Hey guys,
I can understand some of the outrage that this statue has caused, but I can also see why the folks at Deep Silver didn't anticipate this type of public response.
At first glance, it might appear that the statue dehumanizes the female body, saying that the most important feature of a woman's body are her big breasts - she doesn't need any limbs, a head, or a brain, she's just a piece of sexualized meat. I totally understand this view, but I don't think this was the intention of the creators.
In Dead Island, you hack and slash up zombies. The game's biggest and most notable feature is the ability to selectively chop off the limbs that you want, and players may just eventually chop off every limb leaving the torso by itself. The creator's wanted to showcase the bizarre nature of the game by having this statue.
Moreover, they wanted this statue to be a commentary on human sexuality as well. The intention of the statue wasn't to turn people on or to say what is or should be important on a female body, but rather they wanted to show the horrors of a zombie outbreak. Simply put, they wanted to turn somebody that was once beautiful or overly sexualized into something that is absolutely grotesque and unrecognizable.
In the end, the zombie problem actually tries to make us forget about our ideals and stereotypes of body image. It says to me that rather than fighting on our differences that - hate, racism, sexism, and all forms of discrimination must be abandoned to survive in a world where none of that matters. And it's a little bit ironic.
Amazingly, this could have been what actually happened. A smart commentary on how little this stuff would matter in a ruined world. It's just the wrong place for it. It's not presented as a commentary on anything or even as art, but as a trophy to reward you for paying more for a pre-order. Presented as it is, it's a literal commodity for sale rather than a form of artistic expression. Context is funny like that.
Log in to comment