Too Human reviews
TheHDRoom : 79/100
IGN : 7.8/10
IGN UK : 7.5/10
Gamepro : 4/5
Teamxbox : 6.5/10
Gamespy : 2.5/5
TVG : 8/10
NZgamer : 7.5/10
Eurogamer : 6/10
Planetxbox360 : 87/100
OXM : 7/10
Strategy informer : 8.5/10
Worthplaying : 6/10
Gamespot : 5.5/10
Giant Bomb : 3/5
Greece Games Magazine : 93/100
Game Informer : 6.75 and 7
Im not really surprised at the low to average scores are. Silicon Knights have never really produced an entirely Awesome original game, most of their games have been average at best.
I always look at the developers, more then not that will tell you the quality of the finished product. They are average at best.
"denis dyack is going to reign hell down on epic."I don't think Dyack can blame boring, unpolished combat, lack of real variety in player classes, enemy types and skills, or a multitude of other poor design decisions on the Unreal Engine. I think Dyack can really only blame Dyack.
these reviews aren't mixed...honestly regardless of how eligible you think they are(because reviews are always out in other countrys also, but people normal don't acknowledge them) just stop counting the greek thing, so far its had all 70 ish and high 60 review scores....I guess Dyack will be making more of a fool out of himself to neogaff then he thought.
"hellknight8619 said:exactly, he didn't use the unreal engine anyway, soon as they scrapped it he constantly said he thinks its the worst engine that is out now,and it bothers him that so many people think its good and use it...even though their initial intention was using it theirself...so that makes a lot of sense."denis dyack is going to reign hell down on epic."I don't think Dyack can blame boring, unpolished combat, lack of real variety in player classes, enemy types and skills, or a multitude of other poor design decisions on the Unreal Engine. I think Dyack can really only blame Dyack."
"I'll be honest, im not that fussed on the game, HOWEVER i have started to question some of the reviews (not just scores) at 1up these days. This isn't the first time i've found them to be overly critical. "I've always thought of EGM/1UP as the elitist record store clerks of the game review world, and I kind of like them that way. Honestly, even if you don't agree with them I think it's important to have a major outlet that isn't afraid to be (sometimes a little too) critical.
"The reviews aren't terrible, so that's a good sign. I really just want to know how the story is now, this 7 average leads me to believe it will be fun, and if the story is up to par with ED, then I will love it."If what they show of the story in the demo is any indication, prepare to be disappointed.
"Well to be fair, They have not been developing the game for 10 years, the idea of the game has been around for 10 years though. I think Dennis said it has been 4 years in development, but it is a little embarrassing getting these low scores for 4 years of work.
you can fall throguh the ground in a game that took 10 years to make?
Thats the equivalent of being able to wall hack in Duke Nuken Forever."
It got a 3/5, its hardly even deserving if a video review, but if there is one its cool...just people need to be less picky...if a game gets 4/5 or 5/5 I'd say its worth a video review, if not you got all the info you need right there in the rating and written review regardless.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.