• 165 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
#101 Edited by ashton (310 posts) -

Who cares, at the end of the day Gaintbomb > Everyone else

#102 Edited by DeanoXD (608 posts) -
@Manhattan_Project: 
 
so i am fanboy because i don't like the people they employ?  i don't care for most if not all the people that are left at 1up as well.
 
i am GB fanboy for sure, and i never said anything about pay off's
#103 Posted by Belmont_Shadow (174 posts) -
@Manhattan_Project said:

" @DeanoXD said:

" the one thing i will say i think ign has some of worst reviewers in the game industry and don't believe anything they say when it comes to games. "
@Belmont_Shadow said:
" IGn shouldn't start anything with anyone. They have a bunch of courrupt people working for them. "
Yes corrupt people who are paid of by companies to give perfect scores. I mean this is obvious from all the money they flaunt. The cars, the clothes, making it rain $100 bills at the club. MONEY HAT$ GALORE!!! Fuck, comments like these are gold when looking for stupid "loyalty" on the internet. You're just as bad as fanboys.  "
 
First of all they DO have some of the worst reviewers....so don't try and bum them without knowing the facts.  Just go read their cringe worthy Castelvania review
 
Secondly. They have a great site in terms of videos and news and shit but as a reviewing site they are the bottom of the barrel. You can't spell ignorant without IGN and that phrase is kind of true. 
 
I don't give a shit if they get hot girls to pose for their site they are still rubbish. I use to be a member there so i know what i'm talking about. the fanboys there are stupid as fuck the forums are shit the layout of the site is also turd. Takes me about half hour just to find something i want.
#104 Posted by RE_Player1 (7550 posts) -
@TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#105 Posted by chilibean_3 (1622 posts) -
#106 Posted by RobotHamster (4171 posts) -
@RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#107 Posted by Siphillis (1290 posts) -
@RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
(At what point do we hit some "quoted for truth" singularity?)
#108 Posted by Diamond (8634 posts) -
@Jeff said:
" Yeah, I don't think we have any real beef with IGN at large. "
But there's that one guy that makes you SOOOO ANGRY GRRRR
#109 Posted by Death_Unicorn (2838 posts) -
@Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#110 Posted by l4wd0g (1910 posts) -
@fisk0:  the Talk Radar folks love the Bombcast, but who doesn't?
#111 Posted by scarace360 (4828 posts) -
@mfpantst said:
" @scarace360 said:
" @mfpantst said:
" @scarace360 said:
" @mfpantst said:
" @scarace360 said:
" @Jeffsekai said:
" @Jeff said:
" Yeah, I don't think we have any real beef with IGN at large. "
Ya but what do you know? "
NOW WE START WAR! "
In communist Russia war starts you? "
How does war start me? "
That might involve softcore.  Would rather not get into it here. "
I WANNA KNOW! Sounds hot! "
OH JESUS.  No. "
SHOW ME WOMEN!
#112 Posted by one_2nd (2359 posts) -
@Death_Unicorn said:
" @Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#113 Posted by Manhattan_Project (2119 posts) -
@Belmont_Shadow said:
" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @DeanoXD said:

" the one thing i will say i think ign has some of worst reviewers in the game industry and don't believe anything they say when it comes to games. "
@Belmont_Shadow said:
" IGn shouldn't start anything with anyone. They have a bunch of courrupt people working for them. "
Yes corrupt people who are paid of by companies to give perfect scores. I mean this is obvious from all the money they flaunt. The cars, the clothes, making it rain $100 bills at the club. MONEY HAT$ GALORE!!! Fuck, comments like these are gold when looking for stupid "loyalty" on the internet. You're just as bad as fanboys.  "
 First of all they DO have some of the worst reviewers....so don't try and bum them without knowing the facts.  Just go read their cringe worthy Castelvania review Secondly. They have a great site in terms of videos and news and shit but as a reviewing site they are the bottom of the barrel. You can't spell ignorant without IGN and that phrase is kind of true.   I don't give a shit if they get hot girls to pose for their site they are still rubbish. I use to be a member there so i know what i'm talking about. the fanboys there are stupid as fuck the forums are shit the layout of the site is also turd. Takes me about half hour just to find something i want. "
Says the guy with "Belmont " in his user name.  
 
And I didn't say shit about their site and neither did you. All you did was accuse the staff of being corrupt which is just an insane, completely idiotic idea. 
 
One last thing: Daemon Hatfield gave the game a 7.5 defined as "Good" on their website.  
 
(Read that again, I'll wait...) 
 
He called it a good game but I guess fanboys just can't get that through their head.
Online
#114 Posted by adoggz (2044 posts) -
@scarace360 said:
" @mfpantst said:
" @scarace360 said:
" @mfpantst said:
" @scarace360 said:
" @mfpantst said:
" @scarace360 said:
" @Jeffsekai said:
" @Jeff said:
" Yeah, I don't think we have any real beef with IGN at large. "
Ya but what do you know? "
NOW WE START WAR! "
In communist Russia war starts you? "
How does war start me? "
That might involve softcore.  Would rather not get into it here. "
I WANNA KNOW! Sounds hot! "
OH JESUS.  No. "
SHOW ME WOMEN! "
and the survey says
#115 Edited by Siphillis (1290 posts) -
@Manhattan_Project said:

" @Belmont_Shadow said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @DeanoXD said:

" the one thing i will say i think ign has some of worst reviewers in the game industry and don't believe anything they say when it comes to games. "
@Belmont_Shadow said:
" IGn shouldn't start anything with anyone. They have a bunch of courrupt people working for them. "
Yes corrupt people who are paid of by companies to give perfect scores. I mean this is obvious from all the money they flaunt. The cars, the clothes, making it rain $100 bills at the club. MONEY HAT$ GALORE!!! Fuck, comments like these are gold when looking for stupid "loyalty" on the internet. You're just as bad as fanboys.  "
 First of all they DO have some of the worst reviewers....so don't try and bum them without knowing the facts.  Just go read their cringe worthy Castelvania review Secondly. They have a great site in terms of videos and news and shit but as a reviewing site they are the bottom of the barrel. You can't spell ignorant without IGN and that phrase is kind of true.   I don't give a shit if they get hot girls to pose for their site they are still rubbish. I use to be a member there so i know what i'm talking about. the fanboys there are stupid as fuck the forums are shit the layout of the site is also turd. Takes me about half hour just to find something i want. "
Says the guy with "Belmont " in his user name.   And I didn't say shit about their site and neither did you. All you did was accuse the staff of being corrupt which is just an insane, completely idiotic idea.  One last thing: Daemon Hatfield gave the game a 7.5 defined as "Good" on their website.   (Read that again, I'll wait...)  He called it a good game but I guess fanboys just can't get that through their head. "
IGN US editor reviews Football Manager 2009 without playing it.  (Defend them again, I'll wait...)  He called it a bad game but I guess fanboys (and the IGN UK reviewer) just can't get that through their heads.
#116 Posted by Bloodgraiv3 (2712 posts) -

What pot shots? 
#117 Posted by Noodles (539 posts) -
@one_2nd said:
" @Death_Unicorn said:
" @Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
cute :3
#118 Posted by Redbullet685 (6027 posts) -
@Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"

#119 Posted by Noodles (539 posts) -
@ashton said:
" Who cares, at the end of the day Gaintbomb > Everyone else "
I like Gaintbomb, but Taintbomb is my favorite webzone
#120 Edited by Manhattan_Project (2119 posts) -
@Siphillis said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @Belmont_Shadow said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

@Belmont_Shadow said: 

" IGn shouldn't start anything with anyone. They have a bunch of courrupt people working for them. "
Yes corrupt people who are paid of by companies to give perfect scores. I mean this is obvious from all the money they flaunt. The cars, the clothes, making it rain $100 bills at the club. MONEY HAT$ GALORE!!! Fuck, comments like these are gold when looking for stupid "loyalty" on the internet. You're just as bad as fanboys.  "
 First of all they DO have some of the worst reviewers....so don't try and bum them without knowing the facts.  Just go read their cringe worthy Castelvania review Secondly. They have a great site in terms of videos and news and shit but as a reviewing site they are the bottom of the barrel. You can't spell ignorant without IGN and that phrase is kind of true.   I don't give a shit if they get hot girls to pose for their site they are still rubbish. I use to be a member there so i know what i'm talking about. the fanboys there are stupid as fuck the forums are shit the layout of the site is also turd. Takes me about half hour just to find something i want. "
Says the guy with "Belmont " in his user name.   And I didn't say shit about their site and neither did you. All you did was accuse the staff of being corrupt which is just an insane, completely idiotic idea.  One last thing: Daemon Hatfield gave the game a 7.5 defined as "Good" on their website.   (Read that again, I'll wait...)  He called it a good game but I guess fanboys just can't get that through their head. "
IGN US editor reviews Football Manager 2009 without playing it.  (Defend them again, I'll wait...)  He called it a bad game but I guess fanboys (and the IGN UK reviewer) just can't get that through their heads. "
Would you please show me where it is stated that he didn't play it? Besides the clear UK bias bullshit, all it says is the guy mistakenly compared it to regular sports games.
 
And forgetting about that, how the hell does one mistake, almost two years ago, by one person (who nobody would even mention when talking about IGN writers) say absolutely anything about IGNs staff as a whole? 
 
Forgetting even about that, what you and him seem to be ignoring is that I called him out on his implication that IGN writers are somehow being persuaded by developers to give certain scores. That story has exactly shit to do with that. 
 
One last thing, if your going to try to use my writing methods against me, learn how to fucking use it correctly. 
You see, nobody is arguing that he called the game good, which is the only situation in which your statement would be properly used.  
 
Fucking idiot.
Online
#121 Edited by natetodamax (19176 posts) -

Oh, Jeff said something. Time for everyone to reply to his comment now. Oh wait, that's already happened!

#122 Posted by tanline (163 posts) -
@Noodles said:
" @one_2nd said:
" @Death_Unicorn said:
" @Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#123 Posted by Manhattan_Project (2119 posts) -
@natetodamax said:
" Oh, Jeff said something. Time for everyone to reply to his comment now. Oh wait, that's already happened! "
Lets start a new one.
Online
#124 Posted by Bones8677 (3211 posts) -
@Siphillis said:
" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @Belmont_Shadow said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @DeanoXD said:

" the one thing i will say i think ign has some of worst reviewers in the game industry and don't believe anything they say when it comes to games. "
@Belmont_Shadow said:
" IGn shouldn't start anything with anyone. They have a bunch of courrupt people working for them. "
Yes corrupt people who are paid of by companies to give perfect scores. I mean this is obvious from all the money they flaunt. The cars, the clothes, making it rain $100 bills at the club. MONEY HAT$ GALORE!!! Fuck, comments like these are gold when looking for stupid "loyalty" on the internet. You're just as bad as fanboys.  "
 First of all they DO have some of the worst reviewers....so don't try and bum them without knowing the facts.  Just go read their cringe worthy Castelvania review Secondly. They have a great site in terms of videos and news and shit but as a reviewing site they are the bottom of the barrel. You can't spell ignorant without IGN and that phrase is kind of true.   I don't give a shit if they get hot girls to pose for their site they are still rubbish. I use to be a member there so i know what i'm talking about. the fanboys there are stupid as fuck the forums are shit the layout of the site is also turd. Takes me about half hour just to find something i want. "
Says the guy with "Belmont " in his user name.   And I didn't say shit about their site and neither did you. All you did was accuse the staff of being corrupt which is just an insane, completely idiotic idea.  One last thing: Daemon Hatfield gave the game a 7.5 defined as "Good" on their website.   (Read that again, I'll wait...)  He called it a good game but I guess fanboys just can't get that through their head. "
IGN US editor reviews Football Manager 2009 without playing it.  (Defend them again, I'll wait...)  He called it a bad game but I guess fanboys (and the IGN UK reviewer) just can't get that through their heads. "
That article smacks of cultural elitism. Not saying he's lying, just that the writer showed a significant bias in favor of his own county's reviewers.
#125 Posted by jakob187 (21644 posts) -
@Jeff said:
" Yeah, I don't think we have any real beef with IGN at large. "
This is why we can't have nice things, Jeff.
#126 Posted by Tactical_Kill (1695 posts) -
@Tanpreet said:
" @Noodles said:
" @one_2nd said:
" @Death_Unicorn said:
" @Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#127 Posted by RiotBananas (3600 posts) -
@Tactical_Kill said:
" @Tanpreet said:
" @Noodles said:
" @one_2nd said:
" @Death_Unicorn said:
" @Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#128 Posted by FiestaUnicorn (1577 posts) -
@RiotBananas said:
" @Tactical_Kill said:
" @Tanpreet said:
" @Noodles said:
" @one_2nd said:
" @Death_Unicorn said:
" @Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"

:
#129 Posted by Manhattan_Project (2119 posts) -

Holy shit this thread needs to be closed.

Online
#130 Posted by JaredA (820 posts) -
@FiestaUnicorn
@RiotBananas said:
" @Tactical_Kill said:
" @Tanpreet said:
" @Noodles said:
" @one_2nd said:
" @Death_Unicorn said:
" @Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"

:
#131 Posted by LeetBalla (696 posts) -
@JJWeatherman said:
" A wild Jeff appears! "
I already used my master ball, noooo : (
#132 Posted by takua108 (1478 posts) -

On a scale of "1" to "going to be locked soon," this thread is about a 9.7.

#133 Posted by ThePhantomnaut (6186 posts) -
@Leon592 said:
" @FiestaUnicorn
@RiotBananas said:
" @Tactical_Kill said:
" @Tanpreet said:
" @Noodles said:
" @one_2nd said:
" @Death_Unicorn said:
" @Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"

:
"
#134 Posted by Bouke (1401 posts) -

I heard Chris from Joystiq say he shot Jeff in the face while Jeff was doing the quicklook; that was pretty funny! 
#135 Posted by Hooded (435 posts) -
FUCK IGN, nah i joke, but I have noticed a couple of shots passed towards GB from a couple of IGN's Podcast. Nothing too bad to care about though. I support GB because they're the best at what they do and give me the content I want. I used to subscribe to IGN's Insider thing but thats just a total waste of money.
 
@Bouke said:
" I heard Chris from Joystiq say he shot Jeff in the face while Jeff was doing the quicklook; that was pretty funny!  "
Yeah I listened to that Joystiq podcast, in the MoH quicklook.
#136 Posted by RoboRobb (1051 posts) -

I can completely understand why honourable journalists would be annoyed by soulless walking-boobs like Jessica Chobot, she's everything wrong with todays journalism.

#137 Posted by Jost1 (2077 posts) -
@Noodles said:
" @ashton said:
" Who cares, at the end of the day Gaintbomb > Everyone else "
I like Gaintbomb, but Taintbomb is my favorite webzone "
Dude I taintbombed someone at my local mall parking lot
#138 Posted by CrazedMaverick (214 posts) -
@ThePhantomnaut said:
" @Leon592 said:
" @FiestaUnicorn
@RiotBananas said:
" @Tactical_Kill said:
" @Tanpreet said:
" @Noodles said:
" @one_2nd said:
" @Death_Unicorn said:
" @Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"

:
"
"
#139 Posted by Jost1 (2077 posts) -

This thread = now about taintbombing

#140 Posted by CookieMonster (2416 posts) -
@CrazedMaverick said:
" @ThePhantomnaut said:
" @Leon592 said:
" @FiestaUnicorn
@RiotBananas said:
" @Tactical_Kill said:
" @Tanpreet said:
" @Noodles said:
" @one_2nd said:
" @Death_Unicorn said:
" @Siphillis said:
" @RobotHamster said:
" @RE_Player92 said:
" @TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"

:
"
"
"
#141 Posted by Slab64 (1051 posts) -

Hay guys want to read my latest Ryan/Rorie taintbombing slashfic???/

#142 Posted by mfpantst (2574 posts) -

how is this thread active.

#143 Posted by BetonneTom (113 posts) -
@mfpantst:  Magic!
#144 Posted by Winternet (8006 posts) -
@Manhattan_Project said:

" @Siphillis said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @Belmont_Shadow said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

@Belmont_Shadow said: 

" IGn shouldn't start anything with anyone. They have a bunch of courrupt people working for them. "
Yes corrupt people who are paid of by companies to give perfect scores. I mean this is obvious from all the money they flaunt. The cars, the clothes, making it rain $100 bills at the club. MONEY HAT$ GALORE!!! Fuck, comments like these are gold when looking for stupid "loyalty" on the internet. You're just as bad as fanboys.  "
 First of all they DO have some of the worst reviewers....so don't try and bum them without knowing the facts.  Just go read their cringe worthy Castelvania review Secondly. They have a great site in terms of videos and news and shit but as a reviewing site they are the bottom of the barrel. You can't spell ignorant without IGN and that phrase is kind of true.   I don't give a shit if they get hot girls to pose for their site they are still rubbish. I use to be a member there so i know what i'm talking about. the fanboys there are stupid as fuck the forums are shit the layout of the site is also turd. Takes me about half hour just to find something i want. "
Says the guy with "Belmont " in his user name.   And I didn't say shit about their site and neither did you. All you did was accuse the staff of being corrupt which is just an insane, completely idiotic idea.  One last thing: Daemon Hatfield gave the game a 7.5 defined as "Good" on their website.   (Read that again, I'll wait...)  He called it a good game but I guess fanboys just can't get that through their head. "
IGN US editor reviews Football Manager 2009 without playing it.  (Defend them again, I'll wait...)  He called it a bad game but I guess fanboys (and the IGN UK reviewer) just can't get that through their heads. "
Would you please show me where it is stated that he didn't play it? Besides the clear UK bias bullshit, all it says is the guy mistakenly compared it to regular sports games. And forgetting about that, how the hell does one mistake, almost two years ago, by one person (who nobody would even mention when talking about IGN writers) say absolutely anything about IGNs staff as a whole?  Forgetting even about that, what you and him seem to be ignoring is that I called him out on his implication that IGN writers are somehow being persuaded by developers to give certain scores. That story has exactly shit to do with that.  One last thing, if your going to try to use my writing methods against me, learn how to fucking use it correctly. You see, nobody is arguing that he called the game good, which is the only situation in which your statement would be properly used.   Fucking idiot. "
I read the review. It is hilarious. Yes, it's one example and one mistake from one guy no one knows about, but, still, it has the IGN name on it. And this mistake came to light because a) it's just huge and b) it's about something that millions care about.
 
In the review he says "only the most diehard fans of the sport would be able to appreciate" referring to approximately 100 million people. Haha
#145 Posted by Everyones_A_Critic (6288 posts) -

Meh, IGN gets too much shit from the internet. Their site is poorly designed but at least they can get a fucking review up on time....(COUGH GAMESPOT/GB COUGH ALTHOUGH GB IS SOMEWHAT EXCUSABLE DUE TO THEIR SMALLER STAFF COUGH)...

#146 Posted by NTM (7269 posts) -

Last thing I ever heard from anything having to do of IGN and Giantbomb was back when there was a demo for some game exclusive on IGN and Brad said "From our friends at IGN here we have this game".
#147 Posted by MooseyMcMan (10502 posts) -
@TheHT said:
" @adoggz said:
" @Afroman269 said:
" @valrog said:
" @GlenTennis said:

" @Izaak said:

" @Th3_James said:
" @Axxol said:
" @RecSpec said:
" @JauntyHat said:
" @Hershey07 said:
" @aurahack said:
" @Meteora said:
" Since when did this start? I don't recall GB taking potshots at IGN. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#148 Posted by Dantekiller (206 posts) -

Call me crazy but i think this dude is crazy 

#149 Posted by hedfone (1749 posts) -

grab yo jimmy hats we rollin up on ign tonight

#150 Posted by adoggz (2044 posts) -
@Dantekiller said:
" Call me crazy but i think this dude is crazy  "
who, that guy? NAHHHHH!!!!!!!!