Can you make an M-Rated (R-Rated) Harry Potter? Sure, but I rather doubt JKR allow it despite the fact her book series deals with threat, evil, and even death. Tween worlds are always riding that razors edge of threat without going over, but where is the threat if in the game were you want player action to matter?
You cannot say, "Whoops we killed Ron," that simply is not allowed. In a game you cannot say, "In my game play Harry and Hermione Granger are in love." So where is the FUN and game play? Where is the game action with consequence when you have 'life on the line' without death?
This is not just an issue with these books either. Eventually, game will have to say to other mediums, "Sorry YOUR rules of narrative cannot matter in the game." They will have to say, "In the LotR game Strider/Aragorn can die in Bree and the Hobbits have to run away on their own to meet another helpful character." or in the Maltese Falcon video game, "Sam Spade shoots Joel Cairo the first time he meets him because that is how the player did it." Games are about player agency, and only now are game developers exploring that idea where the only action that ends the game is everyone that matters being dead or out of the action.
That is the only Harry Potter game I would play, where I choose what my character does and does not do. I would only enter an MMO Potter game where I can do anything up to and including slitting Harry's creamy white throat, flirting with Hermione Granger, or using magic to turn Ron into a girl.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment