Whos in favor of adding signatures?

Sign this if you want GB to add signautres... i miss funny pictures and xfire tags :(

AWW HOW SAD

Wow man just leave the forum already stop ruining it for us gbers

I think there should be limits on how big your sig can be, BIG limits so that the forum doesn't get so cluttered. But I'm in favor of at least being able to have a small signature

Not I, it only means longer loading.

I like sigs as it's good to put my gamercard and stuff in, but as some people have said there should be a size limit due to load times. Or maybe a text sig only?

I mean smaller sized sigs. I too hate those ones were people put GIANT images and its annoying to post.

No thanks, I don't want to see loads of images where someone just clicked a couple times with brushes they downloaded from deviant art and added a random character on it. Takes ages to load.

Sigs would be alright, i could live without em if they made the avy a bit bigger and supported gifs -_-.

I actually liked sigs.
Although I'm sure I annoyed users with my 8MB GIF of the entire dance sequence for The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya >_>

Small ones would be nice, but I'm totally OK without them. I think for the last year or two I posted on GameSpot I didn't use one.

I want a sig. It shows someone how unique you are. I do remember people from their sigs but avatars too

I don't really care either way.  I am fine without them for now, plus I used GameFAQs for ages and they just have text sigs.  If they add them they just have to make it so people can't put GIANT annoying pictures and other crap in it.

If they buclked down on the size of them then I could dig it. I don't want some wallpaper sized piece of shit stretching my page out.

I don't think signatures are necessary. Maybe just text signatures? I don't know.

I don't think they are completely necessary. If they are implemented they should either be text only or if images are allowed extremely limited in size. This forum actually looks nice without the extra clutter. Just my 2 cents.

I don't think they would be a good idea since it would take up  lots of bandwith and slow down the site more.

"I don't think they are completely necessary. If they are implemented they should either be text only or if images are allowed extremely limited in size. This forum actually looks nice without the extra clutter. Just my 2 cents.
"

I don't want signatures.  Ever since I joined this other forum that hasn't had them for about 3 years, I can't stand seeing a page with a giant image after every post.

Sig's are just as bad as having adverts between each post. It's pointless having them, especially as the site is quite cluttered as it is.

Sigs are pointless.

I need to have a signature.

"Sigs are pointless."

"Not I, it only means longer loading.
"

"Homer said:

"Sigs are pointless."

"

So I can see a bunch of sigs that say " Ha ha you read my sig and thought it was my post" NO NEver mini bio is enough

Me

nah mini bios are alright

I'm in favor of limited text-only signatures... 2 lines maximum.  I don't want to see the place cluttered with all sorts of crap.

"McDazzle said:

"Homer said:

"Sigs are pointless."

"

Not really."

I dont think we need em.

"twenty0ne said:

"McDazzle said:

"Homer said:

"Sigs are pointless."

"

Not really."

What do they do other than make the page longer,and load times longer"

"They aren't pointless. People can showcase artwork they've made in GIMP or PS, people can add their online identities, etc."

"twenty0ne said:

"They aren't pointless. People can showcase artwork they've made in GIMP or PS, people can add their online identities, etc."

You can do that with the mini bio too"

I'm not in favor of them.  The mini bio is much better because you can choose to view it or not for each user.

I want sigs, to be able to further distinguish yourself from others.

I rather liked gamespot's sigs. Text ones are the best, that way you can have your PSN ID, Wii friend code, gamertag, whatever, or you can have a funny quote someone said!

Personally i think its fine the way it is. No need for distracting images.

I like it how it is to be honest.
Flashy sigs steal my internets and distract from the topics.

I wouldn't mind it, but I do like not having extra clutter in the forums.

I'll go with no to signatures.  My forum use in life has been very sporadic and one of the reasons I'm liking this board (other than it's surprisingly relaxed atmosphere) is it's very clean looking an easier to navigate through without signatures.  I think the mini bio serves that purpose well enough.  If you click on any of them you'll realize what you would be getting if signatures were allowed and then you appreciate them not being there even more.

I WANT

"I'm not in favor of them.  The mini bio is much better because you can choose to view it or not for each user."

If they bring them in make them small.

I'm not a fan of signatures, so I don't really care as long as they implement a way to turn them off.

Not into signatures to be honest., they're unnecessary clutter. Use the mini bio for stuff you want to include in a signature.

Never really liked sigs. It just gave people reasons to put crap on it that wasn't even funny.

We don't need sigs, when our profile pages become more customizable they will be the shit. Sigs screw forums up especially a forum set out like this one.

I would definetly appreciate bigger Avatars/User pics though. Not too large, 120x120 max I think.

I'd like a sig for gamertags and stuff, random pictures not so much.