@Knight244 said:
The hypocrisy here makes me want to cry when there's a quicklook up for a game called Lollipop Chainsaw and an ad for Tomb Raider on this very page with an image of a women who looks like she's been beaten. At what level of blindness are you operating? In fact one could make a good argument that the caricatures of women that video games are filled with is far more backwards then the booth babes themselves. Booth babes are actual women but Lara Croft for example has always been a warped cartoon character and now her new "realistic" make over appears to be in the service of men who like to see women get hurt really badly. In short I'm pretty sure the entire world has come off the rails.
This site covers videogames, more so the quicklook for Lollipop Chainsaw actually featured the excessive "sexy" nonsense in that game as a negative and there has been many a talk on the bombcast about the intentions behind Tombraider culminating in some of them saying very dramatically "Fuck this game!"
I'm all for getting some better female characters in games in fact let's all continue that discussion but it does not mean that we cannot still discuss the issue that this article talks about. Also this article seemed to transition into talking about the booth babes by stating that it seemed a bit ridiculous now that we are having these conversations about Tomb raider and such that we continue to see booth babes.
Personally my two cents are that if the mobile 3ds platforms (M3Ps) were given much more of an informational role in which they act more as presenters then M3Ps then it might be a bit less noticeable and distracting in it's immaturity. In addition I believe the car argument to be untenable due to the simple fact that cars, or more importantly those shows, appeal to a specific audience and are not a broad medium like vidya games. This is not to say that the concept of the booth babe is untenable in of itself, in my opinion all it takes is having them double as presenters of the product, knowing the product, and being able to go get a press kit for Vinny.
Also I'd like to thank @patrickklepek for specifically opening up the article as a debate and not simply stating all of this as his rock god decree. I presume that's what this meant:
That’s okay--we should have a debate about it.
Lastly I'd like to thank the GiantBomb site for not posting pictures of themselves body slamming people whilst sporting neckbeards...
Log in to comment