Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    L.A. Noire

    Game » consists of 17 releases. Released May 17, 2011

    L.A. Noire is a detective thriller developed by Team Bondi in Australia and published by Rockstar Games.

    L.A. Noire. Fantastic game, but we need new consoles bad.

    • 57 results
    • 1
    • 2
    Avatar image for dtat
    dtat

    1750

    Forum Posts

    546

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 9

    Edited By dtat

    I love this game, but that's not what this blog post is about. I'll just cut to the chase. After playing games on the PC almost exclusively for the last 4 months, coming back to the consoles was incredibly jarring. L.A. Noire looks fantastic, but DEAR. LORD. The framerate. I've gotten used to playing games with AA cranked all the way up and still getting a solid 60 FPS. I'm not what you'd call a graphics whore, but when I'm playing a game, poor framerate can really destroy the experience. Mind blowing graphics don't always make things better, but high framerates DO. 


    We need new consoles not because graphical fidelity needs a huge generational leap, but because current hardware cannot handle the kinds of big games developers want to make while delivering the kind of smooth framerate necessary for a seamless, immersive experience. I'm sorry. 20 to 30 FPS just doesn't cut it. If you don't believe me, try playing Mass Effect 2 or Batman: Arkham Asylum on a modern gaming rig, then go play them on 360. I dare you. It's now very obvious to me that this generation of consoles needs to be replaced and soon.

    Note: I am not knocking L.A. Noire. It is fantastic. Just a realization I came to and I needed to air my grievances.
    Avatar image for dtat
    dtat

    1750

    Forum Posts

    546

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 9

    #1  Edited By dtat

    I love this game, but that's not what this blog post is about. I'll just cut to the chase. After playing games on the PC almost exclusively for the last 4 months, coming back to the consoles was incredibly jarring. L.A. Noire looks fantastic, but DEAR. LORD. The framerate. I've gotten used to playing games with AA cranked all the way up and still getting a solid 60 FPS. I'm not what you'd call a graphics whore, but when I'm playing a game, poor framerate can really destroy the experience. Mind blowing graphics don't always make things better, but high framerates DO. 


    We need new consoles not because graphical fidelity needs a huge generational leap, but because current hardware cannot handle the kinds of big games developers want to make while delivering the kind of smooth framerate necessary for a seamless, immersive experience. I'm sorry. 20 to 30 FPS just doesn't cut it. If you don't believe me, try playing Mass Effect 2 or Batman: Arkham Asylum on a modern gaming rig, then go play them on 360. I dare you. It's now very obvious to me that this generation of consoles needs to be replaced and soon.

    Note: I am not knocking L.A. Noire. It is fantastic. Just a realization I came to and I needed to air my grievances.
    Avatar image for sins_of_mosin
    sins_of_mosin

    1713

    Forum Posts

    291

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 27

    User Lists: 7

    #2  Edited By sins_of_mosin

    My theory is that people who say they aren't whores are the ones who always complain about fps. Honestly, I swear some people can't just play a game, they have to inspect every technical detail.  ZOMG it went from 40fps to 20fps for 2 seconds during a huge event.. zomggggggggg

    Avatar image for lordxavierbritish
    LordXavierBritish

    6651

    Forum Posts

    4948

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 6

    #3  Edited By LordXavierBritish

    I didn't even notice it had an FPS problem.

    Does it have an FPS problem?

    Also I can't tell the difference between different rates of FPS.

    Avatar image for wuddel
    Wuddel

    2436

    Forum Posts

    1448

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #4  Edited By Wuddel

    I haven't gotten the game yet. So I speak in general but I hear you. Haven gotten a decent PC recently, after a 15 years on mid-range stuff and work-laptops, I currently enjoy the spoils of PC gaming. But most games I rather play relaxed on my armchair in front of my tv. So yeah the framerate and the loading times are not helping the immersion. Problem is that a console giving 60 fps is still to expensive to make. Especially because we need basically 120 fps (or at least 60+) because of 3D TVs.

    Avatar image for protomessiah
    protomessiah

    103

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 6

    User Lists: 0

    #5  Edited By protomessiah

    Im sure that pc games run better and all that, but honestly I cant tell the difference when Im playing the vast majority of games. For my hard earned cash Im very happy with the current consoles and don't want to buy a new generation of them for at least a few years.

    Avatar image for dystopiax
    DystopiaX

    5776

    Forum Posts

    416

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #6  Edited By DystopiaX
    @sins_of_mosin said:
    My theory is that people who say they aren't whores are the ones who always complain about fps. Honestly, I swear some people can't just play a game, they have to inspect every technical detail.  ZOMG it went from 40fps to 20fps for 2 seconds during a huge event.. zomggggggggg
    theres a difference between whoring and wanting a great technical experience. You dont need to be a graphics whore to notice <60 fps.
    Avatar image for wrighteous86
    wrighteous86

    4036

    Forum Posts

    3673

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 1

    #7  Edited By wrighteous86

    Shhh.... the more people say we need new consoles, the more people will start believing that.


    I don't wanna buy new shit until 2014 at the earliest. Not counting replacing the Wii of course... I still haven't gotten a PS3 yet!
    Avatar image for dtat
    dtat

    1750

    Forum Posts

    546

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 9

    #8  Edited By dtat
    @sins_of_mosin said:
    My theory is that people who say they aren't whores are the ones who always complain about fps. Honestly, I swear some people can't just play a game, they have to inspect every technical detail.  ZOMG it went from 40fps to 20fps for 2 seconds during a huge event.. zomggggggggg

    Yes I inspected every technical detail by saying the choppy framerate slightly impacted my experience. Well done sir.
    @LordXavierBritish said:
    I didn't even notice it had an FPS problem.Does it have an FPS problem?Also I can't tell the difference between different rates of FPS.
    I've just really gotten used to silky smooth framerates. I wouldn't say it's a huge problem, but the realism in the faces and the performances are really hampered by the framerate at times. When people move quickly they sort of sputter across the screen. I found it jarring.
    Avatar image for benjaebe
    benjaebe

    2868

    Forum Posts

    7204

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 6

    #9  Edited By benjaebe

    I totally agree with what you're saying, but just out of curiosity which console were you playing on? I've had friends who play the 360 version complain about the frame rate though I haven't really experienced many drops on the PS3.

    Avatar image for tebbit
    tebbit

    4659

    Forum Posts

    861

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 6

    #10  Edited By tebbit

    Uncharted 2 laughs at your concerns.

    Also, what the heck are you talking about with Arkham Asylum? That game had a fantastic framerate on the consoles, I don't remember a single dip when I played it on the 360.

    Avatar image for canucks23
    canucks23

    1081

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #11  Edited By canucks23
    @sins_of_mosin said:
    My theory is that people who say they aren't whores are the ones who always complain about fps. Honestly, I swear some people can't just play a game, they have to inspect every technical detail.  ZOMG it went from 40fps to 20fps for 2 seconds during a huge event.. zomggggggggg
    It's not just a 40 to 20 drop in this game, it has really noticable drops every now and again and it can get annoying. On the 360 version at least.
    Avatar image for daveyo520
    Daveyo520

    7766

    Forum Posts

    624

    Wiki Points

    198

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 12

    #12  Edited By Daveyo520

    I think we are fine. We are good enough and good enough is good enough.

    Avatar image for afroman269
    Afroman269

    7440

    Forum Posts

    103

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #13  Edited By Afroman269

    Ya I'm noticing the drops on the PS3 version. Kinda annoying.

    Avatar image for animasta
    Animasta

    14948

    Forum Posts

    3563

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 5

    #14  Edited By Animasta

    it's too bad LA noire doesn't have a PC version huh, but I've given up on rockstar and if they don't want any of my money than that's their business

    Avatar image for dtat
    dtat

    1750

    Forum Posts

    546

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 9

    #15  Edited By dtat

    I'm playing it on PS3 by the way. It's not so much drops in FPS as it is just a consistent low FPS. As I walk along, I can literally see the edges of the screen jerking as they move forward.


    @Tebbit said:
    Uncharted 2 laughs at your concerns.Also, what the heck are you talking about with Arkham Asylum? That game had a fantastic framerate on the consoles, I don't remember a single dip when I played it on the 360.
    I've played it both on the 360 and on my PC. It has decent framerate on 360, but it doesn't compare with 60 FPS. So smooth...
    Avatar image for ntm
    NTM

    12222

    Forum Posts

    38

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #16  Edited By NTM

    While I'm ready for new systems, I'm not ready to put away current gen systems, which I inevitably do when newer systems come along. And L.A. Noire looks great and I may get it sometime very soon. By the way, I've been thinking about upgrading the PC. I've never done it before, but I'd like to at some point since there's a lot of newer games coming out like Battlefield 3.
    Avatar image for playastation
    playastation

    256

    Forum Posts

    346

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #17  Edited By playastation

    Have you ever went back to the original mario kart on the snes? you can literally count the frames of animation on the track

    Avatar image for slaker117
    Slaker117

    4873

    Forum Posts

    3305

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    #18  Edited By Slaker117

    This is something I realized when playing AC2. I thought the game looked great, but the frame rate was unsteady and people took forever to spawn into the world. There is only so much you can do with asset fidelity, but simply putting more power into a similar architecture would help problems like these.

    Avatar image for claude
    Claude

    16672

    Forum Posts

    1047

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 18

    #19  Edited By Claude

    I wouldn't be surprised to see new consoles in this order. Nintendo 2012, Microsoft 2013 and Sony 2014.

    Microsoft and Sony will announce E3 2012.

    With that speculation out of the way, Nintendo is the card holder with their hardware. If it's nothing more than a small upgrade over MS and Sony's current generation, I think MS will go harder the next year. If you've noticed, Microsoft's first two consoles have been closer to a PC than the other consoles. Microsoft's next console will be even more of a PC based TV type console with lots and lots of interactivity with Windows based products.

    Avatar image for president_barackbar
    President_Barackbar

    3648

    Forum Posts

    853

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    @Wrighteous86 said:
    Shhh.... the more people say we need new consoles, the more people will start believing that.

    I don't wanna buy new shit until 2014 at the earliest. Not counting replacing the Wii of course... I still haven't gotten a PS3 yet!
    When LA Noire needed to be on 3 discs on the 360, its time to start thinking about new consoles.
    Avatar image for kingzetta
    kingzetta

    4497

    Forum Posts

    88

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #21  Edited By kingzetta

    no

    Avatar image for dtat
    dtat

    1750

    Forum Posts

    546

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 9

    #22  Edited By dtat
    @playastation said:
    Have you ever went back to the original mario kart on the snes? you can literally count the frames of animation on the track
    And your point?
    Avatar image for louiedog
    louiedog

    2391

    Forum Posts

    227

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #23  Edited By louiedog
    @playastation said:
    Have you ever went back to the original mario kart on the snes? you can literally count the frames of animation on the track
    Frame counters ruined competitive Mario Kart.
    Avatar image for andorski
    Andorski

    5482

    Forum Posts

    2310

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #24  Edited By Andorski

    I'd rather have developers push for other graphics styles other than realism.  Current Robert Zemeckis animated movies aren't able to pass to the other side of the uncanney valley, so I'd imagine video games are far away from hitting such an achievement.  Create an art style that the consoles can actually render well and that can age well.  Even PC games like Crysis 2 on it's highest settings will look like outdated in a decade.  Yet Wind Waker still looks awesome.

    Avatar image for jeust
    Jeust

    11739

    Forum Posts

    15085

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 15

    #25  Edited By Jeust

    Personally I think a new generation despite the new techs that will bring will be bad for consumers. If the graphical prowess continues to climb so do the development costs for the software houses, and that means less high profile games, heavier prices, and less variety and number of releases. And probably a more accentuated bet on the DLC and indie games. 


    Also I don't want to fork a heavy sum of money for a new console, despite liking the possibility of buying a PS3 at bargain price.

    So no, I don't look forward to it.
    Avatar image for kjellm87
    Kjellm87

    1735

    Forum Posts

    2788

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #26  Edited By Kjellm87

    They could, but I doubt they want. At least for now.

    Avatar image for dtat
    dtat

    1750

    Forum Posts

    546

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 9

    #27  Edited By dtat
    @Andorski said:
    I'd rather have developers push for other graphics styles other than realism.  Current Robert Zemeckis animated movies aren't able to pass to the other side of the uncanney valley, so I'd imagine video games are far away from hitting such an achievement.  Create an art style that the consoles can actually render well and that can age well.  Even PC games like Crysis 2 on it's highest settings will look like outdated in a decade.  Yet Wind Waker still looks awesome.
    But better hardware will enable those creative graphics styles to be more beautiful. Super Mario Galaxy is a good example of that. Wouldn't it look better on an HD console? If you read what I wrote in my original post, I expressly stated that graphical fidelity doesn't necessarily need another generational leap, but I do feel that current hardware restricts what developers can do especially visually. Graphical horsepower enables artistic vision to flourish. Smoother framerates and higher resolutions are always a good thing. They are not an end unto themselves; they are tools.
    Avatar image for privateirontfu
    PrivateIronTFU

    3858

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #28  Edited By PrivateIronTFU
    @Andorski said:
    Current Robert Zemeckis animated movies aren't able to pass to the other side of the uncanney valley, so I'd imagine video games are far away from hitting such an achievement.
    I don't know. LA Noire faces are way less creepy and way more emotive than any Robert Zemeckis film I've seen.
    Avatar image for dragonzord
    dragonzord

    846

    Forum Posts

    362

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #30  Edited By dragonzord

    Really, LA Noire is the thing that made you think we need new consoles? Not how insane Witcher 2 looks?

    Avatar image for dtat
    dtat

    1750

    Forum Posts

    546

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 9

    #31  Edited By dtat
    @zoner said:
    Really, LA Noire is the thing that made you think we need new consoles? Not how insane Witcher 2 looks?
    First game I've played on a console in months. That's why.
    Avatar image for captain_clayman
    captain_clayman

    3349

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #32  Edited By captain_clayman

    i agree dude. after getting a PC, consoles look like crap.  its not usually the graphical fidelity, it's those framerates.  it used to not bug me but after playing PC games, it bugs the hell out of me.

    Avatar image for pooffballzzzz
    PooffBallzZzZ

    94

    Forum Posts

    1201

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #33  Edited By PooffBallzZzZ

    noticed some FPS issues on the xbox for sure.  Thought it was just cuz my xbox is old.

    Avatar image for fjordson
    fjordson

    2571

    Forum Posts

    430

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #34  Edited By fjordson

    I haven't experienced the framerate issues you mentioned, but I'm not going to disagree that the current consoles are getting a bit long in the tooth.

    Avatar image for festeringneon
    FesteringNeon

    2297

    Forum Posts

    1683

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 2

    #35  Edited By FesteringNeon

    Right as I got into this gen of consoles from PC, the biggest thing that stood out to me was the lack of good AA. The jaggies took awhile to adjust to, but all is history at this point.

    Avatar image for somedelicook
    SomeDeliCook

    2353

    Forum Posts

    61

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #36  Edited By SomeDeliCook
    @Dtat said:
    I love this game, but that's not what this blog post is about. I'll just cut to the chase. After playing games on the PC almost exclusively for the last 4 months, coming back to the consoles was incredibly jarring. L.A. Noire looks fantastic, but DEAR. LORD. The framerate. I've gotten used to playing games with AA cranked all the way up and still getting a solid 60 FPS. I'm not what you'd call a graphics whore, but when I'm playing a game, poor framerate can really destroy the experience. Mind blowing graphics don't always make things better, but high framerates DO. 

    We need new consoles not because graphical fidelity needs a huge generational leap, but because current hardware cannot handle the kinds of big games developers want to make while delivering the kind of smooth framerate necessary for a seamless, immersive experience. I'm sorry. 20 to 30 FPS just doesn't cut it. If you don't believe me, try playing Mass Effect 2 or Batman: Arkham Asylum on a modern gaming rig, then go play them on 360. I dare you. It's now very obvious to me that this generation of consoles needs to be replaced and soon.

    Note: I am not knocking L.A. Noire. It is fantastic. Just a realization I came to and I needed to air my grievances.
    Rage will run at 60 FPS on both consoles. Whats the point of me saying this? Simple.
    Optimization needs to improve. I've seen shitty looking games run at low FPS on consoles but good looking games with a higher framerate.
    Avatar image for dtat
    dtat

    1750

    Forum Posts

    546

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 9

    #37  Edited By dtat
    @SomeDeliCook: There's a reason it's rare to see games with great visuals running at high framerates on consoles. Putting the onus on developers to optimize their games for 6 year old hardware is a little unreasonable. You really limit what they can do that way.
    Avatar image for donpixel
    DonPixel

    2867

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #38  Edited By DonPixel

    I was playing a lot in my ps3 a couple of months back.. and I didn't want to know anything about new consoles. Then I bough a new PC.. currently playing Witcher 2 at medium spec looks way better like WAY BETTER than anything in any consoles.. so yeah I think it's time 1080p full ass HD new consoles.. My body is ready. 

    Avatar image for clstirens
    clstirens

    854

    Forum Posts

    15

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #39  Edited By clstirens
    @SomeDeliCook said:
    @Dtat said:
    snip
    Rage will run at 60 FPS on both consoles. Whats the point of me saying this? Simple.
    Optimization needs to improve. I've seen shitty looking games run at low FPS on consoles but good looking games with a higher framerate.
    This.

    Although, you can't optimize an Atari to run like an NES, you can still churn a bit more out of the current consoles.

    Honestly, though, the biggest issue will be convincing gamers that the next gen is worth it, when the graphical gains are likely to be less apparent.
    Avatar image for napalm
    napalm

    9227

    Forum Posts

    162

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #40  Edited By napalm
    @Dtat said:
    @SomeDeliCook: There's a reason it's rare to see games with great visuals running at high framerates on consoles. Putting the onus on developers to optimize their games for 6 year old hardware is a little unreasonable. You really limit what they can do that way.
    It's more the fact that not everybody is as fuckin' smart as John Carmack.
    Avatar image for clstirens
    clstirens

    854

    Forum Posts

    15

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #41  Edited By clstirens
    @Napalm said:
    @Dtat said:
    @SomeDeliCook: There's a reason it's rare to see games with great visuals running at high framerates on consoles. Putting the onus on developers to optimize their games for 6 year old hardware is a little unreasonable. You really limit what they can do that way.
    It's more the fact that not everybody is as fuckin' smart as John Carmack.
    Not to say he isn't good at what he does, but we haven't actually SEEN most of what Rage has to offer.  For all we know, it could be the most boring technical achievement ever.
    Avatar image for napalm
    napalm

    9227

    Forum Posts

    162

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #42  Edited By napalm
    @clstirens: Have you actually fucking seen how amazing Rage looks? Not only technically, but set design looks immensely wonderful, and all of the action running at sixty through-and-through will make for something awesome.
    Avatar image for clstirens
    clstirens

    854

    Forum Posts

    15

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #43  Edited By clstirens

    .@Napalm
    Hmm.. Perhaps I have not been up on rage. I'm pretty versed on some of the technology they've used in rage, but I haven't seen much footage I guess. Good to hear, actually.

    Avatar image for milkman
    Milkman

    19372

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #44  Edited By Milkman

    I have a confession to make. I can rarely ever tell when a game has a bad frame rate. I've gotten better at it over the last year or so but most of the time, I can't tell the difference if a game is running at 30 FPS or 60.

    Avatar image for willylo
    willylo

    331

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #45  Edited By willylo

    I've not noticed much of a frame rate issue on the PS3 version, I played my buddies 360 version first though and there definitely was some noticable drops there.

    Avatar image for getz
    Getz

    3765

    Forum Posts

    1003

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 4

    #46  Edited By Getz
    @DystopiaX said:
    @sins_of_mosin said:
    My theory is that people who say they aren't whores are the ones who always complain about fps. Honestly, I swear some people can't just play a game, they have to inspect every technical detail.  ZOMG it went from 40fps to 20fps for 2 seconds during a huge event.. zomggggggggg
    theres a difference between whoring and wanting a great technical experience. You dont need to be a graphics whore to notice <60 fps.
    There's gotta be some sort of nerd dictionary, the way people are arguing over the minutia of what being a "graphics whore" entails. I want references, damn it!
    Avatar image for liquidprince
    LiquidPrince

    17073

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #47  Edited By LiquidPrince

    I still feel it's too early for new consoles. Should release by 2013.

    Avatar image for dystopiax
    DystopiaX

    5776

    Forum Posts

    416

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #48  Edited By DystopiaX
    @Getz said:
    @DystopiaX said:
    @sins_of_mosin said:
    My theory is that people who say they aren't whores are the ones who always complain about fps. Honestly, I swear some people can't just play a game, they have to inspect every technical detail.  ZOMG it went from 40fps to 20fps for 2 seconds during a huge event.. zomggggggggg
    theres a difference between whoring and wanting a great technical experience. You dont need to be a graphics whore to notice <60 fps.
    There's gotta be some sort of nerd dictionary, the way people are arguing over the minutia of what being a "graphics whore" entails. I want references, damn it!
    Not sure what position you're taking, all I'm saying is that wanting decent performance isn't the same as graphics whoring.

    And yeah that term is really ill defined.
    Avatar image for getz
    Getz

    3765

    Forum Posts

    1003

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 4

    #49  Edited By Getz
    @DystopiaX: So I gotta take a position now? I'm just content being a smart-ass from the side-lines.
    Avatar image for re_player1
    RE_Player1

    8074

    Forum Posts

    1047

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #50  Edited By RE_Player1

    My PS3 still seems new to me. I can wait until for a holiday 2014 release for a PS4.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.