Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

140 Comments

Transformers: War For Cybertron Review

3
  • PC
  • PS3
  • X360

War For Cybertron might be the best Transformers game ever made... but that isn't exactly a high bar to best.


And yeah, he still has that big energy axe. 
And yeah, he still has that big energy axe. 
When you consider the history of the Transformers franchise in video games, it's easy to want to celebrate War For Cybertron as some kind of revelation. High Moon's third-person shooter is quite a bit better than just about any Transformers game you could think of. But take it away from those easy comparisons and start to think about third-person shooting at large, and you'll find a pretty cool set of online options that are paired up with shallow, repetitive gameplay that only manages to get by if you've got some sense of nostalgia for the original set of Transformers toys or cartoons.

The game's story is set before just about every single event you can think of in the Transformers timeline, giving you some information about what the Autobots and Decepticons were doing before they crash-landed on Earth. This gives you some Transformer origins, since at the outset of the game, Optimus Prime is just "Optimus," and he isn't yet the leader of the Autobots. Starscream is unaffiliated, though he quickly falls in line when he first encounters Megatron, who is attempting to infect the planet Cybertron with "dark energon," an unstable form of energy that manifests itself as big crystal formations. The campaign itself is set chronologically, though for the first half of the game you play as the Decepticons, who gain control of the dark energon and use it to subvert the planet and attempt to take over. At halftime, you switch to the Autobot side of things, which is a bit more interesting since the Autobot side tends to actually fight named Decepticons, including fights against Starscream and Soundwave. For the most part, both factions are just mercilessly beating up generic drones that take the form of cars, jets, tanks, and so on. These enemies have no personality and aren't much fun to fight. Also, while it's totally understandable why the game's designers would need to cook up a bunch of easily repeatable enemies, it doesn't really feel like Transformers when you're just bashing robot after robot as you trudge ahead.

The game itself is a third-person shooter that feels like something of a throwback to the days before hiding behind things was so important. Though you can certainly manually stand behind a lot of objects, there's no proper cover system, and the game almost wants to rub it in by occasionally having your AI partners take proper cover during in-game cutscenes. Strafing in and out of cover feels kind of silly. Also, the game is more focused on resource management than you might expect. You're constantly looking for more ammo packs, and there were multiple occasions where I was completely running out of ammo for every single weapon I had on me. Many of the various pistols, launchers, rifles, and sniper weapons also eject cartridges as they're fired, and the weapons don't really feel like the unlimited laser blasts you might expect from a Transformer.

 The cars grip the road when boosting, but typically just hover around at will.
 The cars grip the road when boosting, but typically just hover around at will.
Of course, the big thing about being a Transformer is that you can turn into something else at the touch of a button. Though the toys were often very unique in their transformations, here every character is boiled down into one of four character classes and a couple of different vehicle types. Every single ground-based vehicle, be it a car, truck, or tank, hovers and can strafe back and forth. While each class does get some unique abilities, the similarities between the ground-based vehicles makes most of the vehicle forms feel generic. One class turns into jets, but rather than give you full-on dogfights, these jets sort of hover in place and don't feel as threatening as they probably should. You can boost in each vehicle, too, which gives you a good forward burst of momentum. This leads to what is probably the coolest part about the entire game. When you're driving and boosting ahead, if you transform back into robot form, you'll often slide on your knees for a brief period of time due to all of that speed. It looks pretty rad.

For the most part, the game looks nice, but the metallic world of Cybertron doesn't lend itself particularly well to a lot of environmental variety. The actual Transformer designs are some of the best around, with robots that sort of split the difference between the original 1980s cartoon designs and their pre-Earth, Cybertronian forms. You'll easily be able to identify guys like Optimus Prime, Soundwave, Bumblebee, Jazz, and others just by appearance. In vehicle form, things get a little crazier, and there's something thematically incorrect about having Soundwave turn into some kind of hover van, though he does turn into something that at least resembles a tape deck during one cutscene. The sound effects are spacey and very heavy on the metal-on-metal contact that you get from running, falling, using a melee attack, or just about anything else. Since the game always has three Transformers together during the campaign, you'll get a fair amount of chatter. The voice of Optimus Prime, Peter Cullen, once again reprises his role in War For Cybertron. He does a good job, but something about the dialogue he's given seems even more overwrought and dramatic than Prime's lines usually do.

The multiplayer modes let you play any campaign level cooperatively with up to three players. You can jump in or jump out of strangers' games, though the game has to be created as a co-op game--you can't have people join you on the fly if you're starting out in the solo mode. There's also a wave-based survival-type mode called Escalation that feels sort of like the Call of Duty: World At War Nazi Zombies mode, as you'll need to pay off vending machines for additional ammo, weapons, and health. Up to four players can play on two maps.

The war for Cybertron might get pretty bloody. Or, well, actually... how about oily? 
The war for Cybertron might get pretty bloody. Or, well, actually... how about oily? 
The main, competitive multiplayer sticks to the player persistence and unlockable add-ons that became so popular back in Call of Duty 4, but it maintains some semblance of its class-based structure. Each of the four classes gets its own weapon selections and killstreak bonuses, and you'll level up each class individually to unlock additional perks and abilities. Some of these let scouts stay cloaked longer or provide health bonuses to your entire team. Then there's martyrdom, which does exactly what it sounds like, but it drops "thermo mines" instead of hand grenades. Some of the similarities seem shameless, but it's a proven system that works, so it's not a negative thing to see this style of multiplayer applied to a very different-feeling game.

The multiplayer, which allows up to 10 players at once, offers standard shooter modes, like team deathmatch, node control modes, and a couple of takes on capture the flag. Though it sometimes feels like melee attacks are a little too effective, the competitive side of War For Cybertron is its strongest suit. The abilites feel useful and it's way more fun to take on human opposition than it is to grind through the monotonous campaign. It probably won't replace whatever popular shooter you're currently hooked on, but War For Cybertron's multiplayer makes for a good diversion.

That's really the best thing that can be said about Transformers: War For Cybertron. Its campaign is only worth seeing through if you're extremely curious to see how it ties into some of the other Transformers lore out there, and the multiplayer is solid, if perhaps a bit uninspired. It's a good diversion that'll keep you engaged for a few days, but don't go in expecting long-term excitement.    
Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

140 Comments

Avatar image for chiefmegadeth666
CHIEFMEGADETH666

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Edited By CHIEFMEGADETH666

As a gamer 1st and a Transformers Fan 2nd,i totally disagree with jeff...
This is a solid game...
Campaign is longer then most campaigns about 12hours this day and age 6hours is the standard,good to see them make it long...And thats in co op mind you.
Graphics look pretty sweet,Gameplay is awesome,Multiplayer packs a hell of a punch
Its the total package...Lag free gaming at it's best!on day 1!
I give it 9/10 
jeff is way wrong about this game...but theres alot more positive reviews on this game,and alot of happy campers from the user reviews
Jeff is still best reviewer out there!

Avatar image for perryvandell
PerryVandell

2223

Forum Posts

1705

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 8

Edited By PerryVandell
@AlwaysAngry said:
" @Fullmetal216 said:
" @SnailBumps said:
" Eat shit Jeff, this game is tits "
@MjHealy said:
" What Jeff says, goes! "
@Delta_Ass said:
" 3 stars, Jeff? This is bad comedy.
 
EDIT: To put it into perspective, is this game really on par with such luminaries as Dark Void and Alpha Protocol? Come the fuck on. "
I really hope that the above people are being sarcastic, for this is one of the most irritating things I can see when viewing the comments of a review. For some reason, people don't understand that a review is an opinion and just because you disagree with the review, doesn't mean that the review or the person is bad. Again, if all three of these are sarcasm, then my mistake, but it's hard to stand idly by, when crap like this happens. "
Yeah, it's an opinion. But when you have thousands of people looking at your review, you have to think more objectively. I can rate Fallout 3 2/5 stars, but if I was a professional reviewer, I wouldn't review the game because I know it doesn't deserve that rating, it's just my shitty opinion.   For real though, I hate Fallout 3... "
I can see what you are getting at (I don't like Kingdom Hearts, but I can see why others would), but even though the majority of others disagree with you, that alone isn't enough of a reason for someone to not review a game.
Avatar image for brackynews
Brackynews

4385

Forum Posts

27681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 48

Edited By Brackynews
@Fullmetal216: Yep. I appreciated the Bombcast background of Brad's history with Final Fantasy. He is the right bomber to review 13.  I like it one star more than he did, but the review ain't wrong.  I also like pineapple and chicken on my pizzas.  Don't eat my damn pizza if you don't like it.  Just get one you enjoy. There's no shortage. (And turn down that damn rap music.)
 
Sometimes I miss the old Gamespot formula system that included Reviewer's Tilt, because that told me a lot about the staff.  95% of all user reviews seem to have a tilt of 10 or 1, why take the time unless you're passionate about it either way.  It's the objective and thoughtful ones that are most interesting to read.... people playing genres outside of their normal experiences.  I didn't know what the hell to think about Darwinia, so that's what I wrote about.
Jeff's words rang true in 2007 and they do today.  

But no matter how many changes to our review system we make, there's one thing we simply can't account for, and that's your own personal taste.... So consider the hidden feature of our new review system to be your own common sense, which all of our new information must be filtered through.

Avatar image for jmartnwa
JMartNWA

208

Forum Posts

18

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By JMartNWA

I rented it... I've finished the Decepticon campaign and am moving on to the Autobots... other than a rather generic environment... where most everything looks remarkably similar, and generally fighting a limited set of opposition, in varying forms, I have thoroughly enjoyed it.  Truthfully, even a game like Gears was not known for its wealth of different enemies, along with most games.  Infamous was one of the three best games of last year for me but the enemies were not exactly varied.  There are levels of opposition, some with added skills or shielding or cloaking or whatever else to make them a different challenge, and to me that's enough for the experience to resonate.  For a fun third person shooter that looks fantastic and for the most part plays seamlessly, it's hard to do much better right now with anything that has come out recently.  I'd probably go four stars... but I will be able to better judge it after the second campaign.  Good effort.   Not GOTY, isn't going to cure cancer, but it's a heck of a good time.  Also doesn't hurt to be a fan of the source material... maybe not the movies, but at least the shows... which is a good thing.

Avatar image for CastroCasper
CastroCasper

1589

Forum Posts

164

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By CastroCasper

Sounds actually kinda alright. I might rent this one.

Avatar image for duecenage
Duecenage

321

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

Edited By Duecenage

Come on guys, this is the epitome of 3/5 stars. It's a solid game that's gonna really appeal to Transformers fans quite a lot. As one myself, I'm thoroughly enjoying the game. I'm not blind to it shortcomings. It's very cheap in its difficulty. The button configurations and not optimized, nor is the "alternate" any different. Even I would be compelled to give this a 3/5. This might not be a good game to draw in newcomers, but I don't think it was made for them.

Avatar image for slyspider
slyspider

1832

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By slyspider
@mazik765 said:
" @Delta_Ass said:
" 3 stars, Jeff? This is bad comedy.
 
EDIT: To put it into perspective, is this game really on par with such luminaries as Dark Void and Alpha Protocol? Come the fuck on. "
This. This game is fun and addictive in the best ways. 4/5 stars for me, it is this years Arkham Asylum. "
ok fuck both of you. now that i got that out of the way, let me just say that the 3/5 star review means HE LIKES IT DUMBASSES BUT IT HAS A LOT OF PROBLEMS! He liked dark void and alpha protocol but they had issues that held them back from being really good. While i disagree with his review (i would give it a 2/5, ran into game breaking glitch) he can have his own damn view on the game! 
 
 
ps: SERVED!
Avatar image for sirblime
SirBlimE

182

Forum Posts

196

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By SirBlimE

Funny how different the reviews are for this game.

Avatar image for mazik765
mazik765

2372

Forum Posts

2258

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By mazik765
@slyspider said:
ok fuck both of you. now that i got that out of the way, let me just say that the 3/5 star review means HE LIKES IT DUMBASSES BUT IT HAS A LOT OF PROBLEMS! He liked dark void and alpha protocol but they had issues that held them back from being really good. While i disagree with his review (i would give it a 2/5, ran into game breaking glitch) he can have his own damn view on the game!    ps: SERVED! "
I realize that he likes it, but games like Alpha Protocol had major game breaking balance issues and various bugs. I played through this entire game twice + hours spent on the multiplayer without a single glitch. And yes, I realize that it is his opinion and he has the right (and the obligation...being a reviewer and all) to voice it. However, I also have the right to voice my disagreement with his opinion. That doesn't mean I believe my view is the one everyone must have, but it also means that I can disagree with opinions contrary to mine.
 
P.S. I guess you're the one that got 'served'?
Avatar image for kalisynth
Kalisynth

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Kalisynth
@Duecenage:  I agree 100% 
 
this is a very very solid title and it's only the fact that I haven't had any good transformers for years that make me tip it over the edge into a 4/5, but for people who don't have the same nostalgia then its a very solid 3/5 game
Avatar image for slyspider
slyspider

1832

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By slyspider
@mazik765 said:

" @slyspider said:

ok fuck both of you. now that i got that out of the way, let me just say that the 3/5 star review means HE LIKES IT DUMBASSES BUT IT HAS A LOT OF PROBLEMS! He liked dark void and alpha protocol but they had issues that held them back from being really good. While i disagree with his review (i would give it a 2/5, ran into game breaking glitch) he can have his own damn view on the game!    ps: SERVED! "

I realize that he likes it, but games like Alpha Protocol had major game breaking balance issues and various bugs. I played through this entire game twice + hours spent on the multiplayer without a single glitch. And yes, I realize that it is his opinion and he has the right (and the obligation...being a reviewer and all) to voice it. However, I also have the right to voice my disagreement with his opinion. That doesn't mean I believe my view is the one everyone must have, but it also means that I can disagree with opinions contrary to mine.  P.S. I guess you're the one that got 'served'? "
no game breaking bugs? what about the one alot of people have that crashes over and over and over and over and over and over and over........ and over again making the game unplayable. 
'served right back!'
Avatar image for mazik765
mazik765

2372

Forum Posts

2258

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By mazik765
@slyspider:  0% bugs, not a single crash or bug to speak of in the campaign, multiplayer of escalation mode. So my opinion to disagree with Jeff's opinion stands. I haven't heard anyone else complain about any bugs in the game besides something that gives a false 'cannot save' message but then lets you carry on your way.
 *served back I guess...*
Avatar image for wintersnowblind
WinterSnowblind

7599

Forum Posts

41

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By WinterSnowblind

I was a huge Transformers fan when I was young, and was really excited to learn that this game was not only NOT based on the movies, but actually good!  But the lack off offline co-op, or ability to do the Firefight mode with an offline friend really kills it for me.  I'll buy the game when it's cheaper, but I can't justify the price without features I'll actually use.

Avatar image for coldwolven
Cold_Wolven

2583

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Cold_Wolven

Even though review scores are up and down for this game I still would like to get it. Not really for nostalgia because I wasn't really a fan of the show when i was young but because it looks like a good game.
Avatar image for cirdain
Cirdain

3796

Forum Posts

1645

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 6

Edited By Cirdain
@mazik765 said:
" @slyspider:  0% bugs, not a single crash or bug to speak of in the campaign, multiplayer of escalation mode. So my opinion to disagree with Jeff's opinion stands. I haven't heard anyone else complain about any bugs in the game besides something that gives a false 'cannot save' message but then lets you carry on your way.  *served back I guess...* "
I have only had 1 bug when I was transforming shooting and gliding while one of my team was transforming the when I got into car form he was midway through his animation then I got mashed/clipped into some bit of floor. But then I transformed so I popped back out, I was no bad deal nothing is broken. Also it was on the PC.
 
I'm not to great at writing reviews, that's a skill I'll teach myself at some point, but I found this game to be 4 stars.  
Everything seems quite polished. High Textures and Anti-analysing could be used but the texture thing would require someone to have 8GB of ram due to the Levels being so massive. Seriously! the levels are fucking giant. I'd love to read an engine analysis for this because this is next level steaming techniques.  
Speaking of next level the action in the game so far (up to 4 chapter) is so crazy my mind started to sweat, I'm understanding the story so far and although this is the truest popcornification for a story line the story is (so far) interesting unlike many (yeah i'm making words up now) popcornicided stories, I'm looking at you MW2
I never play as the leader in this game because it feels so odd due to the dialogue from the leader. The leader will give an order to someone then tell them to hurry up then straight away the leader will go and do it. To me when that happens there doesn't seem to be a chain of command, even the Decepticons need order and when Megatron gives an order then no-one does it some "level of continuity-realism" within it's universe of logic is removed.  
I don't mind the "repetitive" art style, if you can handle playing bejewelled for over 20hrs then you won't get bored of style in this game.
Flying is oK.
So yeah there are amazing things to the game, but there are some tiny and medium sized issues with it but apart from that I hope High Moon make many more products.
Avatar image for cookiemonster
cookiemonster

2561

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By cookiemonster

Stars are not a proper representation of a review. Stop complaining people.

Avatar image for jamesj223
jamesj223

5

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jamesj223

loving this game.. huge transformers fan, was very excited when i heard that this game was going to have nothing to do with the michael bay things.. 
 
personally, i felt it was better than 3 stars, but i can see why others wouldnt.. 3.5 stars?

Avatar image for simondorondo
Simondorondo

50

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Simondorondo

woooo!

Avatar image for lil_cheeks
lil_cheeks

187

Forum Posts

155

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 3

Edited By lil_cheeks

Is there a misspelled word?  High bar to "best" or "beat"?

Avatar image for rvone
RVonE

5027

Forum Posts

8740

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By RVonE
@AlwaysAngry said:
Yeah, it's an opinion. But when you have thousands of people looking at your review, you have to think more objectively. I can rate Fallout 3 2/5 stars, but if I was a professional reviewer, I wouldn't review the game because I know it doesn't deserve that rating, it's just my shitty opinion.   For real though, I hate Fallout 3... "

How does one think more objectively? The concept of objectivity or objective thought--if at all possible--is not the same as thinking in line with what most other people would think.
Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By The_Laughing_Man

Gonna pick this up today! 

Avatar image for mistah_murkle
Mistah_Murkle

15

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mistah_Murkle

I thought IGN overrated it.

Avatar image for metal_mills
metal_mills

3604

Forum Posts

4049

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 3

Edited By metal_mills
@Mistah_Murkle said:
" I thought IGN overrated it. "
They do it all the time.
Avatar image for dbz1995
dbz1995

4962

Forum Posts

3989

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

Edited By dbz1995

It's weird; normally from reading 4 or 5 reviews you get a good gist of how the game is and where its faults are, but War for Cybertron seems to be an enigma. Still, I'm buying it.

Avatar image for vinchenzo
Vinchenzo

6461

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 2

Edited By Vinchenzo

All you people complaining about the review are tools, especially that mazik765 kid.

Avatar image for lethalki11ler
lethalki11ler

1819

Forum Posts

18650

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Edited By lethalki11ler

looks so-so

Avatar image for woowookins
Woowookins

116

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Woowookins

Not really a big surprise here..

Avatar image for senote
senote

96

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

Edited By senote
@Cirdain:  Are you kidding me? The levels are huge? not really no, try bland, linear, uninspired. "Speaking of next level the action in the game so far (up to 4 chapter) is so crazy my mind started to sweat" sorry but hell no, it really is not next level, it's last gen, its uninspired, it's textbook.
 
On a side note, I'm waiting for the Gamespot review, their front page is covered in a TF:WFC banner.
77 on Metacritic today, inflated by the overgenerous reviews so mark it down to 65/70 and i'd say thats about right.
Avatar image for chiefmegadeth666
CHIEFMEGADETH666

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Edited By CHIEFMEGADETH666
@mazik765 said:
" @slyspider said:
ok fuck both of you. now that i got that out of the way, let me just say that the 3/5 star review means HE LIKES IT DUMBASSES BUT IT HAS A LOT OF PROBLEMS! He liked dark void and alpha protocol but they had issues that held them back from being really good. While i disagree with his review (i would give it a 2/5, ran into game breaking glitch) he can have his own damn view on the game!    ps: SERVED! "
I realize that he likes it, but games like Alpha Protocol had major game breaking balance issues and various bugs. I played through this entire game twice + hours spent on the multiplayer without a single glitch. And yes, I realize that it is his opinion and he has the right (and the obligation...being a reviewer and all) to voice it. However, I also have the right to voice my disagreement with his opinion. That doesn't mean I believe my view is the one everyone must have, but it also means that I can disagree with opinions contrary to mine.  P.S. I guess you're the one that got 'served'? "
haha yeah so true...he got served hard core...
Avatar image for cirdain
Cirdain

3796

Forum Posts

1645

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 6

Edited By Cirdain
@senote: 6.5 good guess there
I haven't played to the end for a set up but if there is a sequel and there is better gameplay and more "inspired" level design then it would be great.
Avatar image for senote
senote

96

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

Edited By senote

The problem is Hasbro own the IP, they only care about the $$$'s not the IP, Activision can produce the $$$'s, they don't care about the IP or the consumer just their own $$$'s. Until someone at Hasbro stops and decides it's time they actually got serious about these games you won't see an amazing TF game.

Avatar image for delta_ass
delta_ass

3776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 7

Edited By delta_ass
@senote said:
" Until someone at Hasbro stops and decides it's time they actually got serious about these games you won't see an amazing TF game. "
But I did.
Avatar image for obsideondarman
ObsideonDarman

836

Forum Posts

3357

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Edited By ObsideonDarman

I am a huge Transformers fan but even if I wasn't I would still love this Game!

Avatar image for senote
senote

96

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

Edited By senote
@Delta_Ass:  I'm not denying that a lot of people will think it's amazing. My point really is that there are people, myself included who watched the recent TF movies and loved them, thought they were amazing, but from a technical point of view, they're only above average.
 
My bigger point is that if someone can make that amazing TF game, that gets great reviews everywhere and a 90+ metacrtitic, that really is the AA of TF games, you will look back on this and think 'hmm well now that you mention it, it wasn't that great, it was just good'.
Avatar image for cluter
Cluter

482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Cluter

I must be the only person to never have watched the cartoon.

Avatar image for robertorri
RobertOrri

1207

Forum Posts

433

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By RobertOrri

The PC version of this sounds awful. Like, really terribly awful.

Avatar image for vinchenzo
Vinchenzo

6461

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 2

Edited By Vinchenzo
@senote said:
" @Delta_Ass:  I'm not denying that a lot of people will think it's amazing. My point really is that there are people, myself included who watched the recent TF movies and loved them, thought they were amazing, but from a technical point of view, they're only above average.  My bigger point is that if someone can make that amazing TF game, that gets great reviews everywhere and a 90+ metacrtitic, that really is the AA of TF games, you will look back on this and think 'hmm well now that you mention it, it wasn't that great, it was just good'. "
Don't worry about Delta_Ass. I think it's quite clear he's going to act as if he's right all the time.
Avatar image for senote
senote

96

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

Edited By senote
@Vinchenzo: thanks, though It's no bad thing to stand by what you believe, and I wish he was right. The game is a solid third-person shooter and if it were any other game i'd have rated it slightly higher, but it's not it's a Transformers game following some shitty TF games and a bloody good Batman game and people deserve better. 
 
People keep pointing out all the little touches in the game that make it so great. Here's two of mine, I'm playing as Prime and he runs out of ammo for his rifle to which he said something like 'ammo regenerating' but its not, bullets don't regen I wish they did Prime cos i'm getting my ass pounded by pink robots. Last night I get to a bit where Prime, Bumblebee and Ratchet discuss 'Dark Energon, I think they said 'Dark Energon' about 72 times in a 15 second conversation, a conversation which just abruptly stops mid  convo leaving you wondering if the script just ended or what. 
Avatar image for delta_ass
delta_ass

3776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 7

Edited By delta_ass
@Vinchenzo said:
" @senote said:
Don't worry about Delta_Ass. I think it's quite clear he's going to act as if he's right all the time. "
Well, I'm sure as hell not gonna act as if I'm wrong all the time. You should think about what you're gonna say before you say it.
Avatar image for hydraham
HydraHam

1380

Forum Posts

675

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By HydraHam

i can't believe how angry people are getting over an opinion, if you don't like it don't read it, not everyone is going to love everything i agree with his review it is a 3/5, goto IGN or gametrailers if you half ass reviews.

Avatar image for lastdual
lastdual

17

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By lastdual

I found the campaign to be anything but bland and repetitive. Given the setting, High Moon did a pretty awesome job of mixing up the environments. Plus, there were just so many memorable moments and unique gameplay sequences that stood out. Switching things up from ground-based transformers to the aerialbots, running from Omega Supreme, the prison break, the insane sequence fighting Trypticon in orbit. Great variety altogether, and the game is just plain fun.

Avatar image for vinchenzo
Vinchenzo

6461

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 2

Edited By Vinchenzo
@Delta_Ass said:
" @Vinchenzo said:
" @senote said:
Don't worry about Delta_Ass. I think it's quite clear he's going to act as if he's right all the time. "
Well, I'm sure as hell not gonna act as if I'm wrong all the time. You should think about what you're gonna say before you say it. "
I thought about what I said, and I was correct. You don't have to act as if you're wrong, just be accepting of the flaws and stop lavishing undeserved praise on a game that clearly isn't perfect. Your review states that this game is, "this year's Arkham Asylum." Except it's not, and I haven't played Transformers but I have played Batman, and I can read this review and tell it has more flaws than Batman ever had. Your problem is that you don't meet in the middle, and that makes you a person that nobody probably wants to talk to. Such as me. Bye.
Avatar image for liquid1024
LIquid1024

78

Forum Posts

747

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 6

Edited By LIquid1024

ill have to give it a shot....

Avatar image for delta_ass
delta_ass

3776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 7

Edited By delta_ass
@Vinchenzo said:
" @Delta_Ass said:
" @Vinchenzo said:
" @senote said:
Don't worry about Delta_Ass. I think it's quite clear he's going to act as if he's right all the time. "
Well, I'm sure as hell not gonna act as if I'm wrong all the time. You should think about what you're gonna say before you say it. "
I thought about what I said, and I was correct. You don't have to act as if you're wrong, just be accepting of the flaws and stop lavishing undeserved praise on a game that clearly isn't perfect. Your review states that this game is, "this year's Arkham Asylum." Except it's not, and I haven't played Transformers but I have played Batman, and I can read this review and tell it has more flaws than Batman ever had. Your problem is that you don't meet in the middle, and that makes you a person that nobody probably wants to talk to. Such as me. Bye. "
But it's not undeserved praise, because I think this game deserves the praise. And it's this year's Arkham Asylum, because I've played it and it is. And uh...
 
And you haven't even played the fucking game, you stupid motherfucking douche. Jesus Christ, what are you doing here telling me I'm lavishing undeserved praise, when you haven't even played the friggin game?! Are you serious? What the hell is wrong with you? Do you live on this same planet? It isn't this year's Arkham Asylum... coming from a guy who's just talking out of his ass about a game he's never played. Eat shit and die.
Avatar image for senote
senote

96

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

Edited By senote
@Delta_Ass: I've played it and it really isn't this years AA, I wish it was, look at the metacritic scores AA is still up in the 90's, TF is mid 70's being pulled up by some overinflated review scores, nobody is saying it's a terrible game, just that it's not what it could have been, or should have been.
Avatar image for mjhealy
MjHealy

2009

Forum Posts

17432

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 15

Edited By MjHealy
@Fullmetal216 said:
" @SnailBumps said:
" Eat shit Jeff, this game is tits "
@MjHealy said:
" What Jeff says, goes! "
@Delta_Ass said:
" 3 stars, Jeff? This is bad comedy.
 
EDIT: To put it into perspective, is this game really on par with such luminaries as Dark Void and Alpha Protocol? Come the fuck on. "
I really hope that the above people are being sarcastic, for this is one of the most irritating things I can see when viewing the comments of a review. For some reason, people don't understand that a review is an opinion and just because you disagree with the review, doesn't mean that the review or the person is bad. Again, if all three of these are sarcasm, then my mistake, but it's hard to stand idly by, when crap like this happens. "
I was just being sarcastic. I don't care about a Transformers game regardless of quality. Reviews are opinions, and this is one for a game that I'm not fussed about.
Avatar image for nathhaw
NathHaw

2874

Forum Posts

1877

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By NathHaw
@lil_cheeks said:

" Is there a misspelled word?  High bar to "best" or "beat"? "

tr.v. best·edbest·ingbests To get the better of; beat:  "I'm a rough customer, I expect, but I know when I'm bested"  (Nathanael West).  
 
 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Best
Avatar image for zaph
Zaph

309

Forum Posts

5166

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By Zaph

I'm on the second to last chapter of the Autobot's campaign, and god damn is this game generic and tedious. It just seems to be metallic corridor after metallic corridor with the odd crappy boss battle thrown in every so often.
 
The game could really do with some more variety, visual stylation and better set pieces.

Avatar image for grahammaster
GrahamMaster

353

Forum Posts

148

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 11

Edited By GrahamMaster

I was never really looking forward to this game after the films kind of killed the whole franchise for me.

Avatar image for fleante
fleante

57

Forum Posts

47

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By fleante
@ptys said:
" I knew it! IGN gave this a 9.0, but the guy reviewing it didn't really explain why it was so great?.. Rookie. Well that solves that, I won't be getting coned into this nostalgia. Thanks Jeff. "
Are you seriously calling Arthus Gies a rookie? That's the most ignorant piece of junk I've read today. God, some people...