Something went wrong. Try again later

Atomic_Tangerine

This user has not updated recently.

360 0 0 1
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Atomic_Tangerine's forum posts

Avatar image for atomic_tangerine
Atomic_Tangerine

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Atomic_Tangerine

@Supermarius:

Oh ya, I get that they were about exploration and finding alternate routes and stuff, it's just that those parts where by far my least favorite parts of the Sonic games.  If I wanted that out of a platformer, I went for Super Mario World. 
 
I kinda hate Sonic 3 and Knuckles for what it did to Sonic in general though, and that's not really fair.  Sonic Adventure may be weighed down by all the stupid characters, but it wasn't SO bad with Knuckles.  It was still novel at that point.  I'm projecting my hate for recent, terrible Sonic games on the ones that were merely OK.   
 
Sonic 2 was still the best though!  Just gotta throw that out there.

Avatar image for atomic_tangerine
Atomic_Tangerine

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Atomic_Tangerine
@CodyCrook said:
" @Supermarius said:
" There are alot of game series that the GB crew incorrectly hate or ignore. Someone should keep a list. Just some things that would go on it are: Blazblue, Pokemon, Sonic & Knuckles (seriously, wtf Jeff), Just Cause 2, nippon ichi stuff, etc "
They said they liked Just Cause 2 but some stuff in it (as with almost every open world game like it) is janky "

Yeah, apparently a 4 or 3 star review counts as "hating." Really man, some of those games don't get hated on as much as have valid criticisms leveled against them.  I have been unable to complete a Pokemon game in a real long time because they are so similar.  Knuckles isn't a fun character in a Sonic game as his special moves slow the game down, removing the game's biggest strength.  And the Nippon Ichi stuff?  Dude, you, I, and even the people who make the games know that stuff isn't exactly mainstream. To hold it against somebody that they don't dig it is just nuts.    
 
Getting back to the main topic... THE GAME GOT A 3 STAR REVIEW!  Jeff thought the game was okay, but just wasn't a huge fan.  If you can't see some of the reasons why people wouldn't enjoy that game, you are very sheltered.  I bought that game, and didn't have much fun because of the game's failure to explain its own mechanics, and the annoying style and voices didn't compel me to keep going.
 
Avatar image for atomic_tangerine
Atomic_Tangerine

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Atomic_Tangerine

I always liked it when he said, "Jimmy's here."  But for real, he has to say it at SOME point.
Avatar image for atomic_tangerine
Atomic_Tangerine

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Atomic_Tangerine

Still don't get why you would boost man.  At best, you are beating people who are bad at the game and won't get any better yourself.
Avatar image for atomic_tangerine
Atomic_Tangerine

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Atomic_Tangerine
@Darkstar614 said:
"You can't ever really get "boxed in" because if you fail to rescue someone, you get sent back a week in time to try again. "

Okay, that's good to hear.  I was a bit worried that a week of game time wasn't very much at all, but I'm guessing it's enough to grind out some extra XP and chumpatize whoever needs chumpatizing at the next boss battle or whatever that I would get stuck on.
Avatar image for atomic_tangerine
Atomic_Tangerine

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Atomic_Tangerine

This is stupid.  They actually did that sort of stuff with Shadowrun, and nobody liked it on either end. 
 
The other thing is that video games on PCs are doing fine.  It is just that they high-end games with minimum requirments that melt your face aren't there anymore.  Whether you want to believe that is because of the economy, piracy, or something else is up to you.
Avatar image for atomic_tangerine
Atomic_Tangerine

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Atomic_Tangerine
@endaround said:
"No you can't really box yourself in.  You do need to do a bit of schedule management but you don't have to worry about whether a choice in the beginning of the game will kill you at the end.  It might make it easier but nothing to big.  If you play on easy you;ll have less worries.  This isn't a Fire Emblem game where if you have the wrong people kill enemies in the first battles you're gimped midgame onwards "

Okay, that's what I was scared of, that this game would make it so I forgot to talk to the right dude at the start and would then just be unable to beat something 40 hours down the line because my guy isn't social with the right people.
 
I don't play a ton of RPGs, but I'm not exactly terrible at them.  I mean, I beat Sephiroth and Kefka on my first try.  Then again, I am stuck at the end boss for a bunch of RPGs... 
So If I pick easy, is that REALLY easy, or can I just pick normal and be okay?  I mean, with games the way they are today, normal is the new easy, but I don't want to run throught the whole game without losing a single time or something like that.
Avatar image for atomic_tangerine
Atomic_Tangerine

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Atomic_Tangerine


I'm sorry for not reading through the forums to find out this stuff, but I just have a huge feeling that at this point in time, every thread will mention late-game plot details and stuff assuming everybody knows them, because if you are on this forum, you probably do.  However, I bought this game on release and just finally took the shrink-wrap off and was thinking about playing it, as I heard that it was a much more structured game than Persona 3, which I turned off after about 5 hours as I was just paralyzed by the amount of choices I had.  Having to keep on a schedule just seems so nuts for a game like this.

 

So what I am asking is whether or not I can box myself into what could potentially be an unwinnable game at any point.  It seems like the game has a hard time-limit almost like the first Pikmin or Dead Rising, and while I could beat those games without much issue, this is an RPG.  I put points into the wrong stat, and next thing you know I'm at a boss fight that I can't win.  I remember hearing that if you don't get to a certain point in different sections on the game that the guy in the velvet room sends you back in time or something.  Is that true, and do you keep levels and stats and S-links and stuff like that?   
 
Once again, sorry if this is obvious, it is just that as much as I enjoy my bizarre Japanese games, this one is almost impenetrable in parts with all of its complex systems that it doesn't want to explain.

Avatar image for atomic_tangerine
Atomic_Tangerine

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Atomic_Tangerine

I really like how half the internet seems to exist in an alternate universe where Modern Warfare 2 isn't one of the best online shooters out there.  Charging a subscription for the existing game or something similar is a rip-off, but that's not an indication of the quality of the game.  It's just that there aren't much in the way of server-side costs for them to justify it, unless they are planning on really going nuts with adding crazy awesome features.
Avatar image for atomic_tangerine
Atomic_Tangerine

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By Atomic_Tangerine


Most of the time, the word boycott is thrown around in ways that don't make sense.  Usually, when people say they are "boycotting" a game, it is because there is something with the game that makes them think it won't be as good.  Lack of dedicated servers in MW2 was one, and the idea that the game was a rehash was the big reason for the supposed Left 4 Dead 2 boycotts.  The problem is that if you are not buying a game because you don't think you will like it, then that isn't a boycott.  Using that sort of logic, I have boycotted Nickelback, Twilight, Need for Speed after Most Wanted, most sports games, and comedies starring Adam Sandler filmed after Happy Gilmore.  Most boycotts are just people who are vocal about not liking something, while a boycott is when you refuse to buy something you actually really want or need to prove a point.

 
Refusing to buy the cheaper clothing because it is made by Indonesian children is a boycott.  Refusing to buy a video game because you don't like something about it is simply not buying something, nothing more.