wow... these are really mixed

You forgot, Gameinformer gave the game a 6.75 in their magazine...which really isn't saying much considering that Gameinformer are so PS and PC biased.

GameInformer was a 6.75 AND a 7. You also forgot the Polish magazine.

Must really depend on the player.
I didn't mind the game so much, but it wasn't overly awesome either.

Too much hype I think. I wasn't wowed by the demo like I felt I should. I'll probably rent it and play through it, since it's going to be a trilogy and all.

Im not really surprised at the low to average scores are.  Silicon Knights have never really produced an entirely Awesome original game,  most of their games have been average at best.

I always look at the developers, more then not that will tell you the quality of the finished product.  They are average at best.

didn't have high hopes for this games

denis dyack is going to reign hell down on epic.

FYI Denis is posting in this NeoGAF forum. 

"The 1up review was crap."

"denis dyack is going to reign hell down on epic."

I hope this game does relatively well. My gut is telling me the reviews are going to be very mixed across the board.

Any new videos?

these reviews aren't mixed...honestly regardless of how eligible you think they are(because reviews are always out in other countrys also, but people normal don't acknowledge them) just stop counting the greek thing, so far its had all 70 ish and high 60 review scores....I guess Dyack will be making more of a fool out of himself to neogaff then he thought.

"hellknight8619 said:

"denis dyack is going to reign hell down on epic."

I don't think Dyack can blame boring, unpolished combat, lack of real variety in player classes, enemy types and skills, or a multitude of other poor design decisions on the Unreal Engine. I think Dyack can really only blame Dyack."

Too bad its getting such bad reviews, I was honestly looking forward to playing it but I'll guess I'll skip it now.

Just goes to show that once a game goes through Development Hell, it just be garbage: looking at you Duke Nukem!!

I'll be honest, im not that fussed on the game, HOWEVER i have started to question some of the reviews (not just scores) at 1up these days. This isn't the first time i've found them to be overly critical.  

I dunno, I liked the demo a lot, but I just dropped almost 90 bones on the Fable 2 LE.

"I'll be honest, im not that fussed on the game, HOWEVER i have started to question some of the reviews (not just scores) at 1up these days. This isn't the first time i've found them to be overly critical.  "

"I dunno, I liked the demo a lot, but I just dropped almost 90 bones on the Fable 2 LE."

Ouch. Well, Nintendo fans will be relieved since this was originally supposed to be a Gamecube title.

I thought Eternal Darkness was the bee's knees.

I'm still going to pick it up.  I like the demo a lot, and I enjoyed other games that got poor reviews, like Timeshift and Darksector.

Perhaps Dyacks words will come back to bite him.

I've added GI. BTW IGNs review goes up tomorrow at 6AM PST.

The reviews aren't terrible, so that's a good sign. I really just want to know how the story is now, this 7 average leads me to believe it will be fun, and if the story is up to par with ED, then I will love it.

I spent 2 hours downloading the demo and then spent 45 seconds playing it before I decided I didn't want it.

"The reviews aren't terrible, so that's a good sign. I really just want to know how the story is now, this 7 average leads me to believe it will be fun, and if the story is up to par with ED, then I will love it."

If you look at 1up's reviews, the C- here is equivalent of what they gave Pokemon Battle Revolution.  So...yikes.

"You forgot, Gameinformer gave the game a 6.75 in their magazine...which really isn't saying much considering that Gameinformer are so PS and PC biased."

wow...I guess this game sucks. I dont know if I should sink 60 bucks into this

We'll have a review at 6PM tonight. That's less than 30 minutes from right... now!

Kind of speaks to the quality of the game when the reviews are (presumably) embargoed until the day before/day of release, no?

"We'll have a review at 6PM tonight. That's less than 30 minutes from right... now!"

I wonder whats gonna happen with the whole GAF thing now after this. Either way the game looks like its nothing too special but I think its not bad.

you can fall throguh the ground in a game that took 10 years to make?

Thats the equivalent of being able to wall hack in Duke Nuken Forever.

"

you can fall throguh the ground in a game that took 10 years to make?

Thats the equivalent of being able to wall hack in Duke Nuken Forever.

"

GB review is up. Its 3/5.

It doesn't even matter to me anyways, the ONLY reviews I have learned to take the least bit seriously are Gamespot's, IGN's, and GiantBomb's. Besides them, I take nobody seriously.

IGN review is up. it 7.8/10

These aren't really mixed - the general trend in the scores indicate that its a mediocre game.

Gamepro review is up.it got 4/5.

Gamespot gave it a 5.5 apparently. Not sure if anyone said this already, just went around and looked at all the reviews.

errr nm, too late

"You forgot, Gameinformer gave the game a 6.75 in their magazine...which really isn't saying much considering that Gameinformer are so PS and PC biased."

Still waiting for GB's video review...

It got a 3/5, its hardly even deserving if a video review, but if there is one its cool...just people need to be less picky...if a game gets 4/5 or 5/5 I'd say its worth a video review, if not you got all the info you need right there in the rating and written review regardless.

Why oh why Denny D? Perhaps I will call you Denise Dyack until you redeem thyself with a polished game. Perhaps you should look at a Polish game if you want to see polish. I would recommend The Witcher. You could make a sequel called Too Humaner! :P