Something went wrong. Try again later

iamjohn

This user has not updated recently.

6297 13905 76 143
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

iamjohn's forum posts

Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

143

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1  Edited By iamjohn

For one, please don't patronize me when you're not explaining what you mean and using circular logic.  For two, your explanation could just as easily be applied to the five-star scale, duder.

Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

143

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2  Edited By iamjohn

I'd be more interested if I wasn't completely put off by Drawn to Life.  I'm holding back until I see that the creation aspects are more than just a window dressing of a gimmick meant to hide the fact that the game isn't so good.

Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

143

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3  Edited By iamjohn
pirandello said:
""fun" it's not meaningless if you see it in contrast to "generic"."
YOU'RE NOT EXPLAINING ANYTHING!  WHAT MAKES ONE TYPE OF RATING SYSTEM "FUN" AND ANOTHER "GENERIC"?  HOW DO THESE ADJECTIVES MODIFY SOMETHING AS ABSTRACT AS A RATING SYSTEM IN A MEANINGFUL WAY THAT DICTATES WHY ONE RATING SYSTEM IS SUPERIOR TO ANOTHER?!

Good lord, I feel like I'm talking to a wall!
Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

143

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By iamjohn

The Rodeo Burger.  Some people consider it a brilliant, ingenious creation; others (and I know many of them) think of it as an affront to burgerkind.  What say you, Giant Hambombger crowd?

Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

143

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5  Edited By iamjohn

You sure do like telling us your favorite and least favorite things, don't you?

Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

143

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6  Edited By iamjohn

We're basically retreading the old NeoGAF meme of "So basically GAME is BETTER THAN/WORSE THAN/AS GOOD AS, DEPENDING ON THE SCORE, UNRELATED GAME" that fools ended up taking seriously and that's why it's banned.  Scores, especially those for games in different genres, aren't intended to be compared to each other for numerous reasons and they never were.  This thread is proof positive as to why.


pirandello said:
and why shouldnt scores be fun? who the fuck are you to tell me what i can regard as fun or not?
Because what does this even mean?  What dictates a score being "fun" as opposed to being "a number"?  When is a score not "fun"?  Fun is completely meaningless in this context.
Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

143

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7  Edited By iamjohn

Since when are review scores supposed to be fun?  What are you even talking about?


And having a second score defeats the purpose of having the original score!  The 5 says "you should play this game, no matter what!"  Your ridiculous two-score suggestion completely undermines this.
Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

143

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8  Edited By iamjohn

Fire Emblem sucks because forever death is lame and annoying, and it doesn't have British gents that drink tea and transform into giant steampunk robots of death.


Unlike Henry Hatsworth in the Puzzling Adventure!!


Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

143

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By iamjohn

If it was as good as Xbox Live, then probably.  But it's not, so I wouldn't.

Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

143

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10  Edited By iamjohn

Giant Bomb has always been at war with Eurasia.


ALTERNATE RESPONSE: truth be told, I think Dr_Cash might be Emmanuel Goldstein.