TruthTellah's forum posts

#1 Posted by TruthTellah (8409 posts) -
Online
#2 Posted by TruthTellah (8409 posts) -

@truthtellah said:

I think that's a two-way street. You're responding rather strongly despite the mildest of concern over one of your comments. As you said, different opinions are different opinions, and I can appreciate that some people feel differently about this topic. What concerns me is when someone just decides to mock the people discussing it and suggest that caring about equality is "bullshit".

You came in and spoke dismissively of anyone that felt differently than you do about this, and that's the problem. Since then, you've been saying how you just don't like that anyone is being dismissive of different opinions, but your mocking comment that I originally responded to actively dismissed the concerns of others. We can agree or disagree. That's all good. But being mocking and dismissive of those concerned here is what's unfortunate.

It's not my fault that you felt yourself in that phrase ;) The idea is simple, what are you doing here is far away from fighting for equality.

All the acting is bullshit because no such topic will ever change, whatever keeps the industry gaming floating on the surface, or any other industry. It's getting shittier when some people believe that they can give orders to others, also what to do in this case and they overreacting - you are contradicting yourself from the very beginning. That kind of specie who called me a douche, she could say it directly without explaining why she made me a douche, like her first world problem is the topic's demography and her life will get better if she would accomplish whatever the hell she is trying to. Some of you are being like her "oh, what a bad topic, it's worse than when my puppy died"... "my life was depending on this topic, now I am angry" I can't even imagine someone getting really angry (you getting red, trembling and sweating ?) in front of the laptop/PC because of this reason, like you have no other problem at all in reality. All your justifies/opinions are amusing me, but I still don't come here and pee with acid on the way you express them. Nowhere says that we are not allowed to make fun of this topic, so, I don't know why you keep coming with this cheap morality to tell me in a nice way to fuck off and never write here - not to mention that we are strangers, you should realize that you can't just tell someone what to do. Talking about responsibility - funny. Using such big words, does not spice up your replies. People like you should be your first concern. Then you come with the other bullshit "we are fellow dudes/ human beings in reality" I tell you what, mister human being, do a private topic where you and all your fellow dudes can lick each other's butts with the same opinion, so you will not be disturbed at all, while scrolling down and suddenly your retina stumbles into my posts. I am not replying to you anymore, you understand everything I say just like a brick.

Well. Okay...

See you around I suppose.

Online
#3 Edited by TruthTellah (8409 posts) -

@truthtellah said:

@greggd said:

I'm speechless right now.

I can't find any evidence of this tweet. All I can find is an empty twitter page with one tweet about shaq. Is this just a fake example tweet?

Does Twitter archive tweets that are years old? I can't confirm it's authenticity, but I definitely remember seeing this tweet a long time ago.

Twitter posts do remain for years, they just aren't part of the Twitter search function at a certain point. If you go to someone's page, though, you should still be able to find tweets from far back. I mean, I have a few twitter accounts that were used for select events over the years, and I just checked out some old tweets from four years ago. So, yeah, they're around.

This twitter account only has one tweet that says "shaq". Maybe they deleted this tweet, but it still seems odd that it was the only meaningful tweet they ever made. Maybe someone can figure it out. Just seems off to me.

Online
#4 Edited by TruthTellah (8409 posts) -

If the GTAV is coming to PC in Spring 2014... why wouldn't it come to the Xbox One and PS4? It may take a little effort, but people would still likely buy the heck out of it.

I would anticipate a Xbox One and PS4 version in Spring or that Fall, maybe with the DLC wrapped up in an "Ultimate" edition or something along those lines.

Online
#5 Edited by TruthTellah (8409 posts) -
Online
#6 Edited by TruthTellah (8409 posts) -

@gnatsol said:

The design is not stupid/silly/disgusting. Yal continue to judge games by real-world standards when they are works of fiction where everything goes. IF this angers you or impacts you wrongly then you're just looking to get rattled.

Stop crying hypocrites. Hideo has a new game coming out and you make this the topic at hand? It is you individuals that single these things out and it is also you individuals that exacerbate the issue. You then prance around with excuses like wanting change but either have not made any or wont any extra effort into what so greatly effects you. Just like how censorship of any kind is like working backwards. Whatever you censor calls for more demand/lust for said thing. Many of us have the natural urge of seeking out what, in a way, is locked away from us figuratively speaking. Censorship mystifies which in effect attracts attention/attraction/ and desire to unveil. It begs you to make sense of something already natural.

Who are you yelling at, man? David Ellis? A random melange of people somewhere out there in the void?

Online
#7 Posted by TruthTellah (8409 posts) -

@greggd said:

I'm speechless right now.

I can't find any evidence of this tweet. All I can find is an empty twitter page with one tweet about shaq. Is this just a fake example tweet?

Online
#8 Posted by TruthTellah (8409 posts) -

@jasonr86 said:

@truthtellah said:

@jasonr86 said:

@joshwent said:

Welp, tried to have a little real discussion for a bit. Knew that was a bad idea.

Threads like this make me want to never, ever read threads like this, or really any other ones. Giant Bomb used to actually be different than the rest of the flamewar igniting meme posting pointless cesspool internet.

It's changed.

GAME OVER MAN!

I bet if us rational people ignored the irrational people and just talked amongst ourselves the irrational people would lose their control over these topics and the rational people could actually have a good conversation.

Hey, I'm rational and left a post on this page! Comment on what I said and we'll discuss causing a trend!

I don't happen to hold your same opinion on this matter, but I can understand where we may differ in perspective. I hope you can acknowledge that my concern over this does not in any way require that you share said concern; I aim only to express my opinion on an aspect of a game and the process by which characters like this are designed. :)

Word.

Straight up.

Online
#9 Edited by TruthTellah (8409 posts) -

@jasonr86 said:

@joshwent said:

Welp, tried to have a little real discussion for a bit. Knew that was a bad idea.

Threads like this make me want to never, ever read threads like this, or really any other ones. Giant Bomb used to actually be different than the rest of the flamewar igniting meme posting pointless cesspool internet.

It's changed.

GAME OVER MAN!

I bet if us rational people ignored the irrational people and just talked amongst ourselves the irrational people would lose their control over these topics and the rational people could actually have a good conversation.

Hey, I'm rational and left a post on this page! Comment on what I said and we'll discuss causing a trend!

I don't happen to hold your same opinion on this matter, but I can understand where we may differ in perspective. I hope you can acknowledge that my concern over this does not in any way require that you share said concern; I aim only to express my opinion on an aspect of a game and the process by which characters like this are designed. :)

Online
#10 Posted by TruthTellah (8409 posts) -

@pr1mus said:

@truthtellah said:

@hailinel said:

@truthtellah said:

@e30bmw said:

@truthtellah: It took people like 2 months to figure out that J.K. Rowling wrote that book earlier this year and she's way more popular/famous than Fish could ever hope to be. So if it was done right, he could probably keep it secret for a decent amount of time.

I think it's a little different. I mean, we're on Giant Bomb. Every time a new game is announced with a new developer, we go to work making a page about it and looking up what details we can. People will wonder about a new developer, especially if the game looks at all interesting. And the moment someone on NeoGAF goes, "Hey, guys, this looks pretty nice for someone's first game...", they'll pour over everything they can to figure it out. They'll either find him out or get game news outlets to ask, "Who is this really?"

Having said that, I still think it's a fun idea, and I'm all for it. heh. Seems like good natured fun that might even work for a while. Have Phil Fish dress like an otaku with a big beard and no glasses and pitch his game. It'd be great!

I don't think Fish has the social skills to pull that off, sadly.

I don't know. I think he could surprise us.

Or, at least, his attempt to do so would be mildly entertaining in a "The Phantom Pain has a fake developer that is all bandaged up" sort of way.

Phil Fish is CG confirmed!

#teamCG

Actually, Phil Fish is actually just one of Kojima's many alternate identities, and the man who is called "Phil Fish" is just a puppet controlled by nanomachines. Why else would he trash on Japanese games? To get us off the scent, obviously!

That seems... way too plausible.

Which means... Fez 2 is actually the third act of MGSV.

Online