So the list above was selected by The Strong Museum, a New York museum now formally known as the Museum of Play.
It actually has a pretty legit collection of electronic games material, which you can read about here, including 'Will Wright Papers, 1989–2010'.
As a counter point, it is interesting to look at the list that the Library of Congress (really) has put forward as 'game canon':
The above list was compiled by a preservationist for Stanford and Warren Spector among others, and was announced during the 2007 GDC. More info here.
So Doom and Tetris feature on both lists. Both have Warcraft, though one is WoW and the other is 'Warcraft Series' We have Super Mario Bros on one and Super Mario Bros 3 on the other.
These differences do raise some questions about these lists. Why Super Mario Bros 3 over the original Super Mario Bros? Is it down to influence or popularity, or which is the 'better' game? The Library of Congress list has Civilisation I and II in the same entry, and has Warcraft as the whole series. Does the Strong Museum's Hall of Fame list seek to choose a single game from a series to be representative?
And what is the purpose of these lists? If it is preservation/awareness then the Game Canon list is more interesting at the moment. I can tell you all about six games on the Hall of Fame list, whereas the Canon list has things I don't know about. I had no idea that Sensible World of Soccer was held in such high regard!
Anyway sorry to hijack the thread, just thought it was interesting comparing these things. But seriously where is Ocarina of Time?
Log in to comment