I'm sure that most of you already own the game, but If you care, or if you don't own it yet, You can check out their review here:
http://pc.ign.com/articles/121/1213266p1.html
Minecraft
Game » consists of 33 releases. Released May 17, 2009
- Android
- iPhone
- iPad
- Mac
- + 17 more
- PC
- Xbox 360 Games Store
- Xbox 360
- PlayStation Network (PS3)
- PlayStation 3
- PlayStation 4
- Xbox One
- PlayStation Network (Vita)
- PlayStation Vita
- Windows Phone
- Wii U
- Nintendo Switch
- New Nintendo 3DS
- Browser
- Linux
- Amazon Fire TV
- Xbox Series X|S
A 3D procedurally-generated game of world exploration, resource harvesting, and freeform construction, featuring a unique block-based art style and online multiplayer. It received numerous ports and updates for nearly a decade after its initial release.
IGN reviews Minecraft
Hopefully this link isn't broken http://pc.ign.com/articles/121/1213266p1.html
Dont get me wrong I enjoy minecraft, but really 8.5 in graphics department? My 13 year old cousin could do better in photoshop....
I don't think Giant Bomb should become a dumping ground for links to reviews on IGN.
This review made me lose all respect for IGN (what as left)... they teased it for ages with videos showing scores Minecraft won't be getting and justified it by saying "this is the final version the developer wants us to play". But as Jeff said on the Bombcast, you can't charge money for a beta. I completely agree... if you charge money you forfeit to right to say it's not complete. By that logic any game could come out with a "version 0.1" sticker on it and be review-proof.
There's nothing wrong with reviewing it I guess... I'd be interested to see other sites take on it. But their whole way of doing it like constantly doling out dumb videos to get extra clicks and gushing all over this new fad just reeks of pandering.
@jakob187: As I said before, Minecraft should be reviewed I think... it's no more pointless than reviewing Little Big Planet or Trackmania. It's telling people "this is a game worth your money".
Why is it that every time IGN posts a review for a blockbuster game someone makes a thread about it? Who gives a shit what IGN things? If we wanted to know what IGN thinks we would be on IGN and not Giantbomb.
@jakob187 said:
Reviewing Minecraft is probably one of the most pointless endeavors ever.
I second that.
@Marz said:
hmm, i never understood why IGN give individual scores to certain aspects of the game if it doesn't mean anything to the final score. When you tally up the individual scores and average it out, it only comes out as an 8.1 score.
Pretty much. To me, it just helps to emphasize that a score at the end is just a silly distillation of the big picture.
@clstirens said:
@Marz said:
hmm, i never understood why IGN give individual scores to certain aspects of the game if it doesn't mean anything to the final score. When you tally up the individual scores and average it out, it only comes out as an 8.1 score.Pretty much. To me, it just helps to emphasize that a score at the end is just a silly distillation of the big picture.
The hard mathematical score would be an 8.1 if you get the average of the individual scores. A 9 is not that far off, and I think it balances pretty well the weight of each aspect reviewed. Maybe a bad UI or poor on-screen instructions can break an RPG or RTS, but is it really that necessary for Minecraft? I think what the reviewer is trying to say is that 1. Minecraft is better than the sum of its parts 2. its parts are pretty damn good in general and 3. although it has its problems, they don't burden the final product much.
Also, some of the comments on the review are hilariously sad.
I'm glad for that 9.0 (even a someone who isn't a fan of the toy-box-not-a-game). The way he talked in the lead up it was looking like a 10 and Minecraft getting a 10 just scares me for reviews in the future.
Amen.Why is it that every time IGN posts a review for a blockbuster game someone makes a thread about it? Who gives a shit what IGN things? If we wanted to know what IGN thinks we would be on IGN and not Giantbomb.
This.Why is it that every time IGN posts a review for a blockbuster game someone makes a thread about it? Who gives a shit what IGN things? If we wanted to know what IGN thinks we would be on IGN and not Giantbomb.
Also OP if you want to discuss reviews at least start a review thread instead of a single site's review. Just to help you out Eurogamer also reviewed the game http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-11-18-minecraft-review
@TomA said:
Hey, at least there's no difficulty setting for the reviewer to lie about...
Topical.
I tend to agree with those saying that Minecraft is at a point where a review just isn't worth it. It has been around for a long time, people know what it is, and the vast majority of people who were going to buy it already have by this point. If you haven't figured out yet if this is for you, I don't think any number of reviews will change that fact.
@LordXavierBritish said:
This seems unneccesary.
For reals. If Minecraft didn't receive a score of "Yo, it's Minecraft" in every category, it was reviewed wrong.
@Banshee: I'm basically fed up of threads like these (all from the past 2 months). 9.0 from IGN, IGN review up, I think IGN liked the game., IGN review is up - it's a little strange, First Review is in: 9.5 from IGN, IGN's review of GOW 3 will be up tomorrow -- score predictions?
Why do all these people think we want to know what IGN thinks?
How does one even do this? Like what do you say about graphics? They're terrible by today's standards but that's sorta the point. So are they great then? Writing a review for it is fine I guess but it seems like maybe an opinion piece or just a general feeling for the game seems like the best idea.
@mosespippy said:
@Banshee: I'm basically fed up of threads like these (all from the past 2 months). 9.0 from IGN, IGN review up, I think IGN liked the game., IGN review is up - it's a little strange, First Review is in: 9.5 from IGN, IGN's review of GOW 3 will be up tomorrow -- score predictions?
Why do all these people think we want to know what IGN thinks?
Because video games.
In all seriousness though, I both agree and disagree. I agree that these IGN threads are getting out of hand and, at times, they seem a little obsessive. (And it's turning us into NeoGaf and I don't like that future at all.) On the other hand, IGN is, in my opinion, not exactly what I would call a quality site so watching some people poke fun of them can sometimes be entertaining if nothing else.
Yep, I kept pondering a revisit of my review from a year ago, and... nuhh, it's still Minecraft. It's a little more like Terraria now than it was then, meaning if you like one you should try the other. If you don't like either, you never will. Boss dragons and enchantment tables won't change that.
@mosespippy said:
@Banshee: I'm basically fed up of threads like these (all from the past 2 months). 9.0 from IGN, IGN review up, I think IGN liked the game., IGN review is up - it's a little strange, First Review is in: 9.5 from IGN, IGN's review of GOW 3 will be up tomorrow -- score predictions?
Why do all these people think we want to know what IGN thinks?
I hate this. People need to stop. OR at least create a thread that collects all reviews.
@Subjugation said:
@TomA said:
Hey, at least there's no difficulty setting for the reviewer to lie about...
Topical.
I tend to agree with those saying that Minecraft is at a point where a review just isn't worth it. It has been around for a long time, people know what it is, and the vast majority of people who were going to buy it already have by this point. If you haven't figured out yet if this is for you, I don't think any number of reviews will change that fact.
Can someone explain this to me? Did a quick Google search... but to no avail.
A review for minecraft does seem quite pointless. Though I would love to see an actual Quick look of the game, here on the site.
@Marz said:
hmm, i never understood why IGN give individual scores to certain aspects of the game if it doesn't mean anything to the final score. When you tally up the individual scores and average it out, it only comes out as an 8.1 score.
I don't bother with sites like IGN because of stuff like this.
At the very most I glance at a Giant Bomb review (if they've reviewed it), and rely on word of mouth. Serves me pretty well.
Most of the IGN editors do not even like the individual scoring stuff, they've said as much on various podcasts. I think the problem with IGN getting rid of it is just how big the company and all the politics that must go on in regards to this stuff. Not really as simple a setup as the GB crew has going on.@Marz said:
hmm, i never understood why IGN give individual scores to certain aspects of the game if it doesn't mean anything to the final score. When you tally up the individual scores and average it out, it only comes out as an 8.1 score.I don't bother with sites like IGN because of stuff like this.
At the very most I glance at a Giant Bomb review (if they've reviewed it), and rely on word of mouth. Serves me pretty well.
@Zenaxzd said:
@Cube said:Most of the IGN editors do not even like the individual scoring stuff, they've said as much on various podcasts. I think the problem with IGN getting rid of it is just how big the company and all the politics that must go on in regards to this stuff. Not really as simple a setup as the GB crew has going on.@Marz said:
hmm, i never understood why IGN give individual scores to certain aspects of the game if it doesn't mean anything to the final score. When you tally up the individual scores and average it out, it only comes out as an 8.1 score.I don't bother with sites like IGN because of stuff like this.
At the very most I glance at a Giant Bomb review (if they've reviewed it), and rely on word of mouth. Serves me pretty well.
Which is completely understandable. It just means they have one less reader. A staff reviewer can't just say, "I'm not going to review it like they do". If you can't change the publication, you just move on to the next one, I guess.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment